OSPF Two-Part Metric
draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric-10

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.

(Alia Atlas) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

Deborah Brungard No Objection

(Ben Campbell) No Objection

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

Alissa Cooper No Objection

Comment (2016-10-10 for -09)
No email
send info
If the update to RFC 5340 is kept, it should be mentioned in the abstract.

(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

Comment (2016-10-12 for -09)
No email
send info
abstract: the text doesn't really explain anything to me.  But
then I'm not familiar with OSPF so maybe it's obvious to
someone who is.

intro: expanding LSA, VPLS etc on 1st use would be better.

3.1, 2nd bullet: the text here was very unclear to me

(All that said, the satellite/mobile ground station example 
does enough to ensure that the overall document is clear
so the above are nitty nits:-)

(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection

Comment (2016-10-11 for -09)
No email
send info
Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com> performed the opsdir review

(Suresh Krishnan) No Objection

(Mirja Kühlewind) No Objection

Comment (2016-10-10 for -09)
No email
send info
Two quick questions:

1) Why does this doc update 2328 and 5340? I would assume an TLV extension does not need to update the base protocol.

2) Why is the OSPFv3 extension described in a separate document?

(Alexey Melnikov) No Objection

Comment (2016-10-13 for -09)
No email
send info
Sorry for being dense, but:

3.2.  Advertising Network-to-Router Metric in OSPFv2

   For OSPFv2, the Network-to-Router metric is encoded in an OSPF
   Extended Link TLV Sub-TLV [RFC7684], defined in this document as the
   Network-to-Router Metric Sub-TLV.  The type of the Sub-TLV is TBD2.
   The length of the Sub-TLV is 4 (for the value part only).  The value
   part of the Sub-TLV is defined as follows:

       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |      MT       |        0      |          MT   metric          |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

I don't believe the document explains what are valid values of the MT field. Help?

(Kathleen Moriarty) No Objection