OAuth 2.0 Proof-of-Possession: Authorization Server to Client Key Distribution
draft-ietf-oauth-pop-key-distribution-07
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (oauth WG) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last updated | 2019-09-28 (latest revision 2019-03-27) | ||
| Replaces | draft-bradley-oauth-pop-key-distribution | ||
| Stream | IETF | ||
| Intended RFC status | Proposed Standard | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
pdf
htmlized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | Kepeng Li | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | "Kepeng Li" <kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com> | ||
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-oauth-pop-key-distribution-07.txt
Abstract
RFC 6750 specified the bearer token concept for securing access to protected resources. Bearer tokens need to be protected in transit as well as at rest. When a client requests access to a protected resource it hands-over the bearer token to the resource server. The OAuth 2.0 Proof-of-Possession security concept extends bearer token security and requires the client to demonstrate possession of a key when accessing a protected resource.
Authors
John Bradley
(ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com)
Phil Hunt
(phil.hunt@yahoo.com)
Michael Jones
(mbj@microsoft.com)
Hannes Tschofenig
(Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net)
Mihaly Meszaros
(bakfitty@gmail.com)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)