Packet Delay Variation Applicability Statement
draft-ietf-ippm-delay-var-as-02
Yes
(Dan Romascanu)
(Lars Eggert)
(Ron Bonica)
No Objection
(Chris Newman)
(Cullen Jennings)
(David Ward)
(Mark Townsley)
(Ross Callon)
(Tim Polk)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2009-01-07)
Unknown
Good work. One small issue: I found this confusing: range(b) = b_max - b_min = D_max - D_min + A Is "b" here a variable or does it represent buffering as earlier? b_min does not appear elsewhere in the document, did you mean B_min?
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2009-01-07)
Unknown
In section 4.4: Note that the IPDV histogram will change if the sequence of delays is modified, but the PDV histogram will stay the same. Should this be if the *order* of the sequence of delays is modified? I believe if the sequence of delays were modified by changing the values, PDV histogram could change. On reading more of the document, I believe this wording is intentional; it seems that sequence is used as a synonym for order elsewhere in the doc. For the record, I usually treat "sequence" as a synonym for "an ordered set" rather than "an order", but usage may differ in other communities.
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Chris Newman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
David Ward Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Pasi Eronen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2009-01-06)
Unknown
The document was unexpectedly easy to understand (even to someone who doesn't have much background knowledge about this kind of metrics and measurements) -- good work!
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2009-01-08)
Unknown
In the Gen-ART Review by Christian Vogt, two suggestions were made: Section 1.1, 3rd paragraph: "Lost and delayed packets are separated by a waiting time threshold." -- Since the waiting time threshold does not only apply to those packets that are lost or delayed, this sentence should be rephrased to: "Packets for which one-way loss or delay is measured are...". Section 3.2, 4th-to-last paragraph: "The error in the alignment process can be accounted for by a factor, A." -- A is an offset (addend) here, not a factor.
Tim Polk Former IESG member
(was No Record, Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2009-01-06)
Unknown
The Summary of Comparisons table in section 7.3 would be more legible if there was a blank line or a line of dashes separating each row.