Skip to main content

Use of the SEED Encryption Algorithm in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
draft-ietf-smime-cms-seed-02

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2012-08-22
02 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Yes position for Russ Housley
2004-09-27
02 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2004-09-24
02 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2004-09-24
02 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2004-09-24
02 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2004-09-23
02 Russ Housley
Suggestion to the RFC Editor: draft-park-seed-01.txt is in IESG evaluation, and it makes sence to publish that document at the same time with an adjacent …
Suggestion to the RFC Editor: draft-park-seed-01.txt is in IESG evaluation, and it makes sence to publish that document at the same time with an adjacent number.
2004-08-30
02 Russ Housley State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Russ Housley
2004-08-30
02 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to Yes from Discuss by Russ Housley
2004-08-30
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-smime-cms-seed-02.txt
2004-08-20
02 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-08-19
2004-08-19
02 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2004-08-19
02 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
Given that this document specifies the use of the SEED algorithm for various operations, a normative reference to a specification of SEED is …
[Ballot discuss]
Given that this document specifies the use of the SEED algorithm for various operations, a normative reference to a specification of SEED is needed.
2004-08-19
02 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to Discuss from Yes by Russ Housley
2004-08-19
02 Thomas Narten
[Ballot comment]
>    SEED is easily implemented in various software and hardware because
>    it is designed to increase the efficiency of memory …
[Ballot comment]
>    SEED is easily implemented in various software and hardware because
>    it is designed to increase the efficiency of memory storage and the
>    simplicity in generating keys without degrading the security of the
>    algorithm.

Not sure what "increase the efficiency of memory storage" is supposed
to mean. Later, I assume it is meant "takes less memory to implement
than other algorithms". Might be good to just say that.

>    Especially, it has been evaluated and also considered
>    cryptographically secure by trustworhty organizations such as ISO/IEC
>    JTC 1/SC 27 and Japan CRYTEC (Cryptography Reasearch and Evaluation
>    Comittees) [ISOSEED][CRYPTEC].

s/trustworthy// ? "trustworthy" is a value judgement; not clear this
sort of document should be using such words for describing organizations.
2004-08-19
02 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Thomas Narten by Thomas Narten
2004-08-19
02 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2004-08-19
02 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen
2004-08-19
02 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin
2004-08-19
02 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot comment]
Reviewed by Mary Barnes, Gen-ART
Abstract seems overly terse.
2004-08-19
02 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Harald Alvestrand by Harald Alvestrand
2004-08-18
02 Margaret Cullen
[Ballot comment]
CMS (and SEED?) should be expanded in the title.

The requirement level for this support is unclear.  The introduction indicates that this is …
[Ballot comment]
CMS (and SEED?) should be expanded in the title.

The requirement level for this support is unclear.  The introduction indicates that this is an optional algorithm, but later the document says:

  If users require SEED for symmetric
  encryption, it MUST be supported by the S/MIME clients on both the
  sending and receiving side, and it MUST be set in the user
  preferences.

I don't think that this "MUST" should be uppercase.  I understand that both sides would need to support the algorithm in order for it to work, but I believe that implementation is optional.  Right?
2004-08-18
02 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman
2004-08-18
02 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner
2004-08-16
02 Jon Peterson
[Ballot comment]
Given that this document specifies the use of the SEED algorithm for various operations, it seems a little odd that there is no …
[Ballot comment]
Given that this document specifies the use of the SEED algorithm for various operations, it seems a little odd that there is no normative reference to a specification of SEED. It also appears that draft-park-seed has expired.
2004-08-16
02 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson
2004-08-16
02 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie
2004-08-14
02 Steven Bellovin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Steve Bellovin by Steve Bellovin
2004-07-19
02 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-07-18
02 Russ Housley State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Russ Housley
2004-07-18
02 Russ Housley Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-08-19 by Russ Housley
2004-07-18
02 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Russ Housley
2004-07-18
02 Russ Housley Ballot has been issued by Russ Housley
2004-07-18
02 Russ Housley Created "Approve" ballot
2004-07-16
02 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2004-07-08
02 Michelle Cotton IANA Last Call Comments:
We understand this document to have NO IANA Actions.
2004-06-23
02 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2004-06-23
02 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2004-06-23
02 Russ Housley Last Call was requested by Russ Housley
2004-06-23
02 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2004-06-23
02 (System) Last call text was added
2004-06-23
02 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2004-06-23
02 Russ Housley State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Russ Housley
2004-06-23
02 Russ Housley State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Russ Housley
2004-04-23
02 Russ Housley Draft Added by Russ Housley
2004-04-21
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-smime-cms-seed-01.txt
2004-04-05
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-smime-cms-seed-00.txt