Generation of IPv6 Atomic Fragments Considered Harmful
draft-ietf-6man-deprecate-atomfrag-generation-08
Yes
(Kathleen Moriarty)
(Suresh Krishnan)
No Objection
(Ben Campbell)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Terry Manderson)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -07)
Unknown
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -07)
Unknown
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-08-31 for -07)
Unknown
I'm not going to stand in the way of publication, but I don't think we need to publish this document: it already served it's purpose. Evidence of that is in RFC7915, rfc2460bis...
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-08-31 for -07)
Unknown
I have to say I agree with the tsv-art review that it is not fully clear to me that this explanation needs an own document. For me a much short rational for this change (1 or max. 2 paragraphs) that could be integrated in 2460bis would be sufficient (also given that this document has soe redundancy).
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown
Terry Manderson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown