CUBIC for Fast and Long-Distance Networks
draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis-15
Yes
(Martin Duke)
No Objection
(Alvaro Retana)
Recuse
(Lars Eggert)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 14 and is now closed.
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
Yes
Comment
(2023-01-18 for -14)
Not sent
Thanks for working on this due specification.
Erik Kline
No Objection
Comment
(2023-01-08 for -14)
Not sent
# Internet AD comments for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis-14 CC @ekline ## Nits ### S4.4, S4.5 * The text file version seems to have rendered the "cwnd" in the demoninator as "culvert", which was pretty confusing. :-) ### S5.1 * "networks with a short RTTs" -> "networks with short RTTs", probably
Francesca Palombini
No Objection
Comment
(2023-01-18 for -14)
Not sent
Thank you for the work on this document. Many thanks to Spencer Dawkins for his ART ART review: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/_BMAGlC1TXKYcLy0HC1yF6ZR11M/ , and to the author for addressing Spencer's comments.
John Scudder
No Objection
Comment
(2023-01-18 for -14)
Sent
Thanks to Yoshifumi Nishida for the outstanding shepherd writeup, in particular the section on WG consensus.
Paul Wouters
No Objection
Comment
(2023-01-18 for -14)
Not sent
It's nice to see such expressive math in an RFC (even if I don't comprehend most of it, I'm sure the target audience appreciates it too)
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Comment
(2023-01-12 for -14)
Not sent
Thank you to Yoav Nir for the SECDIR review.
Warren Kumari
No Objection
Comment
(2023-01-19 for -14)
Sent
After reading the ballots, I went to go see what all the fuss is about with the Shepherd Writeup -- and fully support everyone's comments; it was nicely detailed and helpful. I'd also like to thank Bo Wu for the OpsDir writeup, and also, of course, the authors for writing this. I didn't understand much of the deep details / math, but it sounded plausible and used many big words, so... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Martin Duke Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -14)
Unknown
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -14)
Not sent
Andrew Alston Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2023-01-19 for -14)
Sent
Thanks for the solid work on this document and also wanted to say, thanks for the great shepherd writeup that was detailed clear and concise.
Robert Wilton Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2023-01-13 for -14)
Not sent
Thank you to Bo Wu for the OPSDIR review.
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
Recuse
Recuse
(for -14)
Not sent