GMPLS RSVP-TE Extensions for Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Configuration
draft-ietf-ccamp-oam-configuration-fwk-13

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 12 and is now closed.

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) (was Discuss, Yes) Yes

Yes (2014-02-26)
No email
send info
IANA issues have been discussed and resolved to my satisfaction

(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2014-02-25)
No email
send info
Than you for addressing my DISCUSS and comments in version -13.

(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -12)
No email
send info

(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -12)
No email
send info

(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -12)
No email
send info

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -12)
No email
send info

(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2014-01-21 for -12)
No email
send info
lools like -12 addressed outstanding opsdir comments.

(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -12)
No email
send info

(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -12)
No email
send info

(Richard Barnes; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -12)
No email
send info

(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2014-01-22 for -12)
No email
send info
Thanks for clearly identifying the new security consideration and explaining how it can be mitigated.

(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -12)
No email
send info

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -12)
No email
send info

(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2014-01-22 for -12)
No email
send info
This is a well written document and I just have a few nits that you might consider.

There were a number of terms that as far as I could see were unexpanded on first use and are not "well known". I picked up DWDM, RSVP-TE, LSP, WSON, TDM, SDH/SONET. Please can I suggest an quick abbreviation scrub.

With the text "the ADMIN_STATUS Object is specified for RSVP-TE in [RFC3473]. "  This ref should go a little earlier in the para, when you first use the term

"If this is not possible, a PathErr SHOULD be sent "
and
"a ResvErr may be sent"

Presumable these are "messages" or "responses"


    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |           Type (IANA)         |           Length              |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |    OAM Type   |                 Reserved                      |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                                                               |
   ~                           sub-TLVs                            ~
   |                                                               |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   Type: indicates a new type: the OAM Configuration TLV (IANA to
   assign).

Is the length syntax well known in this context?