GEOPRIV Layer 7 Location Configuration Protocol: Problem Statement and Requirements
draft-ietf-geopriv-l7-lcp-ps-10
Yes
(Cullen Jennings)
No Objection
(Lars Eggert)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Ralph Droms)
(Ron Bonica)
(Ross Callon)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2009-06-25)
Unknown
In Section 6:
The following requirements and assumptions have been identified:
Requirement L7-1: Identifier Choice
The L7 LCP MUST be able to carry different identifiers or MUST
define an identifier that is mandatory to implement.
Did you mean "identifier type" here?
Regarding
the latter aspect, such an identifier is only appropriate if it is
from the same realm as the one for which the location information
service maintains identifier to location mapping.
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2009-07-01)
Unknown
There are plenty of acronyms not expanded at the first occurence: USB, DSL, PPoE, etc.
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2009-07-01)
Unknown
There are some typo/grammar issues with the Note blocks added to the start of Sections 4 and 5 that need to be corrected before publication.
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown