Security Automation and Continuous Monitoring (SACM) Requirements
draft-ietf-sacm-requirements-18

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2017-09-21
18 (System)
Received changes through RFC Editor sync (created alias RFC 8248, changed abstract to 'This document defines the scope and set of requirements for the Security ...
2017-09-21
18 (System) RFC published
2017-09-21
18 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48
2017-09-14
18 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR
2017-08-30
18 (System) RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from EDIT
2017-08-22
18 Wesley Eddy Closed request for Last Call review by TSVART with state 'Overtaken by Events'
2017-08-07
18 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2017-08-07
18 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2017-08-07
18 (System) RFC Editor state changed to EDIT
2017-08-07
18 (System) IESG state changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2017-08-07
18 (System) Announcement was received by RFC Editor
2017-08-07
18 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2017-08-07
18 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2017-08-07
18 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2017-08-07
18 Cindy Morgan Ballot approval text was generated
2017-08-01
18 Nancy Cam-Winget New version available: draft-ietf-sacm-requirements-18.txt
2017-08-01
18 (System) New version approved
2017-08-01
18 (System) Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Nancy Cam-Winget <ncamwing@cisco.com>, Lisa Lorenzin <llorenzin@pulsesecure.net>
2017-08-01
18 Nancy Cam-Winget Uploaded new revision
2017-08-01
17 Ben Campbell
[Ballot comment]
Thanks for addressing my DISCUSS position and other comments. I am clearing my DISCUSS under the expectation that an upcoming revision will include ...
2017-08-01
17 Ben Campbell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ben Campbell has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2017-06-27
17 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2017-06-27
17 (System) IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - No Actions Needed
2017-06-27
17 Nancy Cam-Winget New version available: draft-ietf-sacm-requirements-17.txt
2017-06-27
17 (System) New version approved
2017-06-27
17 (System) Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Nancy Cam-Winget <ncamwing@cisco.com>, Lisa Lorenzin <llorenzin@pulsesecure.net>
2017-06-27
17 Nancy Cam-Winget Uploaded new revision
2017-06-27
16 Benoît Claise
[Ballot comment]
Hi Nancy,
> Hi Benoit,
> Thanks for the review and feedback.  Please see further comments below:
>
> On 6/21 ...
2017-06-27
16 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] Position for Benoit Claise has been changed to Abstain from No Objection
2017-06-26
16 Ben Campbell
[Ballot discuss]
(Resending because I forgot to hit the "send email" button this first time. No other change.)

The SACM charter requires the group to ...
2017-06-26
16 Ben Campbell Ballot discuss text updated for Ben Campbell
2017-06-22
16 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed from IESG Evaluation
2017-06-22
16 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
I generally dislike "requirements" documents, as most WG are not going to check final protocol against requirements. However I can see that such ...
2017-06-22
16 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alexey Melnikov
2017-06-21
16 Alia Atlas [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alia Atlas
2017-06-21
16 Adam Roach
[Ballot comment]
I see little value in spending RFC editor resources on publishing this document, but don't feel strongly enough about it to abstain ...
2017-06-21
16 Adam Roach [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adam Roach
2017-06-21
16 Ben Campbell
[Ballot discuss]
The SACM charter requires the group to " whenever reasonable and possible, reuse existing protocols, mechanisms, information and data models. " If that is reflected ...
2017-06-21
16 Ben Campbell
[Ballot comment]
General:

- I agree with the other abstain positions that the content in this draft doesn't seem to warrant publication as an RFC ...
2017-06-21
16 Ben Campbell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Ben Campbell
2017-06-21
16 Suresh Krishnan
[Ballot comment]
I do see the value of writing up the requirements to guide further work in the WG, but I do not see that ...
2017-06-21
16 Suresh Krishnan [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded for Suresh Krishnan
2017-06-21
16 Warren Kumari
[Ballot comment]
I spent a while trying to figure out how to ballot on this - I personally see value in requirements, use-cases and similar (informational ...
2017-06-21
16 Warren Kumari [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Warren Kumari
2017-06-21
16 Alissa Cooper
[Ballot comment]
I too don't see the particular value of having this published as an RFC, but understand that the WG may view it ...
2017-06-21
16 Alissa Cooper [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper
2017-06-21
16 Benoît Claise
[Ballot comment]
-    3.  The information model MUST accommodate the interoperable
        addition of new data types and/or schemas ...
2017-06-21
16 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2017-06-20
16 Terry Manderson
[Ballot comment]
I am balloting ABSTAIN on this document as I don't see strong value in a set of requirements as a standalone document ...
2017-06-20
16 Terry Manderson [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded for Terry Manderson
2017-06-20
16 Eric Rescorla
[Ballot comment]
    *  Large datagrams: It is possible that the size of posture
      assessment information can vary from a single ...
2017-06-20
16 Eric Rescorla [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Eric Rescorla
2017-06-20
16 Alvaro Retana
[Ballot comment]
I am ABSTAINing because I don't see publication value for this document given that the architecture and the information model are already ...
2017-06-20
16 Alvaro Retana [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana
2017-06-20
16 Deborah Brungard [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard
2017-06-19
16 Spencer Dawkins
[Ballot comment]
I'm following along with Mirja's Abstain, although I'm balloting No Objection.

I'm looking at

T-005  Transport Reliability: SACM transfer ...
2017-06-19
16 Spencer Dawkins Ballot comment text updated for Spencer Dawkins
2017-06-19
16 Spencer Dawkins
[Ballot comment]
I'm following along with Mirja's Abstain, although I'm balloting No Objection.

I'm looking at

T-005  Transport Reliability: SACM transfer ...
2017-06-19
16 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins
2017-06-19
16 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Ron Bonica.
2017-06-16
16 (System) IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed from Version Changed - Review Needed
2017-06-16
16 Mirja Kühlewind
[Ballot comment]
I abstain because I don’t think there is a achievable value in publishing this document in the RFC series (for consumption outside ...
2017-06-16
16 Mirja Kühlewind [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded for Mirja Kühlewind
2017-06-15
16 Kathleen Moriarty Ballot has been issued
2017-06-15
16 Kathleen Moriarty [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty
2017-06-15
16 Kathleen Moriarty Created "Approve" ballot
2017-06-15
16 Kathleen Moriarty Ballot writeup was changed
2017-06-15
16 Kathleen Moriarty IESG state changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup
2017-06-15
16 (System) IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - No Actions Needed
2017-06-15
16 Nancy Cam-Winget New version available: draft-ietf-sacm-requirements-16.txt
2017-06-15
16 (System) New version approved
2017-06-15
16 (System) Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Nancy Cam-Winget <ncamwing@cisco.com>, Lisa Lorenzin <llorenzin@pulsesecure.net>
2017-06-15
16 Nancy Cam-Winget Uploaded new revision
2017-06-11
15 Francis Dupont Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Almost Ready. Reviewer: Francis Dupont.
2017-06-09
15 Kathleen Moriarty Placed on agenda for telechat - 2017-06-22
2017-06-05
15 (System) IESG state changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call
2017-06-02
15 (System) IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed from IANA - Review Needed
2017-06-02
15 Sabrina Tanamal
(Via drafts-lastcall@iana.org): IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:

The IANA Services Operator has reviewed draft-ietf-sacm-requirements-15.txt, which is currently in Last Call, and has the ...
2017-05-30
15 Barry Leiba Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed: Has Nits. Reviewer: Barry Leiba. Sent review to list.
2017-05-30
15 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Ron Bonica
2017-05-26
15 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Barry Leiba
2017-05-25
15 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Francis Dupont
2017-05-24
15 Wesley Eddy Request for Last Call review by TSVART is assigned to Janardhan Iyengar
2017-05-22
15 Amy Vezza IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed
2017-05-22
15 Amy Vezza
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: sacm-chairs@ietf.org, sacm@ietf ...
2017-05-22
15 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2017-05-22
15 Kathleen Moriarty Last call was requested
2017-05-22
15 Kathleen Moriarty Ballot approval text was generated
2017-05-22
15 Kathleen Moriarty Ballot writeup was generated
2017-05-22
15 Kathleen Moriarty IESG state changed to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested
2017-05-22
15 Kathleen Moriarty IESG state changed to Publication Requested from AD is watching
2017-05-22
15 Kathleen Moriarty Last call announcement was generated
2017-05-07
15 Karen O'Donoghue Intended Status changed to Informational from None
2017-05-07
15 Karen O'Donoghue Changed consensus to Yes from Unknown
2017-05-07
15 Karen O'Donoghue
draft-ietf-sacm-requirements shepherd write-up

(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard, Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why is this the proper ...
2017-03-07
15 Kathleen Moriarty Tag Doc Shepherd Follow-up Underway set.
2016-12-27
15 Nancy Cam-Winget New version available: draft-ietf-sacm-requirements-15.txt
2016-12-27
15 (System) New version approved
2016-12-27
15 (System) Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: "Nancy Cam-Winget" <ncamwing@cisco.com>, "Lisa Lorenzin" <llorenzin@pulsesecure.net>
2016-12-27
15 Nancy Cam-Winget Uploaded new revision
2016-12-09
14 Kathleen Moriarty IESG state changed to AD is watching from AD Evaluation
2016-12-08
14 Kathleen Moriarty IESG state changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested
2016-11-14
14 Karen O'Donoghue
This is the publication request and document shepherd write up for:

UDP Checksum Complement in the Network Time Protocol (NTP)
draft-ietf-ntp-checksum-trailer-03.txtdraft-ietf-ntp-checksum-trailer

Prepared by: Karen ...
2016-11-14
14 Karen O'Donoghue Responsible AD changed to Kathleen Moriarty
2016-11-14
14 Karen O'Donoghue IETF WG state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from WG Document
2016-11-14
14 Karen O'Donoghue IESG state changed to Publication Requested
2016-11-14
14 Karen O'Donoghue IESG process started in state Publication Requested
2016-11-14
14 Karen O'Donoghue Changed document writeup
2016-11-14
14 Karen O'Donoghue Notification list changed to "Karen O'Donoghue" <odonoghue@isoc.org>
2016-11-14
14 Karen O'Donoghue Document shepherd changed to Karen O'Donoghue
2016-09-18
14 Nancy Cam-Winget New version approved
2016-09-18
14 Nancy Cam-Winget New version available: draft-ietf-sacm-requirements-14.txt
2016-09-18
14 Nancy Cam-Winget Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: "Nancy Cam-Winget" <ncamwing@cisco.com>, "Lisa Lorenzin" <llorenzin@pulsesecure.net>
2016-09-18
14 (System) Uploaded new revision
2016-09-18
13 (System) Document has expired
2016-03-17
13 Lisa Lorenzin New version available: draft-ietf-sacm-requirements-13.txt
2016-01-22
12 Nancy Cam-Winget New version available: draft-ietf-sacm-requirements-12.txt
2015-11-03
11 Nancy Cam-Winget New version available: draft-ietf-sacm-requirements-11.txt
2015-10-01
10 Nancy Cam-Winget New version available: draft-ietf-sacm-requirements-10.txt
2015-07-23
09 Lisa Lorenzin New version available: draft-ietf-sacm-requirements-09.txt
2015-07-21
08 Lisa Lorenzin New version available: draft-ietf-sacm-requirements-08.txt
2015-07-08
07 Naveen Khan New revision available
2015-05-20
06 Nancy Cam-Winget New version available: draft-ietf-sacm-requirements-06.txt
2015-05-09
05 Nancy Cam-Winget New version available: draft-ietf-sacm-requirements-05.txt
2015-03-08
04 Nancy Cam-Winget New version available: draft-ietf-sacm-requirements-04.txt
2015-01-03
03 Nancy Cam-Winget New version available: draft-ietf-sacm-requirements-03.txt
2014-10-25
02 Nancy Cam-Winget New version available: draft-ietf-sacm-requirements-02.txt
2014-10-10
01 Nancy Cam-Winget New version available: draft-ietf-sacm-requirements-01.txt
2014-09-08
00 Nancy Cam-Winget New version available: draft-ietf-sacm-requirements-00.txt