Skip to main content

Remote Attestation Procedures (RATS) Endorsements
draft-ietf-rats-endorsements-13

Approval announcement
Draft of message to be sent after approval:

Announcement

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-rats-endorsements@ietf.org, ned.smith.ietf@outlook.com, rats-chairs@ietf.org, rats@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, stndrds-inacio@andrew.cmu.edu, yogesh.deshpande@arm.com
Subject: Document Action: 'RATS Endorsements' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-rats-endorsements-09.txt)

The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'RATS Endorsements'
  (draft-ietf-rats-endorsements-09.txt) as Informational RFC

This document is the product of the Remote ATtestation ProcedureS Working
Group.

The IESG contact persons are Christopher Inacio and Deb Cooley.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rats-endorsements/


Ballot Text

Technical Summary

   In the IETF Remote Attestation Procedures (RATS) architecture, a
   Verifier accepts Evidence and uses Appraisal Policy for Evidence,
   typically with additional input from Endorsements and Reference
   Values, to generate Attestation Results in formats that are useful
   for Relying Parties.  This document illustrates the purpose and role
   of Endorsements and discusses some considerations in the choice of
   message format for Endorsements in the scope of the RATS
   architecture.

   This document does not aim to define a conceptual message format for
   Endorsements and Reference Values.  Instead, it extends RFC9334 to
   provide further details on Reference Values and Endorsements, as
   these topics were outside the scope of the RATS charter when RFC9334
   was developed.

Working Group Summary

  The only notable conversation with regards to this document was if instead of this draft that the a RFC9334-bis document instead of this additional document.  The WG decided to proceed with this document; the technical parts of the document had wide agreement. 

Document Quality

   This document explains the conceptual design and interactions of remote attestation endorsers and verifiers.  It does not directly have implementations or IANA registry items.  There are implementations of the overall remote attestation system.

Personnel

   The Document Shepherd for this document is Yogesh Deshpande. The
   Responsible Area Director is Christopher Inacio.

RFC Editor Note