Skip to main content

IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ivy-network-inventory-topology-11
review-ietf-ivy-network-inventory-topology-11-genart-lc-housley-2026-09-16-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-ivy-network-inventory-topology
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 11)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2026-09-28
Requested 2026-09-12
Requested by Mahesh Jethanandani
Authors Bo Wu , Mohamed Boucadair , Cheng Zhou , Qin Wu
I-D last updated 2026-09-26 (Latest revision 2026-09-11)
Completed reviews Yangdoctors Early review of -06 by Andy Bierman (diff)
Opsdir Early review of -06 by Samier Barguil (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -11 by Russ Housley
Assignment Reviewer Russ Housley
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-ivy-network-inventory-topology by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/dTRnG90i58Ne1vbHoH9wXapSSTs
Reviewed revision 11
Result Ready
Completed 2026-09-16
review-ietf-ivy-network-inventory-topology-11-genart-lc-housley-2026-09-16-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at
<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-ivy-network-inventory-topology-11
Reviewer: Russ Housley
Review Date: 2026-09-16
IETF LC End Date: 2026-09-26
IESG Telechat date: unknown


Summary: Ready


Major Concerns:

None


Minor Concerns:

Section 2: Please merge Section 2 and Section 2.1.

Section 6 includes:

   Therefore, in typical deployments, "ne-ref", "port-ref", and "link-
   type" SHOULD be populated through automatic discovery but MAY only be
   overridden manually in exceptional cases (e.g., CPE, leased lines, or
   planned resources).

The phrase "MAY only" seems to contradict the ususal definition of MAY.
I suggest dropping "only" from the sentence.


Nits:

Section 7: s/no particularly sensitive RPC/no sensitive RPC/