IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ivy-network-inventory-topology-11
review-ietf-ivy-network-inventory-topology-11-genart-lc-housley-2026-09-16-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-ivy-network-inventory-topology |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 11) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2026-09-28 | |
| Requested | 2026-09-12 | |
| Requested by | Mahesh Jethanandani | |
| Authors | Bo Wu , Mohamed Boucadair , Cheng Zhou , Qin Wu | |
| I-D last updated | 2026-09-26 (Latest revision 2026-09-11) | |
| Completed reviews |
Yangdoctors Early review of -06
by Andy Bierman
(diff)
Opsdir Early review of -06 by Samier Barguil (diff) Genart IETF Last Call review of -11 by Russ Housley |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Russ Housley |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-ivy-network-inventory-topology by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/dTRnG90i58Ne1vbHoH9wXapSSTs | |
| Reviewed revision | 11 | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2026-09-16 |
review-ietf-ivy-network-inventory-topology-11-genart-lc-housley-2026-09-16-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. Document: draft-ietf-ivy-network-inventory-topology-11 Reviewer: Russ Housley Review Date: 2026-09-16 IETF LC End Date: 2026-09-26 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Ready Major Concerns: None Minor Concerns: Section 2: Please merge Section 2 and Section 2.1. Section 6 includes: Therefore, in typical deployments, "ne-ref", "port-ref", and "link- type" SHOULD be populated through automatic discovery but MAY only be overridden manually in exceptional cases (e.g., CPE, leased lines, or planned resources). The phrase "MAY only" seems to contradict the ususal definition of MAY. I suggest dropping "only" from the sentence. Nits: Section 7: s/no particularly sensitive RPC/no sensitive RPC/