Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP): Shared Extension Message & IANA Registry for Packet Type Allocations
draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8113bis-03
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.
Alvaro Retana No Objection
Warren Kumari No Objection
Thank you!
(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) Yes
(Adam Roach; former steering group member) No Objection
(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection
(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) No Objection
§4: Is 6833bis likely to progress soon? Is their risk of changes there that might invalidate this statement?
(Benjamin Kaduk; former steering group member) No Objection
(Eric Rescorla; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ignas Bagdonas; former steering group member) No Objection
(Martin Vigoureux; former steering group member) No Objection
(Mirja Kühlewind; former steering group member) No Objection
(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection
(Suresh Krishnan; former steering group member) No Objection
* Section 5.1. LISP Packet Types "The values in the ranges 5-7 and 9-14 can be assigned via Standards Action [RFC8126]." Since LISP-DDT already used up packet type 6 this text probably needs to get updated.
(Terry Manderson; former steering group member) No Objection