Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) Protocol Extensions for Multi-Layer and Multi-Region Networks (MLN/MRN)
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-mln-extensions-12
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2010-04-19
|
12 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor |
2010-04-16
|
12 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress |
2010-04-16
|
12 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors |
2010-04-07
|
12 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress |
2010-04-07
|
12 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors |
2010-03-18
|
12 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress |
2010-03-18
|
12 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors |
2010-03-17
|
12 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress |
2010-03-09
|
12 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza |
2010-03-08
|
12 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress |
2010-03-08
|
12 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
2010-03-08
|
12 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2010-03-08
|
12 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2010-03-05
|
12 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2010-03-04 |
2010-03-04
|
12 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza |
2010-03-04
|
12 | Ross Callon | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon |
2010-03-04
|
12 | Lisa Dusseault | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lisa Dusseault |
2010-03-04
|
12 | Pasi Eronen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Pasi Eronen |
2010-03-03
|
12 | Magnus Westerlund | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund |
2010-03-03
|
12 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jari Arkko |
2010-03-03
|
12 | Robert Sparks | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Robert Sparks |
2010-03-03
|
12 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Shawn Emery. |
2010-03-03
|
12 | Dan Romascanu | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu |
2010-03-03
|
12 | Ralph Droms | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ralph Droms |
2010-03-03
|
12 | Tim Polk | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Tim Polk |
2010-03-02
|
12 | Ron Bonica | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica |
2010-02-28
|
12 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley |
2010-02-24
|
12 | Adrian Farrel | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::AD Followup by Adrian Farrel |
2010-02-24
|
12 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel |
2010-02-24
|
12 | Adrian Farrel | Ballot has been issued by Adrian Farrel |
2010-02-24
|
12 | Adrian Farrel | Created "Approve" ballot |
2010-02-24
|
12 | Adrian Farrel | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-03-04 by Adrian Farrel |
2010-02-22
|
12 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed |
2010-02-22
|
12 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-mln-extensions-12.txt |
2010-02-21
|
12 | Adrian Farrel | State Changes to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Adrian Farrel |
2010-02-16
|
12 | Amanda Baber | IANA comments: Action #1: Upon approval of this document, IANA will make the following assignments in the "Class Names, Class Numbers, and Class Types" registry … IANA comments: Action #1: Upon approval of this document, IANA will make the following assignments in the "Class Names, Class Numbers, and Class Types" registry at http://www.iana.org/assignments/rsvp-parameters. Class Number Class Name Reference ------------ ----------------------- --------- TDB CALL ATTRIBUTES [RFC-ccamp-gmpls-mln-extensions-11] Class Type (C-Type): 1 Call Attributes [RFC-ccamp-gmpls-mln-extensions-11] Action #2: Upon approval of this document, IANA will create the following registry at http://www.iana.org/assignments/rsvp-parameters Registry Name: Call Attributes TLV Reference: [RFC-ccamp-gmpls-mln-extensions-11] Registration Procedures: RFC Required Initial contents of this sub-registry will be: TLV Value Name Reference --------- ----------------------- --------- 0 Reserved [RFC-ccamp-gmpls-mln-extensions-11] 1 Attributes Flags TLV [RFC-ccamp-gmpls-mln-extensions-11] 2-32767 Unassigned 32768-65535 Reserved for Private Use [RFC-ccamp-gmpls-mln-extensions-11] Action #3: Upon approval of this document, the IANA will in the following registry "RSVP PARAMETERS" located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/rsvp-parameters. Registry Name: Call Attributes flags Reference:[RFC-ccamp-gmpls-mln-extensions-11] Registration Procedures: RFC Required Range: (0-31 bits) Initial Contents: Bit Number 32-bit Value Name Reference ---------- ------------ --------------------- --------- 0 0x80000000 Call Inheritance Flag [RFC-ccamp-gmpls-mln-extensions-11] 1 0x40000000 Pre-Planned LSP Flag [RFC-ccamp-gmpls-mln-extensions-11] 2-31 Unassigned Action #4: Upon approval of this document, the IANA will make the following assignments in the "Class Names, Class Numbers, and Class Types" registry at http://www.iana.org/assignments/rsvp-parameters In object (232) EXCLUDE_ROUTE Sub-object type 3 Label [RFC-ccamp-gmpls-mln-extensions-11] 35 Switching Capability (SC) [RFC-ccamp-gmpls-mln-extensions-11] Action #5: Upon approval of this document, IANA will make the following assignments in the "Types for sub-TLVs of TE Link TLV (Value 2)" registry at http://www.iana.org/assignments/ospf-traffic-eng-tlvs/ospf-traffic-eng-tlvs.xhtml Value Sub-TLV REF ----- ------------------------------------------------- --- 25 Interface Adjustment Capability Descriptor (IACD) [RFC-ccamp-gmpls-mln-extensions-11] Action #6: Upon approval of this document, IANA will make the following assignments in the "IS-IS TLV Codepoints" registry at http://www.iana.org/assignments/isis-tlv-codepoints sub-registry: "Sub-TLVs for TLV 22, 141, and 222" Type Description ---- ------------------------------------------------- 25 Interface Adjustment Capability Descriptor (IACD) [RFC-ccamp-gmpls-mln-extensions-11] |
2010-02-16
|
12 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system |
2010-02-05
|
12 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Shawn Emery |
2010-02-05
|
12 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Shawn Emery |
2010-02-02
|
12 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
2010-02-02
|
12 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
2010-02-02
|
12 | Adrian Farrel | State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Adrian Farrel |
2010-02-02
|
12 | Adrian Farrel | Last Call was requested by Adrian Farrel |
2010-02-02
|
12 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
2010-02-02
|
12 | (System) | Last call text was added |
2010-02-02
|
12 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
2010-02-01
|
11 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-mln-extensions-11.txt |
2010-01-17
|
12 | Adrian Farrel | State Changes to AD Evaluation::AD Followup from AD Evaluation by Adrian Farrel |
2010-01-16
|
12 | Adrian Farrel | State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Adrian Farrel |
2010-01-05
|
12 | Cindy Morgan | [Note]: 'Lou Berger (lberger@labn.net) is the Document Shepherd.' added by Cindy Morgan |
2010-01-05
|
12 | Cindy Morgan | >(1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the > Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the > … >(1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the > Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the > document and, in particular, does he or she believe this > version is ready for forwarding to the IESG for publication? Lou Berger is the Document Shepherd. He has reviewed the document and believe this version is ready for publication at the intended status. >(1.b) Has the document had adequate review both from key WG members > and from key non-WG members? Does the Document Shepherd have > any concerns about the depth or breadth of the reviews that > have been performed? The document has received adequate review and discussion. It has been revised to be consistent with WG opinion and other related activities in the IETF. >(1.c) Does the Document Shepherd have concerns that the document > needs more review from a particular or broader perspective, > e.g., security, operational complexity, someone familiar with > AAA, internationalization, or XML? No. >(1.d) Does the Document Shepherd have any specific concerns or > issues with this document that the Responsible Area Director > and/or the IESG should be aware of? No. > For example, perhaps he > or she is uncomfortable with certain parts of the document, or > has concerns whether there really is a need for it. In any > event, if the WG has discussed those issues and has indicated > that it still wishes to advance the document, detail those > concerns here. Has an IPR disclosure related to this document > been filed? If so, please include a reference to the > disclosure and summarize the WG discussion and conclusion on > this issue. No IPR disclosures were found. >(1.e) How solid is the WG consensus behind this document? Does it > represent the strong concurrence of a few individuals, with > others being silent, or does the WG as a whole understand and > agree with it? Consensus appears to be good. >(1.f) Has anyone threatened an appeal or otherwise indicated extreme > discontent? If so, please summarize the areas of conflict in > separate email messages to the Responsible Area Director. (It > should be in a separate email because this questionnaire is > entered into the ID Tracker.) No threats. No discontent. >(1.g) Has the Document Shepherd personally verified that the > document satisfies all ID nits? (See > http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html and > http://tools.ietf.org/tools/idnits/.) Boilerplate checks are > not enough; this check needs to be thorough. Has the document > met all formal review criteria it needs to, such as the MIB > Doctor, media type, and URI type reviews? If the document > does not already indicate its intended status at the top of > the first page, please indicate the intended status here. Yes. >(1.h) Has the document split its references into normative and > informative? Yes. > Are there normative references to documents that > are not ready for advancement or are otherwise in an unclear > state? No. There are two references that are drafts: [GMPLS-RR] Berger, L., Papadimitriou, D., and JP. Vasseur, "PathErr Message Triggered MPLS and GMPLS LSP Reroute", draft-ietf-mpls-gmpls-lsp-reroute, Work in progress. [HIER-BIS] Shiomoto, K., and Farrel, A., "Procedures for Dynamically Signaled Hierarchical Label Switched Paths", draft-ietf ccamp-lsp-hierarchy-bis, Work in progress. The first draft is in the RFC editor's queue and the second is in the IESG publication process. > If such normative references exist, what is the > strategy for their completion? Both documents are essential complete and are in the publication process. > Are there normative references > that are downward references, as described in [RFC3967]? If > so, list these downward references to support the Area > Director in the Last Call procedure for them [RFC3967]. No downward references. > >(1.i) Has the Document Shepherd verified that the document's IANA > Considerations section exists and is consistent with the body > of the document? If the document specifies protocol > extensions, are reservations requested in appropriate IANA > registries? Are the IANA registries clearly identified? If > the document creates a new registry, does it define the > proposed initial contents of the registry and an allocation > procedure for future registrations? Does it suggest a > reasonable name for the new registry? See [RFC2434]. If the > document describes an Expert Review process, has the Document > Shepherd conferred with the Responsible Area Director so that > the IESG can appoint the needed Expert during IESG Evaluation? The IANA section looks good. >(1.j) Has the Document Shepherd verified that sections of the > document that are written in a formal language, such as XML > code, BNF rules, MIB definitions, etc., validate correctly in > an automated checker? Yes, no automated checks needed. >(1.k) The IESG approval announcement includes a Document > Announcement Write-Up. Please provide such a Document > Announcement Write-Up. Recent examples can be found in the > "Action" announcements for approved documents. The approval > announcement contains the following sections: > > Technical Summary > Relevant content can frequently be found in the abstract > and/or introduction of the document. If not, this may be > an indication that there are deficiencies in the abstract > or introduction. This document extends GMPLS routing and signaling to support the operation of GMPLS Multi-Layer/Multi-Region Networks. A network comprised of multiple switching types (e.g. PSC and TDM) controlled by a single GMPLS control plane instance is called a Multi-Region Network (MRN). A network comprising transport nodes participating in different data plane switching layers controlled by a single GMPLS control plane instance is called a Multi-Layer Network (MLN). This document defines GMPLS RSVP, OSPF and IS-IS to cover GMPLS MLN/MRN requirements. > Working Group Summary > Was there anything in the WG process that is worth noting? > For example, was there controversy about particular points > or were there decisions where the consensus was > particularly rough? This document received much attention and discussion in its early revisions. The document has been largely stable for quite some time, mainly needing revisions as part of the publication process. > Document Quality > Are there existing implementations of the protocol? Have a > significant number of vendors indicated their plan to > implement the specification? Are there any reviewers that > merit special mention as having done a thorough review, > e.g., one that resulted in important changes or a > conclusion that the document had no substantive issues? If > there was a MIB Doctor, Media Type, or other Expert Review, > what was its course (briefly)? In the case of a Media Type > Review, on what date was the request posted? > There have been no public statements related to intent to implement, but the portions of the extensions are now being used as part of the GMPLS tool set and are (at least) expected to implemented in those contexts. > Personnel > Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Lou Berger. > Who is the > Responsible Area Director? Adrian Farrel > If the document requires IANA > experts(s), insert 'The IANA Expert(s) for the registries > in this document are .' > |
2010-01-05
|
12 | Cindy Morgan | Draft Added by Cindy Morgan in state Publication Requested |
2009-12-14
|
10 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-mln-extensions-10.txt |
2009-11-11
|
09 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-mln-extensions-09.txt |
2009-10-16
|
08 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-mln-extensions-08.txt |
2009-08-10
|
07 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-mln-extensions-07.txt |
2009-07-13
|
06 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-mln-extensions-06.txt |
2009-04-17
|
05 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-mln-extensions-05.txt |
2009-03-23
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-mln-extensions-04.txt |
2008-11-03
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-mln-extensions-03.txt |
2008-07-14
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-mln-extensions-02.txt |
2008-02-25
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-mln-extensions-01.txt |
2007-11-04
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-mln-extensions-00.txt |