Active and Passive Metrics and Methods (with Hybrid Types In-Between)
draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive-06

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.

Alvaro Retana No Objection

Comment (2016-01-19 for -05)
No email
send info
Just a nit..   Section 3. (Terms and Definitions) says that the “definitions are consistent with [I-D.zheng-ippm-framework-passive].”  Shouldn’t it be the other way around?

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (2016-01-20 for -05)
No email
send info
Nice document, thanks.

(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ( for -05)
No email
send info

(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ( for -05)
No email
send info

(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -05)
No email
send info

(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -05)
No email
send info

(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -05)
No email
send info

(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2016-01-06 for -05)
No email
send info
I had the explain the differences and pros/cons of active/passive so many times...
Now I can simply refer to this document. Thanks Al.

(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -05)
No email
send info

(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -05)
No email
send info

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -05)
No email
send info

(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2016-01-21 for -05)
No email
send info
Jouni Korhonen performed the opsdir review

Summary: Ready with issues

Major:    None.

Minor:

* The IDnits gives a comment but the outdated reference can be corrected at any time seen appropriate.

* Line 412:  expand DSCP on the first use.

* Lines 413-414: there is no closing ")".

* Lines 491-494: I find a discussion about IPR converage in this I-D somewhat odd. Specifically because there are no hard facts i.e., "..may be covered.." Maybe it is just me and if the WG has agree to have such text there I have no problem with it.


- Jouni

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2016-01-21 for -05)
No email
send info
4.3: would it be worth noting (here or elsewhere) that
this seems to be a hard thing to do with non-e2e ciphertext,
e.g. part way along a VPN path

(Terry Manderson; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2016-01-18 for -05)
No email
send info
Thanks for writing this! Its a very useful reference. Especially the discussion/examples section.