Softwires Working Group M. Boucadair, Ed.
Internet-Draft France Telecom
Intended status: Informational S. Matsushima
Expires: May 17, 2013 Softbank Telecom
Y. Lee
Comcast
O. Bonness
Deutsche Telekom
I. Borges
Portugal Telecom
G. Chen
China Mobile
November 13, 2012
Motivations for Carrier-side Stateless IPv4 over IPv6 Migration
Solutions
draft-ietf-softwire-stateless-4v6-motivation-05
Abstract
IPv4 service continuity is one of the most pressing problems that
must be resolved by Service Providers during the IPv6 transition
period - especially after the exhaustion of the public IPv4 address
space. Current standardization effort that addresses IPv4 service
continuity focuses on stateful mechanisms. This document elaborates
on the motivations for the need to undertake a companion effort to
specify stateless IPv4 over IPv6 approaches.
Status of this Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on May 17, 2013.
Copyright NoticeBoucadair, et al. Expires May 17, 2013 [Page 1]Internet-Draft Solution Motivations November 2012
Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Why Stateless IPv4 over IPv6 Solutions are Needed? . . . . . . 4
3.1. Network Architecture Simplification . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.1.1. Network Dimensioning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.1.2. No Intra-domain Constraint . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.1.3. Logging - No Need for Dynamic Binding Notifications . 5
3.1.4. No Additional Protocol for Port Control is Required . 5
3.2. Operational Tasks and Network Maintenance Efficiency . . . 6
3.2.1. Preserve Current Practices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.2.2. Planned Maintenance Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.2.3. Reliability and Robustness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.2.4. Support of Multi-Vendor Redundancy . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.2.5. Simplification of Qualification Procedures . . . . . . 7
3.3. Facilitating Service Evolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.3.1. Implicit Host Identification . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.3.2. No Organizational Impact . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.4. Cost Minimization Opportunities . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
4. Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4.1. Dependency Between IPv4 and IPv6 Address Assignments . . . 10
4.2. IPv4 Port Utilisation Efficiency . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
4.3. IPv4 Port Randomization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
5. Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
datatracker.ietf.org