CoRE Target Attributes Registry
draft-ietf-core-target-attr-06
Yes
Francesca Palombini
(Robert Wilton)
No Objection
Erik Kline
Jim Guichard
John Scudder
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
Éric Vyncke
(Andrew Alston)
(Martin Duke)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
Francesca Palombini
Yes
Murray Kucherawy
Yes
Comment
(2023-09-07 for -05)
Sent
I concur with the comments from both Paul and Roman. I suggest to satisfy Roman's concern that the "updates" notation be removed; this updates a registry created by RFC 9176, but doesn't actually update that document.
Erik Kline
No Objection
Jim Guichard
No Objection
John Scudder
No Objection
Paul Wouters
No Objection
Comment
(2023-09-06 for -05)
Sent
I'm not sure why the IANA registration policy for this new registry is not "Specification Required",
as the advise to the Designated Expert is:
The expert is also instructed to direct the registrant to provide a specification (Section 4.6 of [BCP26]),
but can make exceptions, for instance when a specification is not available at the time of registration but
is likely forthcoming.
Also "provide a specification" [to the Designated Expert] could be seen as "provided only to the DE, but not for publication".
It seems simpler and more common to just set the policy to Specification Required.
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Comment
(2023-09-05 for -05)
Sent
Thank you to Christian Huitema for the SECDIR review. I have no comment on the substance of the document. Given that this document is updating a proposed standard (PS) status document (RFC9176) and the primary users of this registry appear to be other PS documents, I believe that this document should also be published with PS status.
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
No Objection
Éric Vyncke
No Objection
Robert Wilton Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -05)
Unknown
Andrew Alston Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05)
Not sent
Martin Duke Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05)
Not sent