Mobile IPv6 Management Information Base
draft-ietf-mip6-mipv6-mib-07
Yes
(Margaret Cullen)
No Objection
(Alex Zinin)
(Allison Mankin)
(Bill Fenner)
(David Kessens)
(Jon Peterson)
(Mark Townsley)
(Russ Housley)
(Sam Hartman)
(Scott Hollenbeck)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.
Margaret Cullen Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Alex Zinin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Allison Mankin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Bert Wijnen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2005-06-09)
Unknown
W.r.t. Ted's comment on mip6BindingAdminStatus, I think it says that an operator can remove an entry by setting the status to 'inactive'. Once a row is 'inactive', the operator cannot set it back to active. For that a new row needs to get created by some internal or other means. Bert
Bill Fenner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Brian Carpenter Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2005-06-07)
Unknown
Comments from review by Mary Barnes - Boilerplate out of date - Dates within the MIB need updating. Also, is the LAST UPDATED date on page 7 (October 2004) still valid given the doc was last updated in March? - page 5: change the phrase "It comprises of..." to "It is comprised of" OR remove the "of" after "comprises" (3 occurrences)
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Scott Hollenbeck Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2005-06-09)
Unknown
Bert answered my question, so I'm removing the comment.