Locally Served DNS Zones
draft-ietf-dnsop-default-local-zones-15
Yes
(Jari Arkko)
(Ron Bonica)
No Objection
(Dan Romascanu)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Ralph Droms)
(Robert Sparks)
(Russ Housley)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Wesley Eddy)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 15 and is now closed.
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-04-26)
Unknown
Will it be clear to IANA exactly what they have to do in order to satisfy the following text from Section 6? IANA should co-ordinate with the RIRs to ensure that, as DNSSEC is deployed in the reverse tree, delegations for these zones are made in the manner described in Section 7.
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-04-26)
Unknown
I don't understand why this is not standards track. It might not be likely that implementation experience will change this spec, but it's certainly possible.
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-04-27)
Unknown
wordsmithing here: Sec 3: use 2219 language in the following?: OLD: This document recommends that the NS record defaults to the name of the zone and the SOA MNAME defaults to the name of the only NS RR's target. NEW: It is RECOMMENDED that the NS record defaults to the name of the zone and the SOA MNAME defaults to the name of the only NS RR's target.
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown