CAPWAP Comparative Analysis
draft-gwee-capwap-comparative-analysis-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Richard Gwee | ||
| Last updated | 2005-09-12 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
The purpose of this document is to present a comparative evaluation of the Control and Provisioning of Wireless Access Points (CAPWAP) protocol proposals. To the date of this document, the following four protocols have been proposed, namely CAPWAP Tunneling Protocol (CTP), Light Weight Access Point Protocol (LWAPP), Secure Light Access Point Protocol (SLAPP), Wireless LAN Control Protocol (WiCoP). Each of these protocols has its own unique strengths in fulfilling the CAPWAP Objectives through their own mechanisms and functionalities. The final CAPWAP protocol should comprise all of these strengths. This document gives a comparative study of the four proposed protocols based on the CAPWAP Objectives and makes recommendations on the combination of their strengths for the final CAPWAP protocol.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)