RSVP-TE Signaling Extensions in Support of Flexi-Grid Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing (DWDM) Networks
draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-rsvp-te-ext-05
Yes
(Deborah Brungard)
No Objection
(Alia Atlas)
(Alissa Cooper)
(Alvaro Retana)
(Barry Leiba)
(Ben Campbell)
(Brian Haberman)
(Jari Arkko)
(Kathleen Moriarty)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Terry Manderson)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -03)
Unknown
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2015-11-17 for -03)
Unknown
This document makes minor modifications to GMPLS signaling, but does not change the manageability considerations for such networks. Clearly, protocol analysis tools and other diagnostic aids (including logging systems and MIB modules) will need to be enhanced to support the new traffic parameters and label formats. Are those manageability considerations described anywhere, by any chance?
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2015-11-18 for -03)
Unknown
Tina Tsou performed the opsdir review
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2015-11-18 for -03)
Unknown
The IPR disclosure is dated one day after the date of the current draft. That's kind of iccky in terms of the WG having really had a chance to consider what they think of the IPR, e.g. before a WGLC. Did the WG specifically consider this IPR declaration in a way that left some trace? (Sorry I've not had time to check the list archive.)
Terry Manderson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown