The Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Ghostbusters Record
draft-ietf-sidr-ghostbusters-16
Yes
(Ron Bonica)
(Sean Turner)
(Stewart Bryant)
No Objection
(David Harrington)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Robert Sparks)
(Wesley Eddy)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 16 and is now closed.
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2011-10-16)
Unknown
As you will be aware (having read RFC 5513) it is hard to find a previously unused three letter combination. I don't think there are any issues with using the .gbr filename extension, but be aware that it is also used by gimp graphics package.
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2011-10-20)
Unknown
This document could only have been written by Randy :-)
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
David Harrington Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-10-09)
Unknown
I was left a bit confused about what precisely is *the* Ghostbusters Record. I got lost as to what was the record, and what was the payload of the record. It would have helped me if in addition to, "The Ghostbusters Record conforms to the syntax defined in [I-D.ietf-sidr-signed-object]", you would have added the sentence "The payload of this signed object is a severely profiled vcard", and maybe having something in the "Additional Information" in the media type registration that it is the SIDR signed-object, not the vcard data, that is being defined as the media type. Maybe folks who work in this space would not have gotten confused, but as random MIME schmo, it took me going back and forth a few times to be clear on what was what.
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-10-17)
Unknown
Please consider the comments from the Gen-ART Review from Miguel Garcia on 19-Sep-2011. The review can be found here: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg06741.html
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-10-11)
Unknown
Is it considered acceptable to not put a person's name in the FN field of the record but rather a role, e.g. "shit/fan separator" or the polite equivalent? If that's considered ok, maybe pointing it out would be good. If not, then perhaps emphasise that the FN must be the name of a real person but then I wonder how this is maintained when the current shit/fan separator goes on vacation or gets fired.
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown