IP Mobility Support for IPv4, Revised
draft-ietf-mip4-rfc3344bis-10
Yes
(Jari Arkko)
No Objection
(Dan Romascanu)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Lars Eggert)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Ross Callon)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Tim Polk)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
(was Discuss, Yes)
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2010-04-15)
Unknown
Jari tells me that the Erratum has now been rejected based on WG consensus. I will clear my Discuss.
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2010-03-08)
Unknown
The Gen-ART Review by Miguel Garcia on 2010-03-08 raised a few
editorial issues. Please consider them. I would really like to
see the comments about Appendix G addressed, so it is repeated
here for convenience:
- The structure of Appendix G is a bit confusing. Section G.1 lists
the changes made since RFC 3344. Sections G.2 and G.3 list the Major
and Minor Changes, respectively, but it is not clear to me if these
are changes since RFC 3344 or they include earlier changes as well.
To add more confusion, Section G4 lists the changes since RFC 3344,
but wasn't this what Section G.1 is all about?
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2010-04-21)
Unknown
Two comments: 1) Sec 1.6: It's a little ODD that there's a requirement in the terminology section (see SPI paragraph). Can this be moved to somewhere else in the document? 2) Sec 1.9: r/it is recommended that new Mobile IP extensions follow one of the two new extension/it is RECOMMENDED that new Mobile IP extensions follow one of the two new extension ?
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Tim Polk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown