Skip to main content

Dynamic Hostname Exchange Mechanism for IS-IS
draft-ietf-isis-rfc2763bis-00

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2012-08-22
00 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Chris Newman
2012-08-22
00 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Pasi Eronen
2012-08-22
00 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Lars Eggert
2008-07-23
00 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2008-07-23
00 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress
2008-07-23
00 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2008-07-23
00 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2008-07-22
00 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2008-07-22
00 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2008-07-22
00 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2008-07-22
00 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2008-07-22
00 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2008-07-22
00 Ross Callon State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Ross Callon
2008-07-22
00 Pasi Eronen [Ballot Position Update] Position for Pasi Eronen has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Pasi Eronen
2008-07-22
00 Pasi Eronen [Ballot Position Update] Position for Pasi Eronen has been changed to Undefined from Discuss by Pasi Eronen
2008-07-17
00 Chris Newman [Ballot Position Update] Position for Chris Newman has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Chris Newman
2008-07-13
00 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] Position for Lars Eggert has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Lars Eggert
2008-07-04
00 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2008-07-03
2008-07-03
00 Cindy Morgan State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan
2008-07-03
00 Mark Townsley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Mark Townsley
2008-07-03
00 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund
2008-07-03
00 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2008-07-03
00 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2008-07-03
00 Pasi Eronen
[Ballot discuss]
The document should say what a router should do if it receives a
(name, systemID) mapping for a name or systemID it already …
[Ballot discuss]
The document should say what a router should do if it receives a
(name, systemID) mapping for a name or systemID it already has a
(different) mapping for. Documenting what existing
implementations do would be sufficient.

The security considerations text should say where the existing
security considerations are discussed (e.g. in rfc3567bis).

There's also one new security consideration; here's my proposal for
text (rough sketch only; suggestions for better text are welcome if
the WG doesn't like this one):

"Since the name-to-systemID mapping relies on information provided by
the routers themselves, a misconfigured or compromised router can
inject false mapping information. Thus, this information needs to be
treated with suspicion when e.g. doing diagnostics about a suspected
security incident."
2008-07-03
00 Pasi Eronen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Pasi Eronen
2008-07-03
00 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jon Peterson
2008-07-02
00 Chris Newman
[Ballot discuss]
This document needs to describe its relationship to IDN (RFC 3490).  This
should be simple to fix.  I suggest one or …
[Ballot discuss]
This document needs to describe its relationship to IDN (RFC 3490).  This
should be simple to fix.  I suggest one or two sentences similar to:

The VALUE field is encoded in 7-bit ASCII.  If a user-interface for
configuring or displaying this field permits Unicode characters, that
user-interface is responsible for applying the ToASCII and/or ToUnicode
algorithm as described in RFC 3490 to achieve the correct format for
transmission or display.
2008-07-02
00 Chris Newman [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Chris Newman
2008-07-02
00 David Ward [Ballot Position Update] New position, Recuse, has been recorded by David Ward
2008-07-02
00 Lisa Dusseault [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lisa Dusseault
2008-07-02
00 Ron Bonica [Ballot comment]
If this document updates RFC 2763, the header should say that. But the RFC editor can take care of this point.
2008-07-02
00 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2008-07-02
00 Lars Eggert [Ballot comment]
Section 6., paragraph 2:
>    Others to be provided....

  Add names or remove paragraph.
2008-07-02
00 Lars Eggert
[Ballot discuss]
INTRODUCTION, paragraph 12:
>    The intention of this document is to provide an update to [RFC 2763].

  DISCUSS: I …
[Ballot discuss]
INTRODUCTION, paragraph 12:
>    The intention of this document is to provide an update to [RFC 2763].

  DISCUSS: I believe this obsoletes RFC2763 (instead of updating it).
  This also needs to be added to the first-page header.
2008-07-02
00 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2008-07-01
00 Ross Callon [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ross Callon
2008-07-01
00 Ross Callon Ballot has been issued by Ross Callon
2008-07-01
00 Ross Callon Created "Approve" ballot
2008-06-26
00 Ross Callon State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Ross Callon
2008-06-26
00 Ross Callon Placed on agenda for telechat - 2008-07-03 by Ross Callon
2008-06-23
00 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2008-06-18
00 Amanda Baber
IANA Last Call comments:

Upon approval of this document, the IANA will make the following
changes in the "IS-IS TLV Codepoints per [RFC3563]" …
IANA Last Call comments:

Upon approval of this document, the IANA will make the following
changes in the "IS-IS TLV Codepoints per [RFC3563]" registry at
http://www.iana.org/assignments/isis-tlv-codepoints
sub-registry "TLV Codepoints Registry"

OLD:

Name        Value IIH LSP SNP Status/Reference
------------ ----- --- --- --- ----------------
Dynamic Name 137  n  y  n  [RFC2763]


NEW:

Name        Value IIH LSP SNP Status/Reference
------------ ----- --- --- --- ----------------
Dynamic Name 137  n  y    n  [RFC2763][RFC-isis-rfc2763bis-00]


We understand the above to be the only IANA Action for this
document.
2008-06-09
00 Cindy Morgan Last call sent
2008-06-09
00 Cindy Morgan State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Cindy Morgan
2008-06-09
00 Ross Callon State Changes to Last Call Requested from IESG Evaluation by Ross Callon
2008-06-09
00 Ross Callon Last Call was requested by Ross Callon
2008-06-09
00 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2008-06-09
00 (System) Last call text was added
2008-06-09
00 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2008-06-09
00 Ross Callon Removed from agenda for telechat - 2008-06-19 by Ross Callon
2008-06-03
00 Ross Callon Placed on agenda for telechat - 2008-06-19 by Ross Callon
2008-06-03
00 Ross Callon State Changes to IESG Evaluation from AD Evaluation by Ross Callon
2008-06-03
00 Ross Callon State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested::External Party by Ross Callon
2008-04-09
00 Ross Callon Draft Added by Ross Callon in state Publication Requested
2007-09-30
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-isis-rfc2763bis-00.txt