Recommended Usage of the Authenticated Received Chain (ARC)
draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-usage-09
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (dmarc WG) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Steven Jones , Kurt Andersen | ||
| Last updated | 2020-11-16 (latest revision 2020-05-07) | ||
| Replaces | draft-jones-arc-usage | ||
| Stream | IETF | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
pdf
htmlized (tools)
htmlized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | WG state | Parked WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | No shepherd assigned | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-usage-09.txt
Abstract
The Authenticated Received Chain (ARC) provides an authenticated "chain of custody" for a message, allowing each entity that handles the message to see what entities handled it before, and to see what the message's authentication assessment was at each step in the handling. But the specification does not indicate how the entities handling these messages should interpret or utilize ARC results in making decisions about message disposition. This document will provide guidance in these areas.
Authors
Steven Jones
(smj@dmarc.org)
Kurt Andersen
(kurta@linkedin.com)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)