RTP Payload Format for Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) ST 336 Encoded Data
draft-ietf-payload-rtp-klv-04
Yes
(Robert Sparks)
No Objection
(Adrian Farrel)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Jari Arkko)
(Ralph Droms)
(Russ Housley)
(Sean Turner)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Wesley Eddy)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-03-05)
Unknown
[All comments addressed]
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-02-15)
Unknown
Although I agree that the $100 charge to obtain a copy of SMPTE 336M is unpleasant, RFC 3497 provides a precedent of normatively referencing a specification (SMPTE 292M) for which payment is required. Therefore I am balloting "No Objection".
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-02-15)
Unknown
I strongly support Adrian's DISCUSS. In fact, the IESG should probably issue guidance about this issue.
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-02-14)
Unknown
- What happens if the RTP packet with M=1 gets lost? It may be in there but I either missed it or didn't get it. - The normative [SMPTE336M] document costs $100 so I cannot check it. Maybe that's considered ok in this space but its quite odd for a standards-track RFC in general. Is there no way that that specification could be made available for free so that people can implement IETF standards without having to pay? That's highly desirable at least. (I assume the WG did specifically consider this and decided they were ok with it. Consider this an exhortation from outside the WG.)
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown