Guidelines for Cryptographic Algorithm Agility
draft-housley-crypto-alg-agility-00
| Document | Type | Replaced Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Russ Housley | ||
| Last updated | 2014-01-08 (Latest revision 2013-12-20) | ||
| Replaced by | RFC 7696 | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
plain text
htmlized
pdfized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-iab-crypto-alg-agility | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of
the expired Internet-Draft can be found at:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-housley-crypto-alg-agility-00.txt
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-housley-crypto-alg-agility-00.txt
Abstract
Many IETF protocols may use of cryptographic algorithms to provide confidentiality, integrity, or non-repudiation. Communicating peers must support the same cryptographic algorithm or algorithms for these mechanisms to work properly. This memo provides guidelines for ensuring that such a protocol has the ability to migrate from one algorithm to another over time.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)