Adaptive Subscription to YANG Notifications
draft-ietf-netconf-adaptive-subscription-18

Approval announcement
Draft of message to be sent after approval:

Announcement

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-netconf-adaptive-subscription@ietf.org, mjethanandani@gmail.com, netconf-chairs@ietf.org, netconf@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, thomas.graf@swisscom.com
Subject: Document Action: 'Adaptive Subscription to YANG Notifications' to Experimental RFC (draft-ietf-netconf-adaptive-subscription-17.txt)

The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Adaptive Subscription to YANG Notifications'
  (draft-ietf-netconf-adaptive-subscription-17.txt) as Experimental RFC

This document is the product of the Network Configuration Working Group.

The IESG contact persons are Mahesh Jethanandani and Mohamed Boucadair.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-adaptive-subscription/

Ballot Text

Technical Summary

   This document defines a YANG data model and associated mechanism to
   enable adaptive subscriptions to YANG notifications.  The publisher
   can dynamically adjust the periodic update interval based on the
   evaluation of pre-configured conditions (e.g., thresholds or
   expressions).  This allows for finer-grained telemetry by increasing
   update frequency when certain criteria are met, and reducing it
   otherwise.

Working Group Summary

   Was there anything in the WG process that is worth noting?
   For example, was there controversy about particular points 
   or were there decisions where the consensus was
   particularly rough? 

From Shepherd's review:

During the working group process, the document received fair feedback from the
working group and OPS directorate and YANG doctors reviews. There was no
feedback on the working group last call.

Separately, the document did get a TSVART and SECDIR review both of which
stated that the document was ready.

Document Quality

   Are there existing implementations of the protocol?  Have a 
   significant number of vendors indicated their plan to
   implement the specification?  Are there any reviewers that
   merit special mention as having done a thorough review,
   e.g., one that resulted in important changes or a
   conclusion that the document had no substantive issues?  If
   there was a MIB Doctor, Media Type, or other Expert Review,
   what was its course (briefly)?  In the case of a Media Type
   Review, on what date was the request posted?

From Shepherd's review:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netconf-adaptive-subscription-09#section-6
describes 1 prototype implementation. Matches document intend to be
Experimental.

Personnel

   The Document Shepherd for this document is Thomas Graf. The Responsible
   Area Director is Mahesh Jethanandani.

RFC Editor Note

RFC Editor Note

There is a typo in Section 1.2, line 229 of the draft that was not caught in
-17:

"as well as the slection of 'eval-interval' parameter"

should be:

"as well as the selection of 'eval-interval' parameter"