DNSSEC Cryptographic Algorithm Recommendation Update Process
draft-hardaker-dnsop-rfc8624-bis-04
Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(candidate for dnsop WG)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Wes Hardaker , Warren "Ace" Kumari | ||
Last updated | 2024-07-07 | ||
Replaced by | draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis | ||
RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
Stream | WG state | Call For Adoption By WG Issued | |
Document shepherd | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
<EDITOR NOTE: This document does not change the status (MUST, MAY, RECOMMENDED, etc) of any of the algorithms listed in [RFC8624]; that is the work of future documents. Instead, this document moves the canonical list of algorithms from [RFC8624] to an IANA registry. This is done for two reasons: 1) to allow the list to be updated more easily, and, much more importantly, 2) to allow the list to be more easily referenced.> The DNSSEC protocol makes use of various cryptographic algorithms to provide authentication of DNS data and proof of non-existence. To ensure interoperability between DNS resolvers and DNS authoritative servers, it is necessary to specify both a set of algorithm implementation requirements and usage guidelines to ensure that there is at least one algorithm that all implementations support. This document updates [RFC8624] by moving the canonical source of algorithm implementation requirements and usage guidance for DNSSEC from [RFC8624] to an IANA registry. Future extensions to this registry can be made under new, incremental update RFCs.
Authors
Wes Hardaker
Warren "Ace" Kumari
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)