Skip to main content

Goals for IPv6 Site-Multihoming Architectures
draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-07

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2003-08-22
07 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2003-07-03
07 Natalia Syracuse State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Syracuse, Natalia
2003-07-01
07 Michael Lee State Changes to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent by Lee, Michael
2003-07-01
07 (System) IESG has approved the document
2003-06-27
07 Dinara Suleymanova State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation by Suleymanova, Dinara
2003-06-23
07 Randy Bush Status date has been changed to 2003-06-26 from
2003-06-16
07 Randy Bush State Changes to IESG Evaluation from IESG Evaluation  :: Revised ID Needed by Bush, Randy
2003-06-16
07 Randy Bush
revised I-D received which met the issue with

  This document outlines a set of goals for proposed new IPv6
  site-multihoming architectures. It is …
revised I-D received which met the issue with

  This document outlines a set of goals for proposed new IPv6
  site-multihoming architectures. It is recognised that this set of
  goals is ambitious and that some goals may conflict with others. The
  solution or solutions adopted may only be able to satisfy some of the
  goals presented here.
2003-06-13
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-07.txt
2003-06-11
07 Randy Bush
An Ops-Dir reviewer had the following comments:

Let's see: load balancing is not a realistic requirement.  For the
architecture to be automatic, we have to …
An Ops-Dir reviewer had the following comments:

Let's see: load balancing is not a realistic requirement.  For the
architecture to be automatic, we have to be dynamic and we've
proven that we don't know how to do that yet.  Even to give people
some tools seems to lead to abuse.  Who controls the balancing? 
The source?  The destination?  Don't say 'both'.  No packet can
serve two masters.

Performance.  Exact same arguments since the only way to affect
performance is to load balance.

Policy: so ill stated as to be meaningless.  If this is a call
for policy routing, that's fine, but it has nothing to do with
multihoming.

Simplicity: motherhood, apple pie and chevrolet.

Transport survivability: Well, ok, but this is just a refinement
of the redundancy requirement.  How about we remove the redundant
redundancy
requirement?

Compatible with DNS: meaningless

Packet filtering: meaningless

Scalability: see simplicity

routers: create a new architecture, but don't change the routers, change
the hosts

hosts: create a new architecture, but don't change the hosts, change the
routers

Interaction between hosts & routers: tighter coupling between subsystems
has never been an architectural good idea.  So let's do that and change
both.

O&M: see pie, apple.

multiple solutions: please don't give us one size fits all, that's
not confusing enough

security: don't break security

Net:
The real requirements are:

- Provide multihoming
- Provide scalable routing
- Transport survivability
2003-06-11
07 Randy Bush State Changes to IESG Evaluation  :: Revised ID Needed from Publication Requested  :: External Party by Bush, Randy
2003-05-28
07 Randy Bush review requested of v6ops and grow wgs
2003-05-28
07 Randy Bush State Changes to Publication Requested  :: External Party from Publication Requested by Bush, Randy
2003-05-25
07 Randy Bush
wg last call complete, publication requested

Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 17:12:50 +0200
Subject: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-06.txt
Cc: Bert (Bert) Wijnen , Randy Bush ,
  Sean …
wg last call complete, publication requested

Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 17:12:50 +0200
Subject: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-06.txt
Cc: Bert (Bert) Wijnen , Randy Bush ,
  Sean Doran , Joe Abley
To: iesg-secretary@ietf.org
From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist

The multi6 WG have through a last-call verified consensus on the
document draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-06.txt and want to
request this to be published as an informational RFC.

Best regards,

- kurtis - / multi6 co-chair
2003-05-25
07 Randy Bush State Changes to Publication Requested from AD is watching by Bush, Randy
2003-05-16
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-06.txt
2003-04-17
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-05.txt
2003-04-04
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-04.txt
2003-03-19
07 Randy Bush wg still 'discussing' the draft
2003-03-19
07 Randy Bush wg still arguing about it
2003-03-19
07 Randy Bush Draft Added by Bush, Randy
2002-06-11
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03.txt
2001-11-27
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-02.txt
2001-06-26
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-01.txt
2001-03-22
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-00.txt