OAuth 2.0 Proof-of-Possession: Authorization Server to Client Key Distribution
draft-ietf-oauth-pop-key-distribution-07
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(oauth WG)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | John Bradley , Phil Hunt , Michael B. Jones , Hannes Tschofenig , Mihaly Meszaros | ||
| Last updated | 2019-09-28 (Latest revision 2019-03-27) | ||
| Replaces | draft-bradley-oauth-pop-key-distribution | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | Proposed Standard | ||
| Formats | |||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | Kepeng Li | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | "Kepeng Li" <kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com> |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
RFC 6750 specified the bearer token concept for securing access to protected resources. Bearer tokens need to be protected in transit as well as at rest. When a client requests access to a protected resource it hands-over the bearer token to the resource server. The OAuth 2.0 Proof-of-Possession security concept extends bearer token security and requires the client to demonstrate possession of a key when accessing a protected resource.
Authors
John Bradley
Phil Hunt
Michael B. Jones
Hannes Tschofenig
Mihaly Meszaros
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)