IPsec Cluster Problem Statement
draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipsec-ha-09
Yes
(Russ Housley)
(Sean Turner)
No Objection
(Adrian Farrel)
(Dan Romascanu)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Ralph Droms)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Tim Polk)
Recuse
(Jari Arkko)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.
Russ Housley Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2010-06-27)
Unknown
I think some of the references should be Normative.
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
David Harrington Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2010-06-30)
Unknown
1) in 3.7, I think it would make the document easier to read if you spelled out the LS and HS acronyms. 2) "the other half of the flow" - s/the the/the/ is "the other half" a response, or ...; can you clarify, "the other half" doesn't seem very specific. 3) in 3.8 "this looks weird". I don't think the problem is that it looks weird; it's that the peer might respond to the fact that it looks weird and do something like discard it or filter it, and this would cause problems. Simply saying "it looks weird" doesn't really describe this in a clear and unambiguous manner. 4) "Reply packets might arrive ..." I think this should be discussed in the security considerations 5) in section 2, PAD needs to be spelled out or referenced. 6) aren't RFC2119, IKEv2bis and 4306 normative? Others may be also, but these seem obvious.
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2010-06-30)
Unknown
INTRODUCTION, paragraph 4: > An agreed terminology, problem statement and > requirements will allow the IPSECME WG to consider development of > IPsec/IKEv2 mechanisms to simplify cluster implementations. Suggest to remove text that talks about IETF WGs, which are after all ephemeral, from this document before publication as an RFC.
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Tim Polk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
(was Yes)
Recuse
Recuse
()
Unknown