Gateway-Initiated Dual-Stack Lite Deployment
draft-ietf-softwire-gateway-init-ds-lite-08
Yes
(Ralph Droms)
No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Stewart Bryant)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-04-08 for -06)
Unknown
I have no objection to the publication of this document, but I note that the Security Considerations section is flimsy. Surely there are security issues with how the mapping table at the AFTR is built. Although that is a "local matter" inplementers and deployers need to be aware that this feature must be secured.
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-04-11 for -06)
Unknown
I second Stephen's DISCUSS and Pete's comment.
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-04-04 for -06)
Unknown
Section 6 lists a set of abbreviations to describe the type of IPv4 addresses being used in a deployment. I understand all the possibilities, except for "nm" (described as non-meaningful/dummy). This that just a diplomatic way of describing a network deployment that is squatting on someone's public IPv4 address space?
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -06)
Unknown
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-04-07 for -06)
Unknown
There is only one use of 2119 language, and I'm not convinced it's necessary: o The softwire between the Gateway and the AFTR MAY be created at system startup time OR dynamically established on-demand. Is this a protocol option that one or both sides needs to be aware of? That is, does the Gateway or the AFTR need to prepare itself for on-demand establishment, or to be prepared that on-demand might not be available? I suspect you can change it to "may" or "can" and delete the reference to 2119.
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -06)
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -06)
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-04-12 for -06)
Unknown
I support Stephen's discuss.
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-05-01)
Unknown
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -06)
Unknown
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-04-11 for -06)
Unknown
Support Stephen's DISCUSS