IPv7 Criteria Analysis for EIPIP
draft-ietf-pip-ipv7-analysis-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(pip WG)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Paul Francis , Dr. Zheng Wang | ||
| Last updated | 1992-11-13 | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Additional resources | thumper.bellcore.com%3A~/pub/tsuchiya/pip-archive | ||
| Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document describes how the IPv7 proposal called EIPIP (Extended IP using PIP) meets the evaluation criteria established by the Internet Engineering Steering Group and described in 'RFC-1380 IESG Deliberations on Routing and Addressing'. EIPIP is currently developed to be both a transition mechanism for a new IP protocol (PIP), and the new IP protocol. This document also includes how EIPIP meets the criteria described by Partridge/Kastenholz in their Internet Draft 'Criteria for Choosing IP Version 7 (IPv7)'.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)