Terminology for Post-Quantum Traditional Hybrid Schemes
draft-ietf-pquip-pqt-hybrid-terminology-06
Yes
(Orie Steele)
(Paul Wouters)
No Objection
Gunter Van de Velde
Jim Guichard
(Erik Kline)
(John Scudder)
(Murray Kucherawy)
(Zaheduzzaman Sarker)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.
Deb Cooley
Yes
Comment
(2025-01-06 for -05)
Sent
Thank you to Donald Eastlake for his secdir review. I thought this was comprehensive and easy to understand.
Roman Danyliw
Yes
Comment
(2025-01-08 for -05)
Not sent
Thank you for this document. Thank you to Roni Even for the GENART review.
Éric Vyncke
No Objection
Comment
(2025-01-06 for -05)
Sent
Thanks for the work done in this document, it was a relatively easy to read and understand for such a topic. Some minor comments: s/Post-Quantum Asymmetric Algorithm/Post-Quantum Asymmetric *Cryptographic* Algorithm/ to be similar to `Traditional Asymmetric Cryptographic Algorithm:`? Should the obvious be stated that there is no sense in a "Post-Quantum Certificate" that is signed by traditional signature ?
Gunter Van de Velde
No Objection
Jim Guichard
No Objection
Orie Steele Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -05)
Not sent
Paul Wouters Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -04)
Unknown
Erik Kline Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05)
Not sent
John Scudder Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05)
Not sent
Murray Kucherawy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05)
Not sent
Zaheduzzaman Sarker Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05)
Not sent