The Common Log Format (CLF) for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP): Framework and Information Model
draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-13

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2016-11-30 13 (System) Closed request for Last Call review by GENART with state 'Unknown'
2015-10-14 13 (System) Notify list changed from sipclf-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement@ietf.org to (None)
2013-02-14 13 (System) RFC published
2013-02-12 13 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48
2013-01-11 13 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC
2013-01-10 13 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2013-01-09 13 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent
2013-01-09 13 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2013-01-09 13 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2013-01-09 13 Amy Vezza Ballot approval text was generated
2013-01-09 13 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2013-01-09 13 Ralph Droms [Ballot comment]
I've cleared my DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.  Thanks
for addressing the issues I raised.
2013-01-09 13 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ralph Droms has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2013-01-03 13 Benoit Claise [Ballot Position Update] Position for Benoit Claise has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2013-01-03 13 Vijay Gurbani New version available: draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-13.txt
2012-12-27 12 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-12-24 12 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2012-12-24 12 Vijay Gurbani New version available: draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-12.txt
2012-12-20 11 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
This is a nicely written, easy to understand document.  Thank you.

I'd like to discuss some minor clarifications that I think ...
2012-12-20 11 Ralph Droms Ballot discuss text updated for Ralph Droms
2012-12-20 11 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation
2012-12-20 11 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo
2012-12-20 11 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
This is a nicely written, easy to understand document.  Thank you.

I'd like to discuss some minor clarifications that I think ...
2012-12-20 11 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
1. Why is the list of fields defined in section 8.1 repeated in
section 8.2?  Seems like an opportunity for ...
2012-12-20 11 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Ralph Droms
2012-12-19 11 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Wesley Eddy
2012-12-19 11 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2012-12-19 11 Benoit Claise
[Ballot discuss]
-
  "In addition, it provides a data model pertaining to the minimum
  set of SIP headers and fields that must be logged ...
2012-12-19 11 Benoit Claise
[Ballot comment]
I'm available if you need to discuss those comments.

- The field semantic is not clear, at least to me as an non ...
2012-12-19 11 Benoit Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2012-12-18 11 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2012-12-18 11 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ronald Bonica
2012-12-18 11 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
Section 8:

  Some of these fields contain URIs [RFC3986].  If the URI
  contains an escaped character (""%" HEX HEX" mechanism), the ...
2012-12-18 11 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2012-12-18 11 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2012-12-18 11 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2012-12-17 11 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2012-12-17 11 Sean Turner [Ballot comment]
I support Stephen's discuss.
2012-12-17 11 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sean Turner
2012-12-17 11 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley
2012-12-17 11 Robert Sparks State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2012-12-17 11 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]

section 10: You say that some fields SHOULD be anonymized or
obfuscated, which is ok for this draft, but the recipient of
such ...
2012-12-17 11 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

- expand CDR on 1st use

- section 8, '(""%" HEX HEX" mechanism)' isn't very clear,
maybe better to just say "%-escaped" and add some ...
2012-12-17 11 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2012-12-17 11 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call
2012-12-12 11 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Robert Sparks
2012-12-12 11 Robert Sparks Placed on agenda for telechat - 2012-12-20
2012-12-11 11 Pearl Liang
IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-11, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments:

IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there are ...
2012-12-06 11 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Joel Halpern
2012-12-03 11 Amy Vezza
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: < ...
2012-12-03 11 Amy Vezza State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2012-12-03 11 Robert Sparks Please see the updated shepherd writeup at <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/sipclf/management/shepherds/draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement/writeup/>
2012-12-03 11 Robert Sparks Last call was requested
2012-12-03 11 Robert Sparks Ballot approval text was generated
2012-12-03 11 Robert Sparks State changed to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested
2012-12-03 11 Robert Sparks Last call announcement was changed
2012-12-03 11 Robert Sparks Last call announcement was generated
2012-12-03 11 Robert Sparks Intended Status changed to Proposed Standard from Informational
2012-12-03 11 Robert Sparks Last call announcement was changed
2012-12-03 11 Robert Sparks Last call announcement was generated
2012-12-03 11 Robert Sparks Annotation tag Doc Shepherd Follow-up Underway cleared.
2012-12-03 11 Robert Sparks Changed protocol writeup
2012-12-03 11 Robert Sparks Ballot writeup was changed
2012-12-03 11 Robert Sparks Ballot writeup was changed
2012-11-30 11 Amy Vezza
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard, Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why is this the proper type of RFC ...
2012-11-30 11 Amy Vezza State changed to Publication Requested from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2012-11-30 11 Ryan Cross Created "Approve" ballot
2012-11-30 11 Ryan Cross Closed "Approve" ballot
2012-08-22 11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Stewart Bryant
2012-08-22 11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Peter Saint-Andre
2012-08-22 11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Stephen Farrell
2012-03-29 11 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot comment]
I support Ralph's DISCUSS points.
2012-03-29 11 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2012-03-19 11 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
updated for -11-

I don't think my concerns have been addressed.

1) I agree with the other IESG members who think this ...
2012-03-19 11 David Harrington Ballot comment and discuss text updated for David Harrington
2012-03-09 11 Vijay Gurbani New version available: draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-11.txt
2012-02-13 10 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot comment]
Thank you for addressing my comments.
2012-02-13 10 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] Position for Peter Saint-Andre has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-02-09 10 David Harrington [Ballot comment]
2012-02-09 10 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
updated for -10-

I don't think my concerns have been addressed.

1) I agree with the other IESG members who think this ...
2012-02-06 10 Stephen Farrell [Ballot comment]
2012-02-06 10 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-02-06 10 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2012-02-06 10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-10.txt
2012-01-12 10 Stewart Bryant [Ballot comment]
Thank you for clarifying the operation of the protocol. I am clearing my discuss.
2012-01-12 10 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stewart Bryant has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-01-05 10 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Richard Barnes.
2012-01-05 10 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2012-01-05 10 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation.
2012-01-05 10 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2012-01-05 10 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
I think we need a log file format. And it needs to work on application level, because, as noted, layer 3 or 4 ...
2012-01-05 10 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2012-01-04 10 Wesley Eddy [Ballot comment]
I support Stephen & Ralph's DISCUSS points
2012-01-04 10 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2012-01-04 10 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot comment]
The document states that the Wireshark format cannot be used because "if the SIP messages are exchanged over a TLS-oriented transport, Wireshark will ...
2012-01-04 10 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot discuss]
I'd like to chat about internationalization. Section 8 mentions draft-ietf-sipclf-format as an example of a representation format that provides an ASCII-based encoding ...
2012-01-04 10 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2012-01-04 10 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
Seems like others have the DISCUSS points well in hand.

It seems a bit goofy in section 8.1 to call out fields ...
2012-01-04 10 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2012-01-04 10 David Harrington
[Ballot comment]
1) section 6 strikes me as marketing claims for the wonderful things that a sipclf can provide. But these tools are not part ...
2012-01-04 10 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
1) I agree with the other IESG members who think this exceeds the scope of a problem statement.

2) I agree with the ...
2012-01-04 10 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2012-01-04 10 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
In the 'Operational guidance' section:

> SIP CLF log files will take up substantive amount of disk space
  depending on traffic volume ...
2012-01-04 10 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded
2012-01-03 10 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
Editorial observation: "CLF format" is redundant.

Process comment - the IESG Writeup Working Group Summary consists of
one sentence: "The problem statement was not ...
2012-01-03 10 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
The exact purpose and intended use of this document is not clear to
me.  The document name include "problem-statement," the title includes ...
2012-01-03 10 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2012-01-03 10 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot discuss]
I would like to discuss with the authors whether the data model is an example or is definitive? If it is definitive why ...
2012-01-03 10 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2012-01-02 10 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded
2012-01-02 10 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
Although this document does not define a CLF for SIP, I am not clear why
the data model here is not normative as ...
2012-01-02 10 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-12-31 10 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-12-31 10 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
- What does "trace a call from one entity to another mean"?  I do
hope we're not proposing that lawful intercept is ...
2011-12-31 10 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
This seems like a lot more than a problem statement.  I'm not clear
whether the security and privacy considerations here will ...
2011-12-31 10 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-12-21 10 Gonzalo Camarillo State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2011-12-20 10 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2011-12-13 10 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Robert Sparks
2011-12-13 10 Robert Sparks Ballot has been issued
2011-12-13 10 Robert Sparks Created "Approve" ballot
2011-12-13 10 Robert Sparks Placed on agenda for telechat - 2012-01-05
2011-12-12 10 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Richard Barnes
2011-12-09 10 Amanda Baber We understand that this document doesn't require any IANA actions.
2011-12-08 10 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Joel Halpern
2011-12-06 10 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2011-12-06 10 Amy Vezza
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org ...
2011-12-06 10 Robert Sparks Last Call was requested
2011-12-06 10 Robert Sparks State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup.
2011-12-06 10 Robert Sparks Last Call text changed
2011-12-06 10 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2011-12-06 10 (System) Last call text was added
2011-12-06 10 Robert Sparks Ballot writeup text changed
2011-12-06 10 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-12-06 09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-09.txt
2011-12-01 10 Robert Sparks State changed to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation::AD Followup.
Minor revision needed to update the title of the draft
2011-11-14 10 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-11-14 08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-08.txt
2011-08-05 10 Robert Sparks State changed to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation.
2011-08-05 10 Robert Sparks State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested.
2011-07-15 10 Cindy Morgan
(1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the
document and, in particular, does ...
2011-07-15 10 Cindy Morgan Draft added in state Publication Requested
2011-07-15 10 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'Peter Musgrave (musgravepj@gmail.com) is the document shepherd.' added
2011-07-14 10 Peter Musgrave Changed protocol writeup
2011-07-14 10 Peter Musgrave Submitted for AD review
2011-07-14 10 Peter Musgrave Annotation tag Doc Shepherd Follow-up Underway set.
2011-07-14 10 Peter Musgrave Concluded WGLC. Ready for AD review....
2011-07-14 10 Peter Musgrave IETF state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from WG Document
2011-06-06 07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-07.txt
2011-04-18 06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-06.txt
2011-03-11 05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-05.txt
2010-10-25 04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-04.txt
2010-06-29 03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-03.txt
2010-06-08 02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-02.txt
2010-03-08 01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-01.txt
2010-02-08 00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-00.txt