Skip to main content

Bootstrapping WebSockets with HTTP/3
draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets-01

The information below is for an old version of the document.
Document Type
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft that was ultimately published as RFC 9220.
Author Ryan Hamilton
Last updated 2022-01-05 (Latest revision 2021-12-15)
Replaces draft-hamilton-httpbis-h3-websockets
RFC stream Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
Formats
Reviews
Additional resources Mailing list discussion
Stream WG state Submitted to IESG for Publication
Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by WG
Document shepherd Mark Nottingham
Shepherd write-up Show Last changed 2021-12-15
IESG IESG state Became RFC 9220 (Proposed Standard)
Consensus boilerplate Yes
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD Francesca Palombini
Send notices to mnot@mnot.net
IANA IANA review state IANA - Review Needed
draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets-01
HTTP                                                         R. Hamilton
Internet-Draft                                                    Google
Intended status: Standards Track                        15 December 2021
Expires: 18 June 2022

                  Bootstrapping WebSockets with HTTP/3
                  draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets-01

Abstract

   The mechanism for running the WebSocket Protocol over a single stream
   of an HTTP/2 connection is equally applicable to HTTP/3, but the HTTP
   version-specific details need to be specified.  This document
   describes how the mechanism is adapted for HTTP/3.

About This Document

   This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.

   Status information for this document may be found at
   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets/.

   Discussion of this document takes place on the HTTP Working Group
   mailing list (mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org), which is archived at
   https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/.  Working Group
   information can be found at https://httpwg.org/.

   Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
   https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/labels/h3-websockets.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on 18 June 2022.

Hamilton                  Expires 18 June 2022                  [Page 1]
Internet-Draft    Bootstrapping WebSockets with HTTP/3     December 2021

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2021 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
   license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
   Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
   and restrictions with respect to this document.  Code Components
   extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
   described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
   provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Conventions and Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   3.  Websockets Upgrade over HTTP/3  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   4.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   5.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   6.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4

1.  Introduction

   [RFC8441] defines an extension to HTTP/2 which is also useful in
   HTTP/3.  This extension makes use of an HTTP/2 setting.  Appendix A.3
   of [HTTP3] describes the required updates for HTTP/2 settings to be
   used with HTTP/3.

2.  Conventions and Definitions

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
   BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
   capitals, as shown here.

3.  Websockets Upgrade over HTTP/3

   [RFC8441] defines a mechanism for running the WebSocket Protocol
   [RFC6455] over a single stream of an HTTP/2 connection.  It defines
   an Extended CONNECT method which specifies a new ":protocol" pseudo
   header field and new semantics for the ":path" and ":authority"
   pseudo header fields.  It also defines a new HTTP/2 setting sent by a
   server to allow the client to use Extended CONNECT.

Hamilton                  Expires 18 June 2022                  [Page 2]
Internet-Draft    Bootstrapping WebSockets with HTTP/3     December 2021

   The HTTP/3 stream closure is also analogous to the TCP connection
   closure of [RFC6455].  Orderly TCP-level closures are represented as
   a FIN bit on the stream (Section 4.2 of [HTTP3]).  RST exceptions are
   represented with an stream error (Section 8 of [HTTP3]) of type
   H3_REQUEST_CANCELLED (Section 8.1 of [HTTP3]).

   The semantics of the headers and setting are identical to those in
   HTTP/2 as defined [RFC8441].  Appendix A.3 of [HTTP3] requires that
   HTTP/3 settings be registered separately for HTTP/3.  The
   SETTINGS_ENABLE_CONNECT_PROTOCOL value is 0x08 (decimal 8), as in
   HTTP/2.

   If a server which advertises support for Extended CONNECT but
   receives an Extended CONNECT request with a ":protocol" value that is
   unknown or is not supported, the server SHOULD respond to the request
   with a 501 (Not Implemented) status code (Section 15.6.2 of [HTTP]).
   A server MAY provide more information via a Problem Details response
   [RFC7807].

4.  Security Considerations

   This document introduces no new security considerations beyond those
   discussed in [RFC8441].

5.  IANA Considerations

   This document registers a new setting in the "HTTP/3 Settings"
   registry ([HTTP3]).

   +==================================+======+===============+=========+
   | Setting Name                     |Value | Specification | Default |
   +==================================+======+===============+=========+
   | SETTINGS_ENABLE_CONNECT_PROTOCOL | 0x08 | This document | 0       |
   +----------------------------------+------+---------------+---------+

                                  Table 1

6.  Normative References

   [HTTP]     Fielding, R. T., Nottingham, M., and J. Reschke, "HTTP
              Semantics", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-
              httpbis-semantics-19, 12 September 2021,
              <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-
              semantics-19>.

Hamilton                  Expires 18 June 2022                  [Page 3]
Internet-Draft    Bootstrapping WebSockets with HTTP/3     December 2021

   [HTTP3]    Bishop, M., "Hypertext Transfer Protocol Version 3
              (HTTP/3)", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-
              quic-http-34, 2 February 2021,
              <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-quic-
              http-34>.

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119>.

   [RFC6455]  Fette, I. and A. Melnikov, "The WebSocket Protocol",
              RFC 6455, DOI 10.17487/RFC6455, December 2011,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6455>.

   [RFC7807]  Nottingham, M. and E. Wilde, "Problem Details for HTTP
              APIs", RFC 7807, DOI 10.17487/RFC7807, March 2016,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7807>.

   [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
              2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
              May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174>.

   [RFC8441]  McManus, P., "Bootstrapping WebSockets with HTTP/2",
              RFC 8441, DOI 10.17487/RFC8441, September 2018,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8441>.

Acknowledgments

   TODO acknowledge.

Author's Address

   Ryan Hamilton
   Google

   Email: rch@google.com

Hamilton                  Expires 18 June 2022                  [Page 4]