DNS Terminology
draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis-10

Yes

Paul Wouters
Warren Kumari
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
Éric Vyncke
(Robert Wilton)

No Objection

Erik Kline
Francesca Palombini
Jim Guichard
John Scudder
Murray Kucherawy
Roman Danyliw
(Andrew Alston)
(Martin Duke)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.

Paul Wouters
Yes
Comment (2023-09-18 for -09) Sent 
Thanks to the DNSOP WG for keeping this document up to date with the latest developments and language shifts in the operational communities.
Warren Kumari
Yes
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
(was Discuss) Yes
Comment (2023-09-25) Sent 
Thanks for addressing my Discuss point.
Éric Vyncke
Yes
Comment (2023-09-15 for -09) Sent 
# Éric Vyncke, INT AD, comments for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis-09

Thank you for the work put into this document: it is really important to have a common vocabulary and specific terms. I have appreciated the removal of 'old but confusing' terms such as lame delegation and bailiwick (the latter being very obscure for non-English readers).

My review of the diff to RFC 8499 found no issues.

Special thanks to Benno Overeinder for the shepherd's detailed write-up including the WG consensus and the justification of the intended status. 

Please note that Suresh Krishnan is the Internet directorate reviewer and you may want to consider this int-dir review as well when it will be available (no need to wait for it though):
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis/reviewrequest/18093/

Regards,

-éric
Erik Kline
No Objection
Francesca Palombini
No Objection
Comment (2023-09-20 for -09) Not sent 
Thank you for the work on this document.

Many thanks to Cullen Jennings for his ART ART review: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/4i-YjH8dLge_RddBsrVPcyy-C7w/.
Jim Guichard
No Objection
John Scudder
No Objection
Murray Kucherawy
No Objection
Comment (2023-09-16 for -09) Sent 
I thought the IESG (though maybe not this particular one) had previously discouraged publishing "living documents" like this one in the RFC series.  So why aren't we doing this as a wiki page or something?  Not a hill I care to die on, but I'd like to understand.
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Comment (2023-09-15 for -09) Not sent 
Thank you to Magnus Nystrom for the SECDIR review.

Thank you to the authors and WG for performing upkeep on DNS terminology.
Robert Wilton Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (2023-09-19 for -09) Sent 
Thanks for spending the time to keep this up to date.
Andrew Alston Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -09) Not sent 

                            

                        
                    

                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Martin Duke Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    (for -09)
                                
                                
                                    
                                         Not sent