Use of the SEED Encryption Algorithm in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
draft-ietf-smime-cms-seed-02
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2012-08-22
|
02 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Yes position for Russ Housley |
2004-09-27
|
02 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza |
2004-09-24
|
02 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
2004-09-24
|
02 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2004-09-24
|
02 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2004-09-23
|
02 | Russ Housley | Suggestion to the RFC Editor: draft-park-seed-01.txt is in IESG evaluation, and it makes sence to publish that document at the same time with an adjacent … Suggestion to the RFC Editor: draft-park-seed-01.txt is in IESG evaluation, and it makes sence to publish that document at the same time with an adjacent number. |
2004-08-30
|
02 | Russ Housley | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Russ Housley |
2004-08-30
|
02 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to Yes from Discuss by Russ Housley |
2004-08-30
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-smime-cms-seed-02.txt |
2004-08-20
|
02 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-08-19 |
2004-08-19
|
02 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza |
2004-08-19
|
02 | Russ Housley | [Ballot discuss] Given that this document specifies the use of the SEED algorithm for various operations, a normative reference to a specification of SEED is … [Ballot discuss] Given that this document specifies the use of the SEED algorithm for various operations, a normative reference to a specification of SEED is needed. |
2004-08-19
|
02 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to Discuss from Yes by Russ Housley |
2004-08-19
|
02 | Thomas Narten | [Ballot comment] > SEED is easily implemented in various software and hardware because > it is designed to increase the efficiency of memory … [Ballot comment] > SEED is easily implemented in various software and hardware because > it is designed to increase the efficiency of memory storage and the > simplicity in generating keys without degrading the security of the > algorithm. Not sure what "increase the efficiency of memory storage" is supposed to mean. Later, I assume it is meant "takes less memory to implement than other algorithms". Might be good to just say that. > Especially, it has been evaluated and also considered > cryptographically secure by trustworhty organizations such as ISO/IEC > JTC 1/SC 27 and Japan CRYTEC (Cryptography Reasearch and Evaluation > Comittees) [ISOSEED][CRYPTEC]. s/trustworthy// ? "trustworthy" is a value judgement; not clear this sort of document should be using such words for describing organizations. |
2004-08-19
|
02 | Thomas Narten | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Thomas Narten by Thomas Narten |
2004-08-19
|
02 | David Kessens | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens |
2004-08-19
|
02 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen |
2004-08-19
|
02 | Allison Mankin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin |
2004-08-19
|
02 | Harald Alvestrand | [Ballot comment] Reviewed by Mary Barnes, Gen-ART Abstract seems overly terse. |
2004-08-19
|
02 | Harald Alvestrand | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Harald Alvestrand by Harald Alvestrand |
2004-08-18
|
02 | Margaret Cullen | [Ballot comment] CMS (and SEED?) should be expanded in the title. The requirement level for this support is unclear. The introduction indicates that this is … [Ballot comment] CMS (and SEED?) should be expanded in the title. The requirement level for this support is unclear. The introduction indicates that this is an optional algorithm, but later the document says: If users require SEED for symmetric encryption, it MUST be supported by the S/MIME clients on both the sending and receiving side, and it MUST be set in the user preferences. I don't think that this "MUST" should be uppercase. I understand that both sides would need to support the algorithm in order for it to work, but I believe that implementation is optional. Right? |
2004-08-18
|
02 | Margaret Cullen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman |
2004-08-18
|
02 | Bill Fenner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner |
2004-08-16
|
02 | Jon Peterson | [Ballot comment] Given that this document specifies the use of the SEED algorithm for various operations, it seems a little odd that there is no … [Ballot comment] Given that this document specifies the use of the SEED algorithm for various operations, it seems a little odd that there is no normative reference to a specification of SEED. It also appears that draft-park-seed has expired. |
2004-08-16
|
02 | Jon Peterson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson |
2004-08-16
|
02 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie |
2004-08-14
|
02 | Steven Bellovin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Steve Bellovin by Steve Bellovin |
2004-07-19
|
02 | Scott Hollenbeck | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck |
2004-07-18
|
02 | Russ Housley | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Russ Housley |
2004-07-18
|
02 | Russ Housley | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-08-19 by Russ Housley |
2004-07-18
|
02 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Russ Housley |
2004-07-18
|
02 | Russ Housley | Ballot has been issued by Russ Housley |
2004-07-18
|
02 | Russ Housley | Created "Approve" ballot |
2004-07-16
|
02 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system |
2004-07-08
|
02 | Michelle Cotton | IANA Last Call Comments: We understand this document to have NO IANA Actions. |
2004-06-23
|
02 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
2004-06-23
|
02 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
2004-06-23
|
02 | Russ Housley | Last Call was requested by Russ Housley |
2004-06-23
|
02 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
2004-06-23
|
02 | (System) | Last call text was added |
2004-06-23
|
02 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
2004-06-23
|
02 | Russ Housley | State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Russ Housley |
2004-06-23
|
02 | Russ Housley | State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Russ Housley |
2004-04-23
|
02 | Russ Housley | Draft Added by Russ Housley |
2004-04-21
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-smime-cms-seed-01.txt |
2004-04-05
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-smime-cms-seed-00.txt |