A YANG Network Data Model for Inventory Topology Mapping
draft-ietf-ivy-network-inventory-topology-11
| Document | Type | Active Internet-Draft (ivy WG) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Bo Wu , Mohamed Boucadair , Cheng Zhou , Qin Wu | ||
| Last updated | 2026-09-26 (Latest revision 2026-09-11) | ||
| Replaces | draft-wzwb-ivy-network-inventory-topology | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | Proposed Standard | ||
| Formats | |||
| Yang Validation | 0 errors, 0 warnings | ||
| Reviews |
SECDIR IETF Last Call Review due 2026-09-28
Incomplete
|
||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | Submitted to IESG for Publication | |
| Associated WG milestone |
|
||
| Document shepherd | Olga Havel | ||
| Shepherd write-up | Show Last changed 2026-08-28 | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Waiting for AD Go-Ahead | |
| Action Holder | |||
| Consensus boilerplate | Yes | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | Mahesh Jethanandani | ||
| Send notices to | olga.havel@huawei.com | ||
| IANA | IANA review state | IANA - Not OK | |
| IANA expert review state | Reviews assigned |
draft-ietf-ivy-network-inventory-topology-11
Network Inventory YANG B. Wu, Ed.
Internet-Draft Huawei
Intended status: Standards Track M. Boucadair
Expires: 15 March 2027 Orange
C. Zhou
China Mobile
Q. Wu
Huawei
11 September 2026
A YANG Network Data Model for Inventory Topology Mapping
draft-ietf-ivy-network-inventory-topology-11
Abstract
This document specifies a YANG data model that extends the network
topology data model (RFC 8345) to map network topologies with
inventories. The data model introduces the "inventory-topology"
network type and augmentations for physical entity mappings and
capabilities, which may be used by any overlay network topology for
service provisioning validation, network maintenance, and capacity
planning.
Discussion Venues
This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.
Discussion of this document takes place on the Network Inventory YANG
Working Group mailing list (ivy@ietf.org), which is archived at
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ivy/.
Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
https://github.com/ietf-ivy-wg/network-inventory-topology.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Wu, et al. Expires 15 March 2027 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Inventory Topology Mapping September 2026
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 15 March 2027.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2026 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.1. Editorial Note (To be removed by RFC Editor) . . . . . . 3
2. Conventions and Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.1. Requirements Notations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3. Sample Use Cases of the Data Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.1. Determine Available Resources of Service Attachment Points
(SAPs) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.2. Multi-layer Network Navigation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.3. "What-if" Scenarios . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4. Module Tree Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4.1. Link Extensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4.2. Port-Breakout Capability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
5. Network Inventory Topology YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . 9
6. Operational Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
8. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
9.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
9.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Appendix A. 'link-type' Usage Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Appendix B. JSON Example of an Multi-fibre Push On (MPO)
Breakout-Channel Port . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Wu, et al. Expires 15 March 2027 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Inventory Topology Mapping September 2026
1. Introduction
[I-D.ietf-ivy-network-inventory-yang] defines the base network
inventory model to aggregate the inventory data of Network Elements
(NEs). This data includes identification of these NEs and their
hardware, firmware, and software components. Examples of inventory
hardware components could be rack, shelf, slot, board, or physical
port. Examples of inventory software components could be platform
Operating System (OS), software-modules, bios, or boot-loader
[I-D.ietf-ivy-network-inventory-software].
In order to ease navigation between inventory and network topologies,
this document extends the network topology data model [RFC8345] for
network inventory mapping: "ietf-network-inventory-topology"
(Section 5). The YANG data model in this document conforms to the
YANG data modeling language [RFC7950].
Similar to the base inventory data model
[I-D.ietf-ivy-network-inventory-yang], the network inventory topology
data model does not make any assumption about involved NEs and their
roles in topologies. As such, the mapping data model can be applied
independent of the network type (optical local loops, access network,
core network, etc.) and application.
Therefore, this YANG data model can be used to represent a physical
network instance at the lowest underlay abstraction level, as shown
in Section 4.4.9 of [RFC8345]. Alternatively, it can be used in
conjunction with existing network topology models, such as [RFC9408],
[RFC8944], [RFC8346], [RFC8795], and [I-D.ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang],
when they contain nodes, links, or termination points belonging to
the lowest underlay level.
1.1. Editorial Note (To be removed by RFC Editor)
Note to the RFC Editor: This section is to be removed prior to
publication.
This document contains placeholder values that need to be replaced
with finalized values at the time of publication. This note
summarizes all of the substitutions that are needed.
Please apply the following replacements:
* XXXX --> the assigned RFC number for this I-D
* AAAA --> the assigned RFC number for
[I-D.ietf-ivy-network-inventory-yang]
Wu, et al. Expires 15 March 2027 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Inventory Topology Mapping September 2026
* 2026-09-11 --> the actual date of the publication of this document
2. Conventions and Definitions
2.1. Requirements Notations
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
The following terms are defined in [RFC7950] and are not redefined
here:
* augment
* data model
* data node
The meanings of the symbols in the YANG tree diagrams are defined in
[RFC8340].
This document uses terms defined in
[I-D.ietf-ivy-network-inventory-yang].
The document adheres to the folding conventions in [RFC8792].
3. Sample Use Cases of the Data Model
3.1. Determine Available Resources of Service Attachment Points (SAPs)
The inventory topology data model provides a physical port reference
(port-ref) that enables correlation between logical topology entities
and physical inventory components. During service provisioning, the
SAP's parent-termination-point can be associated with the inventory
topology's port-ref to locate the underlying physical resource.
Wu, et al. Expires 15 March 2027 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Inventory Topology Mapping September 2026
Figure 1 illustrates the query interactions. During service
provisioning, the orchestrator can issue a query using the SAP data
model (e.g., obtaining a list of SAPs across multiple PEs as shown in
Appendix A of [RFC9408]), and then uses the inventory topology data
model to identify the physical port underlying each candidate SAP.
Specifically, the "parent-termination-point" of a SAP is mapped to
the corresponding "port-ref" in the inventory topology, allowing the
orchestrator to locate the physical resource. The orchestrator can
then consult other relevant topology models (e.g., [RFC8795]) to
verify whether the identified port has adequate capacity for the
requested service.
If the physical port underlying a candidate SAP has insufficient
resources (e.g., port speed fully utilized), the orchestrator can
select an alternate SAP that maps to a different port with adequate
capacity. If no alternative SAP is available, the orchestrator flags
the request for manual intervention, providing the operator with
precise inventory information about the bottleneck (e.g., "Port
GE0/6/1 on NE-PE1 is at 95% utilization"). The resource constraint
can also feed into a "what-if" analysis (see Section 3.3) to evaluate
hardware upgrades or alternative underlay paths.
.-----------------.
| Customer |
'--------+--------'
Customer Service request |
(e.g., L3SM and L2SM) v
.--------+--------.
| Service |
| Orchestration |
'------+---+------'
(1a) Query SAPs | | (1b) Map SAP to physical port
via SAP Data Model v v via Inventory Topology
.------+---+------.
| Network |
| Controller |
'--------+--------'
|
.---------------------+---------------------.
| Network |
'-------------------------------------------'
Figure 1: An Example Usage of Network Inventory Topology
Wu, et al. Expires 15 March 2027 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft Inventory Topology Mapping September 2026
3.2. Multi-layer Network Navigation
A multi-layer network encompasses multiple layers (e.g., Layer 2 and
Layer 3, or Optical Transport Network (OTN) and Wavelength Division
Multiplexing (WDM) layers).
A multi-layer network topology comprises nodes, links, and
termination points that can belong to different layers.
A multi-layer network can contain multiple types of topological
elements: physical elements (associated with an inventory element) or
logical elements (associated with topology elements in the underlay
layer).
The topology models support navigation across the different layers,
down to the physical layer, as defined in Section 4.4.9 of [RFC8345].
The navigation between the physical layer and the network inventory
is outside the scope of the topology models and is addressed in this
document.
This document augments both "ietf-network" (for nodes and network-
types) and "ietf-network-topology" (for links and termination
points), following the standard extension pattern described in
Section 4.3 of [RFC8345]. This augmentation associates inventory
data nodes with topology data nodes to support multi-layer navigation
across physical and logical resources.
To make this navigation operationally explicit, this module provides
concrete YANG data nodes in the "inventory-mapping-attributes"
container, where the leaf "ne-ref" links topology nodes to their
corresponding network elements, and the leaf "port-ref" links
termination points to their physical port components, thereby
enabling direct correlation between the [RFC8345] topology and the
underlying inventory.
3.3. "What-if" Scenarios
[I-D.irtf-nmrg-network-digital-twin-arch] defines Network Digital
Twin (NDT) as a virtual representation of the physical network. Such
representation is meant to be used to analyze, diagnose, emulate, and
then manage the physical network based on data, models, and
interfaces.
[I-D.ietf-nmop-simap-concept] defines Service and Infrastructure Maps
(SIMAP) as an abstraction model that provides a unified view of both
service and infrastructure information, enabling correlation between
service requirements and underlying resource capabilities.
Wu, et al. Expires 15 March 2027 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft Inventory Topology Mapping September 2026
Both architectures require accurate mapping between logical network
topology and physical inventory as a foundational data layer. This
model provides the essential physical resource information to such
systems, enabling them to perform accurate "what-if" analysis (e.g.,
impact prediction of hardware End-of-Life, path re-optimization under
resource constraints, service availability assessment).
4. Module Tree Structure
An overview of the structure of the "ietf-network-inventory-topology"
module is shown in Figure 2.
module: ietf-network-inventory-topology
augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:network-types:
+--rw inventory-topology!
augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node:
+--rw inventory-mapping-attributes!
+--rw ne-ref? nwi:ne-ref
augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nt:link:
+--rw inventory-mapping-attributes!
+--rw link-type? identityref
augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/nt:termination-point:
+--rw inventory-mapping-attributes!
| +--rw ne-ref? nwi:ne-ref
| +--rw port-ref? leafref
+--ro port-breakout!
+--ro breakout-channel* [channel-id]
+--ro channel-id uint16
Figure 2: The Structure of the Network Inventory Mapping Data Model
The module augments the "ietf-network-topology" module as follows:
Inventory mapping attributes for nodes, and termination points: The
corresponding containers augments the topology module with the
references to the base network inventory
4.1. Link Extensions
This document adds a lightweight "link-type" leaf to the topology
link mapping to enable basic physical media classification.
"link-type": An identityref indicating the link media type.
Examples of wired link types are "copper", "fiber", or "coax".
Wu, et al. Expires 15 March 2027 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft Inventory Topology Mapping September 2026
For wireless media, values such as "microwave", or "wlan" may be
used. See also [RFC9656] for more detailed microwave radio
attributes.
The "link-type" serves as a lightweight discriminator that guides
to the appropriate specialized inventory model for detailed
resource information.
For example, wired media ("fiber" or "copper") typically
references a passive network inventory model such as the one
defined in [I-D.ygb-ivy-passive-network-inventory].
4.2. Port-Breakout Capability
High-density Ethernet ports (e.g., 400 Gb/s DR4) can be split into
multiple independent lower-speed channels. The breakout channels
represent the intrinsic capability of the port to be partitioned,
regardless of whether the port is currently configured as a trunk or
as a breakout port.
A trunk port is associated with exactly one physical interface. A
breakout port is a port that is decomposed into two or more physical
interfaces; those interfaces may run at the same or different speeds
and may consume the same or a different number of breakout channels.
The container "port-breakout" is added under the termination-point
augmentation. It lists the logical channels into which the single
physical port can be divided. Only termination-points whose parent
port is breakout-capable need to instantiate the container; otherwise
the container is omitted, keeping the topology model minimal for the
common non-breakout case.
Breakout channel is an atomic resource element obtained by
partitioning a breakout port. One physical interface may be
associated with one or more breakout channels, but one breakout
channel MUST NOT be associated with more than one physical interface.
Appendix B provides a JSON instance [RFC7951] example for a port with
breakout capabilities.
Wu, et al. Expires 15 March 2027 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft Inventory Topology Mapping September 2026
It is assumed that a port which supports breakout can be configured
either as a trunk port or as a breakout port. The "port-breakout"
container serves as a capability advertisement for the termination-
point of the parent physical port. It does not provide direct
references or pointers to the resulting lower-speed termination-
points or interfaces. The correlation between a specific "channel-
id" and its corresponding lower-speed termination-point is outside
the scope of this document and is expected to be provided by a future
companion module. Interface channelisation (e.g., VLAN sub-
interfaces) is also outside the scope of this document and is
addressed by the Layer 2 network topology model [RFC8944].
5. Network Inventory Topology YANG Module
This module augments the Network Topology module defined in
[RFC8345].
This module imports the base network inventory
[I-D.ietf-ivy-network-inventory-yang].
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-network-inventory-topology@2026-09-11.yang"
module ietf-network-inventory-topology {
yang-version 1.1;
namespace
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-network-inventory-topology";
prefix nwit;
import ietf-network {
prefix nw;
reference
"RFC 8345: A YANG Data Model for Network Topologies,
Section 4.1";
}
import ietf-network-topology {
prefix nt;
reference
"RFC 8345: A YANG Data Model for Network Topologies,
Section 4.2";
}
import ietf-network-inventory {
prefix nwi;
reference
"RFC AAAA: A Base YANG Data Model for Network Inventory";
}
organization
"IETF Network Inventory YANG (ivy) Working Group";
contact
Wu, et al. Expires 15 March 2027 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft Inventory Topology Mapping September 2026
"WG Web: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/ivy
WG List: IVY <mailto:ivy@ietf.org>
Editor: Bo Wu
<lana.wubo@huawei.com>
Editor: Mohamed Boucadair
<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Author: Cheng Zhou
<zhouchengyjy@chinamobile.com>
Author: Qin Wu
<bill.wu@huawei.com>";
description
"This module defines a YANG module for network
topology and inventory mapping.
Copyright (c) 2026 IETF Trust and the persons identified
as authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with
or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and
subject to the license terms contained in, the Revised
BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's
Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
All revisions of IETF and IANA published modules can be found
at the YANG Parameters registry group
(https://www.iana.org/assignments/yang-parameters).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see
the RFC itself for full legal notices.";
revision 2026-09-11 {
description
"Initial revision.";
reference
"RFC XXXX: A Network Data Model for Inventory Topology
Mapping";
}
identity link-type {
description
"Base identity for classifying the physical media type of a
link at the inventory topology layer. Additional identities
may be defined to cover other media types.";
}
identity copper {
Wu, et al. Expires 15 March 2027 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft Inventory Topology Mapping September 2026
base link-type;
description
"Copper-based physical link.";
}
identity fiber {
base link-type;
description
"Fiber-based physical link.";
}
identity coax {
base link-type;
description
"Coaxial cable-based physical link.";
}
identity microwave {
base link-type;
description
"Microwave-based wireless link.
Detailed microwave radio attributes are defined in the
microwave topology data model.";
reference
"RFC 9656: A YANG Data Model for Microwave Topology";
}
identity wlan {
base link-type;
description
"IEEE 802.11 wireless link.";
}
identity unknown {
base link-type;
description
"The link media type is unknown or could not be determined.
This identity is used as a fallback when the physical medium
cannot be classified into any of the other defined types.
When a discovery system is unable to determine the media
type, it should use this identity rather than leaving the
leaf unset. An unset leaf indicates that the link type has
not been assessed, whereas unknown explicitly records that
the medium could not be classified.";
}
Wu, et al. Expires 15 March 2027 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft Inventory Topology Mapping September 2026
identity leased-fiber {
base fiber;
description
"Leased fiber link. The physical medium is fiber, but the link
is provided by a third-party operator. Detailed physical
attributes are typically not visible to the lessee.";
}
augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:network-types" {
description
"Introduces a new network type for inventory topology
mapping.";
container inventory-topology {
presence
"Indicates a physical network topology, containing
physical-layer attributes including inventory mapping, port
breakout capabilities, and link media types.";
description
"Container for the inventory-topology network type.
When present, it signals that the network contains
physical-layer augmentations as defined in this module.
This network type is typically discovered by the network
controller to identify a physical underlay network; it may
be configured manually when discovery is not available.
This network type is intended to serve as the underlay
for logical network topologies (Layer 2, Layer 3,
Traffic Engineering (TE), etc.).";
}
}
augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node" {
when '../nw:network-types/nwit:inventory-topology';
description
"Augments the network topology node with inventory mapping
attributes. This enables correlation between the logical node
and its physical network element.";
container inventory-mapping-attributes {
presence
"If present, it indicates this is a physical node, which
maps to a network element. If not present, it indicates it
is an abstract node.";
description
"Container for inventory mapping attributes of a node.";
leaf ne-ref {
type nwi:ne-ref;
description
Wu, et al. Expires 15 March 2027 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft Inventory Topology Mapping September 2026
"Reference to the NE in the inventory that corresponds to
this topology node.
This reference establishes a 1:1 mapping between the
logical node and its physical NE.";
}
}
}
augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nt:link" {
when '../nw:network-types/nwit:inventory-topology';
description
"Augments the network topology link with inventory-related
attributes.";
container inventory-mapping-attributes {
presence "Indicates a physical link, at the lowest underlay
abstraction level.";
description
"Container for inventory-related attributes of a link.
This container provides lightweight media classification.
The link-type indicates which specialized inventory model
contains detailed resource information:
- Wired media (fiber, copper): passive network inventory
- Wireless media (microwave, wlan): wireless-specific
inventory
Detailed inventory references may be added in future
modules.";
leaf link-type {
type identityref {
base link-type;
}
description
"Classification of the link media type at the topology
layer.
The base identity 'link-type' is extensible. Examples
of derived identities include 'copper', 'fiber',
'coax', 'microwave', and 'wlan'.
This leaf serves as a lightweight discriminator. When
the value is 'microwave', detailed microwave link
attributes are defined in the microwave topology data
model. Wired media (e.g., fiber, copper, or coax) may
be detailed in a passive network inventory data
model.";
Wu, et al. Expires 15 March 2027 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft Inventory Topology Mapping September 2026
}
}
}
augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/nt:termination-point" {
when '../../nw:network-types/nwit:inventory-topology';
description
"Augments the termination point (TP) with inventory mapping
and port breakout.";
container inventory-mapping-attributes {
presence
"If present, it indicates this is a physical TP, which
maps to a port component. If not present, it indicates it
is a logical TP.";
description
"Container for inventory mapping attributes of a TP.";
uses nwi:port-ref {
refine "port-ref" {
description
"Reference to the physical port component in the
network inventory. This reference establishes a 1:1
mapping between the logical TP and its physical port
component.";
}
}
}
container port-breakout {
presence "Indicates the port supports channel breakout.";
config false;
description
"Breakout capability of the physical port represented by
this TP. One TP maps to one physical port; channels are
listed here. This container is present only when the
underlying hardware supports partitioning the port into
multiple independent channels (e.g., 400G to 4x100G).";
list breakout-channel {
key "channel-id";
description
"Indicates the list of breakout channels available
on this port. Each entry represents an independent lane
or sub-port that can be used for channelized
interfaces.";
leaf channel-id {
type uint16;
description
"Records a unique identifier for the breakout channel
within the scope of the parent port.";
}
Wu, et al. Expires 15 March 2027 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft Inventory Topology Mapping September 2026
}
}
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
6. Operational Considerations
The "ietf-network-inventory-topology" YANG module enables a network
controller to report discovered network topology and inventory
information. Automatic discovery serves as the primary mechanism,
with selective configuration capabilities provided for scenarios
where discovery is not feasible.
For typical operations such as service provisioning and network
planning, the model offers read-only query access to authoritative
mappings between logical topology and physical inventory. The
inventory-mapping-attributes containers are defined as read-write
(config true) to accommodate cases where automatic discovery is not
possible, including:
* Customer Premises Equipment (CPE) outside the operator's
management domain
* Leased lines and third-party transport resources
* Planned or hypothetical resources for future deployment
In these cases, the operator manually configures the mapping to
maintain accurate topology-to-inventory correlation.
The following nodes are read-only (config false) as they represent
hardware-determined state:
port-breakout: Hardware capability determined by physical port
characteristics
Therefore, in typical deployments, "ne-ref", "port-ref", and "link-
type" SHOULD be populated through automatic discovery but MAY only be
overridden manually in exceptional cases (e.g., CPE, leased lines, or
planned resources). The "port-breakout" container MUST always
reflect hardware-determined state and therefore MUST NOT be manually
configured.
Wu, et al. Expires 15 March 2027 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft Inventory Topology Mapping September 2026
The "inventory-topology" presence container under "network-types" is
typically set by the network controller when it discovers or
provisions network instance representing the physical layer. It MAY
be configured manually to declare a network as an inventory topology
when discovery is not available.
7. Security Considerations
This section is modeled after the template described in Section 3.7.1
of [RFC9907].
The "ietf-network-inventory-topology" YANG module defines a data
model that is designed to be accessed via YANG-based management
protocols, such as Network Configuration (NETCONF) [RFC6241] and
RESTCONF [RFC8040]. These YANG-based management (1) have to use a
secure transport layer and (2) have to use mutual authentication
(e.g., Secure Shell (SSH) [RFC4252], TLS [RFC9846], and QUIC
[RFC9000]).
The Network Configuration Access Control Model (NACM) [RFC8341]
provides the means to restrict access for particular NETCONF or
RESTCONF users to a preconfigured subset of all available NETCONF or
RESTCONF protocol operations and content.
There are a number of data nodes defined in this YANG module that are
writable/creatable/deletable (i.e., "config true", which is the
default). All writable data nodes are likely to be sensitive or
vulnerable in some network environments. Write operations (e.g.,
edit-config) and delete operations to these data nodes without proper
protection or authentication can have a negative effect on network
operations. The following subtrees and data nodes have particular
sensitivities/vulnerabilities:
'ne-ref', 'port-ref', and 'link-type': These nodes are sensitive
as they establish the mapping between logical topology and
physical inventory. Incorrect inventory mapping (e.g., stale
or manually misconfigured 'ne-ref' or 'port-ref' values) may
lead to mis-provisioning of services or misinterpretation of
physical resource availability, which can result in failed
service activation, unexpected traffic paths, or inaccurate
capacity planning.
Some of the readable data nodes in this YANG module may be considered
sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus
important to control read access (e.g., via get, get-config, or
notification) to these data nodes. Specifically, the following
subtrees and data nodes have particular sensitivities/
vulnerabilities:
Wu, et al. Expires 15 March 2027 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft Inventory Topology Mapping September 2026
'ne-ref', 'port-ref', and 'link-type': These nodes are sensitive
as they reveal network infrastructure details. 'ne-ref' may be
used to track the set of network elements; 'port-ref' discloses
internal port and component naming; 'link-type' can reveal
infrastructure ownership (e.g., the 'leased-fiber' identity
distinguishes third-party transport from owned infrastructure).
'port-breakout': This node exposes hardware capabilities.
There are no particularly sensitive RPC or action operations defined
in this module.
As this module augments the network topology model defined in
[RFC8345], the module also inherits the security considerations
discussed in Section 8 of [RFC8345] for the underlying network
topology data model.
8. IANA Considerations
IANA is requested to register the following URI in the "ns"
subregistry within the "IETF XML Registry" [RFC3688]:
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-network-inventory-topology
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A; the requested URI is an XML namespace.
IANA is requested to register the following YANG module in the "YANG
Module Names" registry [RFC6020] within the "YANG Parameters"
registry group:
Name: ietf-network-inventory-topology
Maintained by IANA? N
Namespace:
urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-network-inventory-topology
Prefix: nwit
Reference: RFC XXXX
9. References
9.1. Normative References
[I-D.ietf-ivy-network-inventory-yang]
Yu, C., Belotti, S., Bouquier, J., Peruzzini, F., and P.
Bedard, "A Base YANG Data Model for Network Inventory",
Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-ivy-network-
inventory-yang-18, 27 May 2026,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ivy-
network-inventory-yang-18>.
Wu, et al. Expires 15 March 2027 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft Inventory Topology Mapping September 2026
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119>.
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3688>.
[RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for
the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6020>.
[RFC7950] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language",
RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7950>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174>.
[RFC8341] Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration
Access Control Model", STD 91, RFC 8341,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8341, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8341>.
[RFC8345] Clemm, A., Medved, J., Varga, R., Bahadur, N.,
Ananthakrishnan, H., and X. Liu, "A YANG Data Model for
Network Topologies", RFC 8345, DOI 10.17487/RFC8345, March
2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8345>.
9.2. Informative References
[I-D.ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang]
Zheng, H., Busi, I., Liu, X., Belotti, S., and O. G. de
Dios, "A YANG Data Model for Optical Transport Network
Topology", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-
ccamp-otn-topo-yang-21, 16 June 2026,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-
otn-topo-yang-21>.
Wu, et al. Expires 15 March 2027 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft Inventory Topology Mapping September 2026
[I-D.ietf-ivy-network-inventory-software]
Wu, B., Zhou, C., Wu, Q., and M. Boucadair, "A YANG
Network Data Model of Network Inventory Software
Extensions", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-
ivy-network-inventory-software-04, 6 July 2026,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ivy-
network-inventory-software-04>.
[I-D.ietf-nmop-simap-concept]
Havel, O., Claise, B., de Dios, O. G., and T. Graf,
"SIMAP: Concept, Requirements, and Use Cases", Work in
Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-nmop-simap-concept-
13, 4 September 2026,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-nmop-
simap-concept-13>.
[I-D.irtf-nmrg-network-digital-twin-arch]
Zhou, C., Yang, H., Duan, X., Lopez, D., Pastor, A., Wu,
Q., Boucadair, M., and C. Jacquenet, "Network Digital Twin
(NDT): Concepts and Reference Architecture", Work in
Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-irtf-nmrg-network-digital-
twin-arch-13, 1 July 2026,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-irtf-nmrg-
network-digital-twin-arch-13>.
[I-D.ygb-ivy-passive-network-inventory]
Guo, A., van caenegem, T., Davis, N., Tilocca, M., and B.
Peters, "A YANG Data Model for Passive Network Inventory",
Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ygb-ivy-passive-
network-inventory-05, 26 May 2026,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ygb-ivy-
passive-network-inventory-05>.
[RFC4252] Ylonen, T. and C. Lonvick, Ed., "The Secure Shell (SSH)
Authentication Protocol", RFC 4252, DOI 10.17487/RFC4252,
January 2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4252>.
[RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
(NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6241>.
[RFC7951] Lhotka, L., "JSON Encoding of Data Modeled with YANG",
RFC 7951, DOI 10.17487/RFC7951, August 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7951>.
Wu, et al. Expires 15 March 2027 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft Inventory Topology Mapping September 2026
[RFC8040] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF
Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8040>.
[RFC8340] Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams",
BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8340>.
[RFC8346] Clemm, A., Medved, J., Varga, R., Liu, X.,
Ananthakrishnan, H., and N. Bahadur, "A YANG Data Model
for Layer 3 Topologies", RFC 8346, DOI 10.17487/RFC8346,
March 2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8346>.
[RFC8792] Watsen, K., Auerswald, E., Farrel, A., and Q. Wu,
"Handling Long Lines in Content of Internet-Drafts and
RFCs", RFC 8792, DOI 10.17487/RFC8792, June 2020,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8792>.
[RFC8795] Liu, X., Bryskin, I., Beeram, V., Saad, T., Shah, H., and
O. Gonzalez de Dios, "YANG Data Model for Traffic
Engineering (TE) Topologies", RFC 8795,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8795, August 2020,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8795>.
[RFC8944] Dong, J., Wei, X., Wu, Q., Boucadair, M., and A. Liu, "A
YANG Data Model for Layer 2 Network Topologies", RFC 8944,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8944, November 2020,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8944>.
[RFC9000] Iyengar, J., Ed. and M. Thomson, Ed., "QUIC: A UDP-Based
Multiplexed and Secure Transport", RFC 9000,
DOI 10.17487/RFC9000, May 2021,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9000>.
[RFC9408] Boucadair, M., Ed., Gonzalez de Dios, O., Barguil, S., Wu,
Q., and V. Lopez, "A YANG Network Data Model for Service
Attachment Points (SAPs)", RFC 9408, DOI 10.17487/RFC9408,
June 2023, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9408>.
[RFC9656] Mansfield, S., Ed., Ahlberg, J., Ye, M., Li, X., and D.
Spreafico, "A YANG Data Model for Microwave Topology",
RFC 9656, DOI 10.17487/RFC9656, September 2024,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9656>.
[RFC9846] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
Version 1.3", RFC 9846, DOI 10.17487/RFC9846, July 2026,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9846>.
Wu, et al. Expires 15 March 2027 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft Inventory Topology Mapping September 2026
[RFC9907] Bierman, A., Boucadair, M., Ed., and Q. Wu, "Guidelines
for Authors and Reviewers of Documents Containing YANG
Data Models", BCP 216, RFC 9907, DOI 10.17487/RFC9907,
March 2026, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9907>.
Appendix A. 'link-type' Usage Examples
This appendix provides examples illustrating the usage of the "link-
type" data node.
Scenario: Device "SW-1" and device "SW-2" are directly connected by a
fiber.
Physical topology:
.--------. .--------.
| | | |
| SW-1 +========= fiber link ===============+ SW-2 |
| | | |
'--------' '--------'
Key parts of the JSON example are as follows:
=============== NOTE: '\' line wrapping per RFC 8792 ================
{
"ietf-network:networks": {
"network": [
{
"network-id": "example:campus-topology",
"network-types": {
"ietf-network-inventory-topology:inventory-topology": {}
},
"node": [
{
"node-id": "example:SW-1",
"ietf-network-inventory-topology:inventory-mapping-\
attributes": {
"ne-ref": "example:NE-SW1"
},
"ietf-network-topology:termination-point": [
{
"tp-id": "example:TP-SW1-P1",
"ietf-network-inventory-topology:inventory-mapping-\
attributes": {
"ne-ref": "example:NE-SW1",
"port-ref": "/nwi:network-inventory/nwi:network-\
elements/nwi:network-element[ne-id='example:NE-SW1']/nwi:components/\
Wu, et al. Expires 15 March 2027 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft Inventory Topology Mapping September 2026
nwi:component[component-id='eth-port-1']"
}
}
]
},
{
"node-id": "example:SW-2",
"ietf-network-inventory-topology:inventory-mapping-\
attributes": {
"ne-ref": "example:NE-SW2"
},
"ietf-network-topology:termination-point": [
{
"tp-id": "example:TP-SW2-P1",
"ietf-network-inventory-topology:inventory-mapping-\
attributes": {
"ne-ref": "example:NE-SW2",
"port-ref": "/nwi:network-inventory/nwi:network-\
elements/nwi:network-element[ne-id='NE-SW2']/nwi:components/nwi:\
component[component-id='eth-port-1']"
}
}
]
}
],
"ietf-network-topology:link": [
{
"link-id": "example:Link-SW1-SW2",
"source": {
"source-node": "example:SW-1",
"source-tp": "example:TP-SW1-P1"
},
"destination": {
"dest-node": "example:SW-2",
"dest-tp": "example:TP-SW2-P1"
},
"ietf-network-inventory-topology:inventory-mapping-\
attributes": {
"link-type": "ietf-network-inventory-topology:fiber"
}
}
]
}
]
}
}
Wu, et al. Expires 15 March 2027 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft Inventory Topology Mapping September 2026
Appendix B. JSON Example of an Multi-fibre Push On (MPO) Breakout-
Channel Port
This appendix provides an example of a 400 Gb/s DR4 port that is
physically implemented as four independent 100 Gb/s lanes (an MPO
breakout). The lanes are exposed as breakout-channel entries so that
the port can later be configured as either a single 400G trunk or
four 100G breakout interfaces. The instance data below shows the
minimal JSON encoding [RFC7951] of the "port-breakout" container for
this port.
Wu, et al. Expires 15 March 2027 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft Inventory Topology Mapping September 2026
=============== NOTE: '\' line wrapping per RFC 8792 ================
{
"ietf-network:networks": {
"network": [
{
"network-id": "example:underlay-topology-400g",
"network-types": {
"ietf-network-inventory-topology:inventory-topology": {}
},
"node": [
{
"node-id": "example:n1",
"ietf-network-topology:termination-point": [
{
"tp-id": "example:400g-1/0/1",
"ietf-network-inventory-topology:inventory-mapping-\
attributes": {
"ne-ref": "example:NE-1",
"port-ref": "example:port-1"
},
"ietf-network-inventory-topology:port-breakout": {
"breakout-channel": [
{
"channel-id": 1
},
{
"channel-id": 2
},
{
"channel-id": 3
},
{
"channel-id": 4
}
]
}
}
]
}
]
}
]
}
}
Wu, et al. Expires 15 March 2027 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft Inventory Topology Mapping September 2026
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Italo Busi, Olga Havel, Aihua Guo, Oscar
Gonzalez de Dios, and many others for their helpful comments and
suggestions.
Thanks to Olga Havel for the detailed shepherd review.
Contributors
Chaode Yu
Huawei
Email: yuchaode@huawei.com
Authors' Addresses
Bo Wu (editor)
Huawei
Email: lana.wubo@huawei.com
Mohamed Boucadair
Orange
Email: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
Cheng Zhou
China Mobile
Email: zhouchengyjy@chinamobile.com
Qin Wu
Huawei
Email: bill.wu@huawei.com
Wu, et al. Expires 15 March 2027 [Page 25]