Skip to main content

Frame Relay over Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol Version 3 (L2TPv3)
draft-ietf-l2tpext-pwe3-fr-07

Yes

(Margaret Cullen)

No Objection

(Alex Zinin)
(Bert Wijnen)
(Bill Fenner)
(Brian Carpenter)
(David Kessens)
(Jon Peterson)
(Russ Housley)
(Sam Hartman)
(Scott Hollenbeck)
(Ted Hardie)

Recuse

(Mark Townsley)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.

Margaret Cullen Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Alex Zinin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Allison Mankin Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2005-09-16) Unknown
Said it needed an applicability statement (fidelity to the link behavior) as per the PWE3 charter.
On clearing wrote:

Mark, Carlos, Ron, Margaret,

The new applicability statements are quite good, and
I've clear my Discusses. I just have a question.

They both end by saying that the capabilities of the LCCE (which
I think means RFC 3991) and the underlying PSN may provide
QoS to support features.  In FR: CIR, bc, be, and HDLC: better
faithfulness.

My question is for my better future understanding:  what is the
plane of interaction with the PSN; what RFC 3991 feature or other
channel exists through which the underlying QoS support is possible?
For FR, is support even good for FECN and BECN and DE.  I need
enlightenment here:  I don't have a clear picture about L2TPv3
capability of gathering congestion information from the underlying
PSN.

I'm removing my Discuss because I think the applicability
statements don't make claims that these features are faithfully
provided so much as they state that someone deploying could
do engineering to get some emulation into place.  This is
good enough.  But I'd be curious about the basic approach if
anyone has time to enlighten me :)

Thanks very much for the new sections!
Bert Wijnen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Bill Fenner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Brian Carpenter Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Scott Hollenbeck Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
Recuse
Recuse () Unknown