Skip to main content

Issues in candidate access router discovery for seamless IP-level handoffs
draft-ietf-seamoby-cardiscovery-issues-04

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
04 (System) Notify list changed from ,  to (None)
2004-01-15
04 (System) Document has expired
2003-10-27
04 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2003-10-27
04 (System) Last call text was added
2003-10-27
04 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2003-10-27
04 Allison Mankin State Changes to Dead from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Allison Mankin
2003-10-27
04 Allison Mankin WG declared this document should be scrapped
because CARD direction was changed so much - result of meeting in Vienna.
2003-10-27
04 Allison Mankin [Note]: 'WG declared this document should be scrapped
because CARD direction was changed so much - result of meeting in Vienna.' added by Allison Mankin
2002-11-25
04 Allison Mankin A new draft is ready for re-review by Randy, SMB and me - will try to resolve in concert with Nov 27 agenda timing...
2002-11-25
04 Allison Mankin State Changes to IESG Evaluation  :: AD Followup from IESG Evaluation  :: Revised ID Needed by Mankin, Allison
2002-10-17
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-seamoby-cardiscovery-issues-04.txt
2002-10-08
04 Allison Mankin State Changes to IESG Evaluation  -- New ID Needed from IESG Evaluation  -- Point Raised - writeup needed by mankin
2002-10-08
04 Allison Mankin Comment also provided by Randy Bush and will be sent to list 10/8/02.
2002-10-08
04 Allison Mankin by mankin
2002-10-04
04 Stephen Coya State Changes to IESG Evaluation  -- Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation by scoya
2002-10-04
04 Stephen Coya Randy to send note to Allison
2002-10-04
04 Stephen Coya Due date has been changed to 2002-10-03 from
by scoya
2002-09-26
04 Allison Mankin
New text was sent by SMB 9/23, which I sent to the
chairs, for them to send to the WG.

SMB:
I've reread it.  The …
New text was sent by SMB 9/23, which I sent to the
chairs, for them to send to the WG.

SMB:
I've reread it.  The Security Considerations section should include something like the following:

--

Information about the capabilities of a CAR often needs to be digitally signed.  Otherwise, intentional or accidental APs can capture traffic, to the detriment of the MN.  Such captures can result in black holes, and/or can facilitate eavesdropping and active attacks.  (Attacks like these have already occurred on 802.11 networks.)

The need for digital signatures can cause other problems.  MNs MUST be preprovisioned with information that lets them ascertain the authorization of any CAR.  Digital signatures are expensive to compute
and verify; this can translate into increased computational load on the CARs and on the MNs, and increased power consumption on the MNs.
2002-09-26
04 Allison Mankin A new comment added
by mankin
2002-09-13
04 Stephen Coya State Changes to Reading List from New Version Needed (WG/Author) by scoya
2002-06-11
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-seamoby-cardiscovery-issues-03.txt
2002-04-10
04 Allison Mankin
State Changes to New Version Needed (WG/Author)                    from Expert Review              …
State Changes to New Version Needed (WG/Author)                    from Expert Review                                    by Allison Mankin
2002-04-02
04 Allison Mankin Sent comments to authors/WG - revision expected
2002-04-02
04 Allison Mankin
State Changes to Request Rejected                                  from Requested      …
State Changes to Request Rejected                                  from Requested                                        by Allison Mankin
2002-04-02
04 Allison Mankin Intended Status has been changed to Informational from Request
2002-01-17
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-seamoby-cardiscovery-issues-02.txt
2001-09-18
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-seamoby-cardiscovery-issues-01.txt
2001-07-13
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-seamoby-cardiscovery-issues-00.txt