Technical summary
This set of 3 documents replaces section 10 of RFC 2026, and provides
a much more detailed description of the considerations regarding
intellectual property that need to be taken into account when working
in the IETF.
Particular attention is paid to copyright issues and issues concerning
requirements for implementation, such as patent licensing.
The "Guidelines" document relates useful experience gathered when
working with IPR issues in the IETF.
Working Group summary
The working group was chartered to document existing IPR practice in
the IETF, and discuss whether updates were needed.
After a great deal of debate, a strong consensus emerged that the
fundamental IPR practice in the IETF should not be changed at this time.
The details of IPR practice were gone over in minute detail, and the
documents are believed to represent WG consensus on the practice that
the IETF should follow at present.
Protocol Quality
The documents were reviewed for the IESG by Harald Alvestrand.
RFC EDITOR NOTE:
In section 5.6 of draft-ietf-ipr-submission-rights, please make the
following changes:
OLD:
"Copyright (C) The Internet Society <year>. The initial
version of this MIB module was published in RFC XXXX; for full
legal notices see the RFC itself or see:
http://www.ietf.org/copyrights/ianamib.html."
NEW:
"Copyright (C) The Internet Society <year>. The initial
version of this MIB module was published in RFC XXXX; for full
legal notices see the RFC itself. Supplementary information
may be available on http://www.ietf.org/copyrights/ianamib.html."
OLD:
Substitute "PIB" for "MIB" in the statement for PIB modules. In
the case of MIB and PIB modules this statement should be placed in
the DESCRIPTION clause of the MODULE-IDENTITY macro.
NEW:
For other types of components than "MIB", substitute "MIB module" with
an appropriate identifier. In
the case of MIB and PIB modules this statement should be placed in
the DESCRIPTION clause of the MODULE-IDENTITY macro.