Advertising MPLS labels in OSPF
draft-gredler-ospf-label-advertisement-03
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last updated | 2013-11-22 (latest revision 2013-05-21) | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
pdf
htmlized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gredler-ospf-label-advertisement-03.txt
Abstract
Historically MPLS label distribution was driven by protocols like LDP, RSVP and LBGP. All of those protocols are session oriented. In order to obtain label binding for a given destination FEC from a given router one needs first to establish an LDP/RSVP/LBGP session with that router. Advertising MPLS labels in IGPs [I-D.gredler-rtgwg-igp-label-advertisement] describes several use cases where utilizing the flooding machinery of link-state protocols for MPLS label distribution allows to obtain the binding without requiring to establish an LDP/RSVP/LBGP session with that router. This document describes the protocol extension to distribute MPLS label bindings by the OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 protocol.
Authors
Hannes Gredler
(hannes@juniper.net)
Shane Amante
(shane@level3.net)
Tom Scholl
(tscholl@amazon.com)
Luay Jalil
(luay.jalil@verizon.com)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)