Practical Issues with Datagram Transport Layer Security in Constrained Environments
draft-hartke-dice-practical-issues-01
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Klaus Hartke | ||
| Last updated | 2014-10-10 (Latest revision 2014-04-08) | ||
| Replaces | draft-hartke-core-codtls | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document investigates practical issues around the implementation of Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) 1.2 in constrained environments, and explores some ideas for an optimized version of DTLS 1.2 that is more friendly to constrained nodes and networks.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)