DHCPv6 Extension Practices and Considerations
draft-ietf-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6-06
| Document | Type | Active Internet-Draft (dhc WG) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Ren Gang , Lin He , Ying Liu | ||
| Last updated | 2020-11-15 | ||
| Replaces | draft-ren-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6 | ||
| Stream | IETF | ||
| Intended RFC status | Informational | ||
| Formats | plain text xml pdf htmlized (tools) htmlized bibtex | ||
| Reviews | |||
| Stream | WG state | Dead WG Document (wg milestone: Feb 2020 - WGLC Multi-requireme... ) | |
| Document shepherd | Bernie Volz | ||
| Shepherd write-up | Show (last changed 2020-02-13) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists (IESG: Dead) | |
| Action Holders |
(None)
|
||
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | Éric Vyncke | ||
| Send notices to | Bernie Volz <volz@cisco.com> | ||
| IANA | IANA review state | IANA OK - No Actions Needed | |
Dynamic Host Configuration (DHC) G. Ren
Internet-Draft L. He
Intended status: Informational Y. Liu
Expires: May 19, 2021 Tsinghua University
November 15, 2020
DHCPv6 Extension Practices and Considerations
draft-ietf-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6-06
Abstract
IP addresses as the communication identifier bear more and more
properties to meet different requirements. The privacy protection,
accountability, security, and manageability of networks can be
supported by extending the DHCPv6 protocol according to requirements.
This document provides current extension practices and typical DHCPv6
server softwares on extensions, defines a DHCPv6 general model,
discusses some extension points, and presents extension cases.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on May 19, 2021.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
Ren, et al. Expires May 19, 2021 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft problem statement of mredhcpv6 November 2020
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Current Extension Practices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.1. Standardized and Non-standardized DHCPv6 Extension Cases 4
3.2. Current DHCPv6 Server Software Cases . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. Extension Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4.1. DHCPv6 General Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4.2. Extension Points . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4.2.1. Messages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4.2.2. Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4.2.3. Message Processing Functions . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4.2.4. Address Generation Mechanisms . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4.3. Extension Principles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
5. Extension Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
8. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
9.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
9.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
1. Introduction
The IP address plays a significant role in the communication on the
Internet. IP address generation is also closely related to the
privacy protection, accountability, security, and manageability of
networks. Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)
[RFC8415] is a critical network protocol that can be used to
dynamically provide IPv6 addresses and other network configuration
parameters to IPv6 nodes. DHCPv6 continues to be extended and
improved through new options, protocols, and message processing
mechanisms.
Although DHCPv6 provides more and more comprehensive functionalities
and DHCPv6 server softwares also provide extension interfaces to
allow administrators to alter and customize the way how they handle
and respond to DHCPv6 messages, there is still a lack of
comprehensive insight into where and how to conduct extensions in
Show full document text