SF Aware TE Topology YANG Model
draft-ietf-teas-sf-aware-topo-model-09
| Document | Type | Active Internet-Draft (teas WG) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Igor Bryskin , Xufeng Liu , Young Lee , Jim Guichard , Luis M. Contreras , Daniele Ceccarelli , Jeff Tantsura , Dmytro Shytyi | ||
| Last updated | 2022-02-27 | ||
| Replaces | draft-bryskin-teas-sf-aware-topo-model | ||
| Stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | plain text pdf htmlized pdfized bibtex | ||
| Yang Validation | 0 errors, 0 warnings | ||
| Reviews |
YANGDOCTORS Early review
(of
-08)
Ready with Issues
|
||
| Additional resources |
Yang catalog entry for ietf-te-topology-sf-state@2019-11-03.yang
Yang catalog entry for ietf-te-topology-sf@2019-11-03.yang Yang impact analysis for draft-ietf-teas-sf-aware-topo-model Mailing list discussion |
||
| Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-ietf-teas-sf-aware-topo-model-09
Network Working Group I. Bryskin
Internet-Draft Individual
Intended status: Informational X. Liu
Expires: August 31, 2022 IBM Corporation
Y. Lee
Samsung Electronics
J. Guichard
Huawei Technologies
L. Contreras
Telefonica
D. Ceccarelli
Ericsson
J. Tantsura
Apstra Networks
D. Shytyi
SFR
February 27, 2022
SF Aware TE Topology YANG Model
draft-ietf-teas-sf-aware-topo-model-09
Abstract
This document describes a YANG data model for TE network topologies
that are network service and function aware.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on August 31, 2022.
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.2. Tree Diagrams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.3. Prefixes in Data Node Names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2. Modeling Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3. SF Aware TE Topology Model Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4. SF Aware TE Topology YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
7. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
7.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
7.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Appendix A. Companion YANG Model for Non-NMDA Compliant
Implementations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
A.1. SF Aware TE Topology State Module . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Appendix B. Data Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
B.1. A Topology with Multiple Connected Network Functions . . 29
B.2. A Topology with an Encapsulated Network Service . . . . . 34
Appendix C. Use Cases for SF Aware Topology Models . . . . . . . 38
C.1. Exporting SF/NF Information to Network Clients and Other
Network SDN Controllers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
C.2. Flat End-to-end SFCs Managed on Multi-domain Networks . 39
C.3. Managing SFCs with TE Constraints . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
C.4. SFC Protection and Load Balancing . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
C.5. Network Clock Synchronization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
C.6. Client - Provider Network Slicing Interface . . . . . . . 44
C.7. Dynamic Assignment of Regenerators for L0 Services . . . 44
C.8. Dynamic Assignment of OAM Functions for L1 Services . . . 46
C.9. SFC Abstraction and Scaling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
C.10. Dynamic Compute/VM/Storage Resource Assignment . . . . . 47
C.11. Application-aware Resource Operations and Management . . 48
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
C.12. Interconnection between Service Functions/Termination
Points in uCPE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
1. Introduction
RFC Ed.: In this document, please replace all occurrences of 'XXXX'
with the actual RFC number (and remove this note).
Normally network connectivity services are discussed as a means to
inter-connect various abstract or physical network topological
elements, such as ports, link termination points and nodes [RFC8795]
[I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te]. However, the connectivity services,
strictly speaking, interconnect not the network topology elements
per-se, rather, located on/associated with the various network and
service functions [RFC7498] [RFC7665]. In many scenarios it is
beneficial to decouple the service/network functions from the network
topology elements hosting them, describe them in some unambiguous and
identifiable way (so that it would be possible, for example, to auto-
discover on the network topology service/network functions with
identical or similar functionality and characteristics) and engineer
the connectivity between the service/network functions, rather than
between their current topological locations.
Today a network offers to its clients far more services than just
connectivity across the network. Large variety of physical, logical
and/or virtual service functions, network functions and transport
functions (collectively named in this document as SFs) could be
allocated for and assigned to a client. As described in the appendix
of this document, there are some important use cases, in which the
network needs to represent to the client SFs at the client's disposal
as topological elements in relation to other elements of a topology
(i.e. nodes, links, link and tunnel termination points) used by the
network to describe itself to the client. Not only would such
information allow for the client to auto-discover the network's SFs
available for the services provisioned for the client, it would also
allow for the client selecting the SFs, duel-optimizing the selection
on the SF location on the network and connectivity means (e.g. TE
tunnels) to inter-connect the SFs. Consequently thus would give to
both the network and the client powerful means for the service
function chain (SFC [RFC7498] [RFC7665]) negotiation to achieve most
efficient and cost effective (from the network point of view) and
most optimal yet satisfying all necessary constraints of SFCs (from
the client's point of view).
This document defines a YANG [RFC7950] data model that allows service
functions to be represented along with TE topology elements.
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
The YANG data model in this document conforms to the Network
Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA) [RFC8342].
1.1. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
14, [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
o Network Function (NF): A functional block within a network
infrastructure that has well-defined external interfaces and well-
defined functional behaviour [ETSI-NFV-TERM]. Such functions
include message router, CDN, session border controller, WAN
cceleration, DPI, firewall, NAT, QoE monitor, PE router, BRAS, and
radio/fixed access network nodes.
o Network Service: Composition of Network Function(s) and/or Network
Service(s), defined by its functional and behavioural
specification. The Network Service contributes to the behaviour
of the higher layer service, which is characterized by at least
performance, dependability, and security specifications. The end-
to-end network service behaviour is the result of the combination
of the individual network function behaviours as well as the
behaviours of the network infrastructure composition mechanism
[ETSI-NFV-TERM].
o Service Function (SF): A function that is responsible for specific
treatment of received packets. A service function can act at
various layers of a protocol stack (e.g., at the network layer or
other OSI layers). As a logical component, a service function can
be realized as a virtual element or be embedded in a physical
network element. One or more service functions can be embedded in
the same network element. Multiple occurrences of the service
function can exist in the same administrative domain. A non-
exhaustive list of service functions includes: firewalls, WAN and
application acceleration, Deep Packet Inspection (DPI), server
load balancers, NAT44 [RFC3022], NAT64 [RFC6146], HTTP header
enrichment functions, and TCP optimizers. The generic term "L4-L7
services" is often used to describe many service functions
[RFC7498].
o Service Function Chain (SFC): A service function chain defines an
ordered or partially ordered set of abstract service functions and
ordering constraints that must be applied to packets, frames, and/
or flows selected as a result of classification. An example of an
abstract service function is a firewall. The implied order may
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
not be a linear progression as the architecture allows for SFCs
that copy to more than one branch, and also allows for cases where
there is flexibility in the order in which service functions need
to be applied. The term "service chain" is often used as
shorthand for "service function chain" [RFC7498].
o Connectivity Service: Any service between layer 0 and layer 3
aiming at delivering traffic among two or more end customer edge
nodes connected to provider edge nodes. Examples include L3VPN,
L2VPN etc.
o Link Termination Point (LTP): A conceptual point of connection of
a TE node to one of the TE links, terminated by the TE node.
Cardinality between an LTP and the associated TE link is 1:0..1
[RFC8795].
o Tunnel Termination Point (TTP): An element of TE topology
representing one or several of potential transport service
termination points (i.e. service client adaptation points such as
WDM/OCh transponder). TTP is associated with (hosted by) exactly
one TE node. TTP is assigned with the TE node scope unique ID.
Depending on the TE node's internal constraints, a given TTP
hosted by the TE node could be accessed via one, several or all TE
links terminated by the TE node [RFC8795].
o Topology and Orchestration Specification for Cloud Applications
(TOSCA): A language standard specified by OASIS, to describe
service components and their relationships using a service
topology, and management procedures using orchestration processes.
OASIS is a nonprofit consortium that drives the development,
convergence and adoption of open standards for the global
information society.
The following terms are defined in [RFC7950] and are not redefined
here:
o augment
o data model
o data node
1.2. Tree Diagrams
A simplified graphical representation of the data model is presented
in this document, by using the tree format defined in [RFC8340].
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
1.3. Prefixes in Data Node Names
In this document, names of data nodes, actions, and other data model
objects are often used without a prefix, as long as it is clear from
the context in which YANG module each name is defined. Otherwise,
names are prefixed using the standard prefix associated with the
corresponding YANG module, as shown in Table 1.
+----------+------------------+------------------------------+
| Prefix | YANG module | Reference |
+----------+------------------+------------------------------+
| inet | ietf-inet-types | [RFC6991] |
| nw | ietf-network | [RFC8345] |
| nt | ietf-network- | [RFC8345] |
| | topology | |
| te-types | ietf-te-types | [RFC8776] |
| tet | ietf-te-topology | [RFC8795] |
| actn-vn | ietf-actn-vn | [I-D.ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang] |
+----------+------------------+------------------------------+
Table 1: Prefixes and Corresponding YANG Modules
2. Modeling Considerations
The model introduced in this document is an augmentation of the TE
Topology model defined in [RFC8795]. SFs are modeled as child
elements of a TE node similarly to how Link Termination Points (LTPs)
and Tunnel Termination Points (TTPs) are modeled in the TE Topology
model. The SFs are defined as opaque objects identified via topology
unique service-function-id's. Each SF has one or more Connection
Points (CPs) identified via SF-unique sf-connection-point-id's, over
which the SF could be connected to other SFs resided on the same TE
node, as well as to other elements of the TE node, in particular, to
the node's LTPs and/or TTPs. An interested client may use service-
function-id's to look up the SFs in TOSCA or YANG data store(s)
defined by [ETSI-NFV-YANG] to retrieve the details of the SFs, for
example, to understand the SF's mutual substitutability.
The TE Topology model introduces a concept of Connectivity Matrix
(CM), and uses the CM to describe which and at what costs a TE node's
LTPs could be inter-connected internally across the TE node. The
model defined in this document heavily uses the same concept to
describe the SF connectivity via introducing 3 additional CMs:
1. SF2SF CM (SF to SF Connectivity Matrix). This CM describes which
pairs of SFs could be locally inter-connected, and, if yes, in
which direction, via which CPs and at what costs. In other
words, the SF2SF CM describes how SFs residing on the same TE
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
node could be inter-connected into local from the TE node's
perspective SFCs;
2. SF2LTP CM (SF to LTP Connectivity Matrix). This CM describes
how, in which direction and at what costs the TE node's SFs could
be connected to the TE node's LTPs and hence to SFs residing on
neighboring TE nodes that are connected to LTPs at the remote
ends of corresponding TE links;
3. SF2TTP CM (SF to TTP Connectivity Matrix). This CM describes
how, in which direction and at what costs the TE node's SFs could
be connected to the TE node's TTPs and hence to SFs residing on
other TE nodes on the topology that could be inter-connected with
the TE node in question via TE tunnels terminated by the
corresponding TTPs.
In addition to SF2SF CM, the local SF chaining could be described
with the help of ETSI models Virtual Links (VLs) [ETSI-NFV-YANG].
This option is especially useful when the costs of the local chaining
are negligible as compared to ones of the end-to-end SFCs said local
SFCs are part of.
Section 3 and 4 provide the YANG model structure and the YANG module
for SF-aware Topology. Section 5 and 6 provide the YANG model
structure and the YANG module for Data Center Compute Node resource
abstraction. This provides an example of SF2LTP CM where DC compute
nodes are connected to LTPs at the remote ends of the corresponding
TE links. This use-case is described in Section 10 of Appendix C.
3. SF Aware TE Topology Model Structure
module: ietf-te-topology-sf
augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:network-types/tet:te-topology:
+--rw sf!
augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/tet:te
/tet:te-node-attributes:
+--rw service-function
+--rw connectivity-matrices
| +--rw connectivity-matrix* [id]
| +--rw id uint32
| +--rw from
| | +--rw service-function-id? leafref
| | +--rw sf-connection-point-id? leafref
| +--rw to
| | +--rw service-function-id? leafref
| | +--rw sf-connection-point-id? leafref
| +--rw enabled? boolean
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
| +--rw direction? connectivity-direction
| +--rw virtual-link-id? string
+--rw link-terminations
+--rw link-termination* [id]
+--rw id uint32
+--rw from
| +--rw tp-ref? leafref
+--rw to
| +--rw service-function-id? leafref
| +--rw sf-connection-point-id? leafref
+--rw enabled? boolean
+--rw direction? connectivity-direction
augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/tet:te
/tet:information-source-entry:
+--ro service-function
+--ro connectivity-matrices
| +--ro connectivity-matrix* [id]
| +--ro id uint32
| +--ro from
| | +--ro service-function-id? leafref
| | +--ro sf-connection-point-id? leafref
| +--ro to
| | +--ro service-function-id? leafref
| | +--ro sf-connection-point-id? leafref
| +--ro enabled? boolean
| +--ro direction? connectivity-direction
| +--ro virtual-link-id? string
+--ro link-terminations
+--ro link-termination* [id]
+--ro id uint32
+--ro from
| +--ro tp-ref? leafref
+--ro to
| +--ro service-function-id? leafref
| +--ro sf-connection-point-id? leafref
+--ro enabled? boolean
+--ro direction? connectivity-direction
augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/tet:te
/tet:tunnel-termination-point:
+--rw service-function
+--rw tunnel-terminations
+--rw tunnel-termination* [id]
+--rw id uint32
+--rw service-function-id? leafref
+--rw sf-connection-point-id? leafref
+--rw enabled? boolean
+--rw direction? connectivity-direction
augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node:
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
+--rw service-functions
+--rw service-function* [id]
+--rw id string
+--rw type? identityref
+--rw te-metric? te-types:te-metric
+--rw priority? uint8
+--rw connection-points
+--rw connection-point* [id]
+--rw id string
+--rw type? identityref
4. SF Aware TE Topology YANG Module
This module references [RFC7665], [RFC8345], [RFC8776], [RFC8795],
[ETSI-NFV-YANG], and [ETSI-NFV-PACKAGE].
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-te-topology-sf@2022-02-25.yang"
module ietf-te-topology-sf {
yang-version 1.1;
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-te-topology-sf";
prefix "tet-sf";
import ietf-network {
prefix "nw";
reference
"RFC 8345: A YANG Data Model for Network Topologies";
}
import ietf-network-topology {
prefix "nt";
reference
"RFC 8345: A YANG Data Model for Network Topologies";
}
import ietf-te-topology {
prefix "tet";
reference
"RFC 8795: YANG Data Model for Traffic Engineering (TE)
Topologies";
}
import ietf-te-types {
prefix "te-types";
reference
"RFC8776: Common YANG Data Types for Traffic Engineering.";
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
}
organization
"Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling (TEAS)
Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/teas/>
WG List: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
Editors: Igor Bryskin
<mailto:Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com>
Xufeng Liu
<mailto:xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>";
description
"Network service and function aware aware TE topology model.
Copyright (c) 2021 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to
the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set
forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see the
RFC itself for full legal notices.";
revision 2022-02-25 {
description "Initial revision";
reference "RFC XXXX: SF Aware TE Topology YANG Model";
}
/*
* Identities
*/
identity sf-type {
description
"Base identity from which all service function types are
derived. The definitions of the derived identities are
left to the implementation. An example can be 'firewall'.";
}
identity cp-type {
description
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
"Base identity from which all connection point types are
derived. The definitions of the derived identities are
left to the implementation. Examples can be 'ethernet',
'mpls', or 'ipv4'.";
}
/*
* Typedefs
*/
typedef connectivity-direction {
type enumeration {
enum "to" {
description
"The direction is uni-directional, towards the 'to'
entity direction.";
}
enum "from" {
description
"The direction is uni-directional, from the 'to'
entity direction.";
}
enum "bidir" {
description
"The direction is bi-directional.";
}
}
description
"A type used to indicates whether a connectivity is
uni-directional, or bi-directional. If the relation is
uni-directional, the value of this type indicates the
direction.";
} // connectivity-direction
/*
* Groupings
*/
grouping service-function-connection-point-ref {
description
"Reference to a service function connection point.";
leaf service-function-id {
type leafref {
path "../../../../../../../service-functions/"
+ "service-function/id";
}
description
"Reference to a service function id.";
}
leaf sf-connection-point-id {
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
type leafref {
path "../../../../../../../service-functions/"
+ "service-function[id=current()/../service-function-id]/"
+ "connection-points/connection-point/id";
}
description
"Reference to a SF(service function) connection point id.";
}
} // service-function-connection-point-ref
grouping service-function-node-augmentation {
description
"Augmenting a node to contain a list of available service
functions.";
container service-functions {
description
"Containing the service functions that are available on this
node. Any of these service functions can be referenced
and enabled in te-node-attributes";
list service-function {
key "id";
description
"A list of service functions on this node.";
leaf id {
type string;
description "Identifies the service function.";
}
leaf type {
type identityref {
base "sf-type";
}
description
"The service function type, such as 'firewall'.
The parameters of each service function type are not
specified in this model, and may be speficied by other
models such as the one defined by ETSI GS NFV-IFA 011.";
reference
"ETSI-NFV-PACKAGE: ETSI GS NFV-IFA 011:
Network Functions Virtualisation (NFV) Release 4;
Management and Orchestration;
VNF Descriptor and Packaging Specification.";
}
leaf te-metric {
type te-types:te-metric;
description
"Specifies the TE (Traffic Engineering) metric for this
service function. The server uses this value as a
preference of selecting the given service function
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
instance.";
}
leaf priority {
type uint8;
default 0;
description
"Specifies the priority level at which the service
function instance is available.
A lower number indicates a higher priority. The highest
priority is 0.";
}
container connection-points {
description
"Containing the connection points that are available on
this service function.
node. Any of these connection points can be referenced
and enabled in te-node-attributes";
list connection-point {
key "id";
description
"A list of connection points on this node.";
leaf id {
type string;
description "Identifies the connection point.";
}
leaf type {
type identityref {
base "cp-type";
}
description
"The connection point type, such as 'ethernet',
'mpls', or 'ipv4'.
The parameters of each service function type are not
specified in this model, and may be speficied by
other models such as the one defined by ETSI GS
NFV-IFA 011.";
reference
"ETSI-NFV-PACKAGE: ETSI GS NFV-IFA 011:
Network Functions Virtualisation (NFV) Release 4;
Management and Orchestration;
VNF Descriptor and Packaging Specification.";
}
}
}
}
}
} // service-function-node-augmentation
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
grouping service-function-node-te-augmentation {
description
"Augmenting a TE node to be network service and function
aware.";
container service-function {
description
"Containing attributes related to network services and
network functions";
container connectivity-matrices {
description
"Connectivity relations between network services/functions
on a TE node, which can be either abstract or physical.";
reference
"ETSI-NFV-YANG: ETSI GS NFV-SOL 006:
Network Functions Virtualisation (NFV) Release 3;
Protocols and Data Models;
NFV descriptors based on YANG specification.
RFC7665: Service Function Chaining (SFC) Architecture.";
list connectivity-matrix {
key "id";
description
"Represents the connectivity relations between network
services/functions on a TE node.";
leaf id {
type uint32;
description "Identifies the connectivity-matrix entry.";
}
container from {
description
"Reference to the source network service or
network function.";
uses service-function-connection-point-ref;
} // from
container to {
description
"Reference to the destination network service or
network function.";
uses service-function-connection-point-ref;
} // to
leaf enabled {
type boolean;
description
"'true' if this connectivity entry is enabled.";
}
leaf direction {
type connectivity-direction;
description
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
"Indicates whether this connectivity is
uni-directional, or bi-directional. If the
relation is uni-directional, the value of
this leaf indicates the direction.";
}
leaf virtual-link-id {
type string;
description
"Reference to a virtual link that models this
conectivity relation in the network function
model.";
}
} // connectivity-matrix
} // connectivity-matrices
container link-terminations {
description
"Connectivity relations between network services/functions
and link termination points on a TE node, which can be
either abstract or physical.";
reference
"ETSI-NFV-YANG: ETSI GS NFV-SOL 006:
Network Functions Virtualisation (NFV) Release 3;
Protocols and Data Models;
NFV descriptors based on YANG specification.
RFC7665: Service Function Chaining (SFC) Architecture.";
list link-termination {
key "id";
description
"Each entry of the list represents the connectivity
relation between a network service/function and
a link termination point on a TE node.";
leaf id {
type uint32;
description "Identifies the termination entry.";
}
container from {
description
"Reference to the link termination point.";
} // from
container to {
description
"Reference to the network service or network
function.";
uses service-function-connection-point-ref;
} // to
leaf enabled {
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
type boolean;
description
"'true' if this connectivity entry is enabled.";
}
leaf direction {
type connectivity-direction;
description
"Indicates whether this connectivity is
uni-directional, or bi-directional. If the
relation is uni-directional, the value of
this leaf indicates the direction.";
}
} // link-termination
}
}
} // service-function-node-te-augmentation
grouping service-function-ttp-augmentation {
description
"Augmenting a tunnel termination point to be network service
aware.";
container service-function {
description
"Containing attributes related to network services and
network functions";
container tunnel-terminations {
description
"Connectivity relations between network services/functions
and tunnel termination points on a TE node, which can be
either abstract or physical.";
reference
"ETSI-NFV-YANG: ETSI GS NFV-SOL 006:
Network Functions Virtualisation (NFV) Release 3;
Protocols and Data Models;
NFV descriptors based on YANG specification.
RFC7665: Service Function Chaining (SFC) Architecture.";
list tunnel-termination {
key "id";
description
"Each entry of the list represents the connectivity
relation between a network service/function and
a tunnel termination point on a TE node.";
leaf id {
type uint32;
description "Identifies the termination entry.";
}
leaf service-function-id {
type leafref {
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
path "../../../../../../service-functions/"
+ "service-function/id";
}
description
"Reference to a service function id.";
}
leaf sf-connection-point-id {
type leafref {
path "../../../../../../service-functions/"
+ "service-function[id=current()/../"
+ "service-function-id]/connection-points/"
+ "connection-point/id";
}
description
"Reference to a SF(service function) connection point
id.";
}
leaf enabled {
type boolean;
description
"'true' if this connectivity entry is enabled.";
}
leaf direction {
type connectivity-direction;
description
"Indicates whether this connectivity is
uni-directional, or bi-directional. If the
relation is uni-directional, the value of
this leaf indicates the direction.";
}
} // link-termination
}
}
} // service-function-ttp-augmentation
grouping sf-topology-type {
description
"Identifies the SF aware TE topology type.";
container sf {
presence "Indidates that the TE topology is SF aware.";
description
"Its presence identifies that the TE topology is SF aware.";
}
} // sf-topology-type
grouping termination-point-ref {
description
"Reference to a link termination point.";
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
leaf tp-ref {
type leafref {
path "../../../../../../../nt:termination-point/"
+ "nt:tp-id";
}
description
"Reference to the link termination point.";
}
} // termination-point-ref
/*
* Augmentations
*/
/* Augmentations to network-types/te-topology */
augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:network-types/"
+ "tet:te-topology" {
description
"Defines the SF aware TE topology type.";
uses sf-topology-type;
}
/* Augmentations to te-node-attributes */
augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/tet:te/"
+ "tet:te-node-attributes" {
description
"Parameters for SF aware TE topology.";
uses service-function-node-te-augmentation;
}
/* Augmentations to information-source-entry */
augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/tet:te/"
+ "tet:information-source-entry" {
description
"Parameters for SF aware TE topology.";
uses service-function-node-te-augmentation;
}
/* Augmentations to tunnel-termination-point */
augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/tet:te/"
+ "tet:tunnel-termination-point" {
description
"Parameters for SF aware TE topology.";
uses service-function-ttp-augmentation;
}
/* Augmentations to link-termination under te-node-attributes */
augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/tet:te/"
+ "tet:te-node-attributes/tet-sf:service-function/"
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
+ "tet-sf:link-terminations/tet-sf:link-termination/"
+ "tet-sf:from" {
description
"Add reference to the link termination point.";
uses termination-point-ref;
}
/* Augmentations to link-termination under
information-source-entry */
augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/tet:te/"
+ "tet:information-source-entry/tet-sf:service-function/"
+ "tet-sf:link-terminations/tet-sf:link-termination/"
+ "tet-sf:from" {
description
"Add reference to the link termination point.";
uses termination-point-ref;
}
/* Augmentations to node */
augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node" {
description
"Available service functions on the node.";
uses service-function-node-augmentation;
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
5. IANA Considerations
This document registers the following namespace URIs in the IETF XML
registry [RFC3688]:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-te-topology-sf
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-te-topology-sf-state
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This document registers the following YANG modules in the YANG Module
Names registry [RFC6020]:
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
--------------------------------------------------------------------
name: ietf-te-topology-sf
namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-te-topology-packet
prefix: tet-sf
reference: RFC XXXX
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
name: ietf-te-topology-sf-state
namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-te-topology-packet-state
prefix: tet-sf-s
reference: RFC XXXX
--------------------------------------------------------------------
6. Security Considerations
The YANG module specified in this document defines a schema for data
that is designed to be accessed via network management protocols such
as NETCONF [RFC6241] or RESTCONF [RFC8040]. The lowest NETCONF layer
is the secure transport layer, and the mandatory-to-implement secure
transport is Secure Shell (SSH) [RFC6242]. The lowest RESTCONF layer
is HTTPS, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is TLS
[RFC8446].
The Network Configuration Access Control Model (NACM) [RFC8341]
provides the means to restrict access for particular NETCONF or
RESTCONF users to a preconfigured subset of all available NETCONF or
RESTCONF protocol operations and content.
There are a number of data nodes defined in this YANG module that are
writable/creatable/deletable (i.e., config true, which is the
default). These data nodes may be considered sensitive or vulnerable
in some network environments. Write operations (e.g., edit-config)
to these data nodes without proper protection can have a negative
effect on network operations. These are the subtrees and data nodes
and their sensitivity/vulnerability:
/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:network-types/tet:te-topology/sf
This subtree specifies the topology type. Modifying the
configurations can make topology type invalid and cause
interruption to the specified SF Aware TE topology and the related
SF Aware TE topologies.
/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/tet:te/tet:te-node-attributes/
service-function
This subtree specifies the configurations of service functions in
SF Aware TE nodes. Modifying the configurations in this subtree
can change the configurations of service functions in the
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
specified node, causing these service functions disabled or
misbehaving in the specified node.
/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/tet:te/tet:tunnel-termination-point/
service-function
This subtree specifies the configurations of service functions on
a tunnel-termination-point in SF Aware TE nodes. Modifying the
configurations in this subtree can change the configurations of
service functions on the spcified tunnel-termination-point in the
specified node, causing these service functions disabled or
misbehaving.
/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/service-functions
This subtree specifies the available service functions in SF Aware
TE nodes. Modifying the configurations in this subtree can change
the configurations of the available service functions in the
specified node, causing these service functions disabled or
misbehaving in the specified node.
Some of the readable data nodes in this YANG module may be considered
sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus
important to control read access (e.g., via get, get-config, or
notification) to these data nodes. These are the subtrees and data
nodes and their sensitivity/vulnerability:
/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:network-types/tet:te-topology/sf
Unauthorized access to this subtree can disclose the SF Aware TE
topology type.
/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/tet:te/tet:te-node-attributes/
service-function
Unauthorized access to this subtree can disclose the operational
state information of the service functions in the specified SF
Aware TE node.
/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/tet:te/tet:information-source-entry/
service-function
Unauthorized access to this subtree can disclose the operational
state information of the service functions in the specified SF
Aware TE node.
/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/tet:te/tet:tunnel-termination-point/
service-function
Unauthorized access to this subtree can disclose the operational
state information of the service functions on the specified
tunnel-termination-point in the specified SF Aware TE node.
/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/service-functions
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
Unauthorized access to this subtree can disclose the operational
state information of the availble service functions in the
specified node.
7. References
7.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>.
[RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for
the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6020>.
[RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
(NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>.
[RFC6242] Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure
Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6242>.
[RFC6991] Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types",
RFC 6991, DOI 10.17487/RFC6991, July 2013,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6991>.
[RFC7950] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language",
RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950>.
[RFC8040] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF
Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
[RFC8341] Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration
Access Control Model", STD 91, RFC 8341,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8341, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8341>.
[RFC8342] Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K.,
and R. Wilton, "Network Management Datastore Architecture
(NMDA)", RFC 8342, DOI 10.17487/RFC8342, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8342>.
[RFC8345] Clemm, A., Medved, J., Varga, R., Bahadur, N.,
Ananthakrishnan, H., and X. Liu, "A YANG Data Model for
Network Topologies", RFC 8345, DOI 10.17487/RFC8345, March
2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8345>.
[RFC8446] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446>.
[RFC8529] Berger, L., Hopps, C., Lindem, A., Bogdanovic, D., and X.
Liu, "YANG Data Model for Network Instances", RFC 8529,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8529, March 2019,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8529>.
[RFC8530] Berger, L., Hopps, C., Lindem, A., Bogdanovic, D., and X.
Liu, "YANG Model for Logical Network Elements", RFC 8530,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8530, March 2019,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8530>.
[RFC8776] Saad, T., Gandhi, R., Liu, X., Beeram, V., and I. Bryskin,
"Common YANG Data Types for Traffic Engineering",
RFC 8776, DOI 10.17487/RFC8776, June 2020,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8776>.
[RFC8795] Liu, X., Bryskin, I., Beeram, V., Saad, T., Shah, H., and
O. Gonzalez de Dios, "YANG Data Model for Traffic
Engineering (TE) Topologies", RFC 8795,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8795, August 2020,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8795>.
[I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te]
Saad, T., Gandhi, R., Liu, X., Beeram, V. P., Bryskin, I.,
and O. G. D. Dios, "A YANG Data Model for Traffic
Engineering Tunnels, Label Switched Paths and Interfaces",
draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-29 (work in progress), February
2022.
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
[I-D.ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang]
Lee, Y., Dhody, D., Ceccarelli, D., Bryskin, I., and B. Y.
Yoon, "A YANG Data Model for VN Operation", draft-ietf-
teas-actn-vn-yang-13 (work in progress), October 2021.
[ETSI-NFV-PACKAGE]
ETSI, "Network Functions Virtualisation (NFV) Release 4;
Management and Orchestration; VNF Descriptor and Packaging
Specification", ETSI GR NFV-IFA 011 V4.2.1, May 2021,
<https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_gs/NFV-
IFA/001_099/011/04.02.01_60/gs_NFV-IFA011v040201p.pdf>.
[ETSI-NFV-TERM]
ETSI, "Network Functions Virtualisation (NFV); Terminology
for Main Concepts in NFV", ETSI GR NFV 003 V1.6.1, March
2021, <https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_gr/
NFV/001_099/003/01.06.01_60/gr_NFV003v010601p.pdf>.
[ETSI-NFV-YANG]
ETSI, "Network Functions Virtualisation (NFV) Release 3;
Protocols and Data Models; NFV descriptors based on YANG
specification", ETSI GS NFV-SOL 006 V3.5.1, July 2021,
<https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_gs/NFV-
SOL/001_099/006/03.05.01_60/gs_NFV-SOL006v030501p.pdf>.
[RFC3022] Srisuresh, P. and K. Egevang, "Traditional IP Network
Address Translator (Traditional NAT)", RFC 3022,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3022, January 2001,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3022>.
[RFC6146] Bagnulo, M., Matthews, P., and I. van Beijnum, "Stateful
NAT64: Network Address and Protocol Translation from IPv6
Clients to IPv4 Servers", RFC 6146, DOI 10.17487/RFC6146,
April 2011, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6146>.
[RFC8453] Ceccarelli, D., Ed. and Y. Lee, Ed., "Framework for
Abstraction and Control of TE Networks (ACTN)", RFC 8453,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8453, August 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8453>.
[RFC8459] Dolson, D., Homma, S., Lopez, D., and M. Boucadair,
"Hierarchical Service Function Chaining (hSFC)", RFC 8459,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8459, September 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8459>.
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
[_3GPP.28.801]
3GPP, "Study on management and orchestration of network
slicing for next generation network", 3GPP TR 28.801
V2.0.0, September 2017,
<http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/28801.htm>.
7.2. Informative References
[RFC7498] Quinn, P., Ed. and T. Nadeau, Ed., "Problem Statement for
Service Function Chaining", RFC 7498,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7498, April 2015,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7498>.
[RFC7665] Halpern, J., Ed. and C. Pignataro, Ed., "Service Function
Chaining (SFC) Architecture", RFC 7665,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7665, October 2015,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7665>.
[RFC8340] Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams",
BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8340>.
[I-D.defoy-netslices-3gpp-network-slicing]
Foy, X. D. and A. Rahman, "Network Slicing - 3GPP Use
Case", draft-defoy-netslices-3gpp-network-slicing-02 (work
in progress), October 2017.
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 25]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
Appendix A. Companion YANG Model for Non-NMDA Compliant Implementations
The YANG module ietf-te-topology-sf defined in this document is
designed to be used in conjunction with implementations that support
the Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA) defined in
[RFC8342]. In order to allow implementations to use the model even
in cases when NMDA is not supported, the following companion module,
ietf-te-topology-sf-state, is defined as state model, which mirrors
the module ietf-te-topology-sf defined earlier in this document.
However, all data nodes in the companion module are non-configurable,
to represent the applied configuration or the derived operational
states.
The companion module, ietf-te-topology-sf-state, is redundant and
SHOULD NOT be supported by implementations that support NMDA.
As the structure of the companion module mirrors that of the
coorespinding NMDA model, the YANG tree of the companion module is
not depicted separately.
A.1. SF Aware TE Topology State Module
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-te-topology-sf-state@2022-02-25.yang"
module ietf-te-topology-sf-state {
yang-version 1.1;
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-te-topology-sf-state";
prefix "tet-sf-s";
import ietf-te-topology-sf {
prefix "tet-sf";
reference
"RFC XXXX: SF Aware TE Topology YANG Model";
}
import ietf-network-state {
prefix "nw-s";
reference
"RFC 8345: A YANG Data Model for Network Topologies";
}
import ietf-network-topology-state {
prefix "nt-s";
reference
"RFC 8345: A YANG Data Model for Network Topologies";
}
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 26]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
import ietf-te-topology-state {
prefix "tet-s";
reference
"RFC 8795: YANG Data Model for Traffic Engineering (TE)
Topologies";
}
organization
"Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling (TEAS)
Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/teas/>
WG List: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
Editors: Igor Bryskin
<mailto:Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com>
Xufeng Liu
<mailto:xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>";
description
"Network service and function aware aware TE topology operational
state model for non-NMDA compliant implementations.
Copyright (c) 2021 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to
the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set
forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see the
RFC itself for full legal notices.";
revision 2022-02-25 {
description "Initial revision";
reference "RFC XXXX: SF Aware TE Topology YANG Model";
}
/*
* Groupings
*/
grouping state-termination-point-ref {
description
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 27]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
"Reference to a link termination point in this non-NMDA state
module.";
leaf tp-ref {
type leafref {
path "../../../../../../../nt-s:termination-point/"
+ "nt-s:tp-id";
}
description
"Reference to the link termination point.";
}
} // termination-point-ref
/*
* Augmentations
*/
/* Augmentations to network-types/te-topology */
augment "/nw-s:networks/nw-s:network/nw-s:network-types/"
+ "tet-s:te-topology" {
description
"Defines the SF aware TE topology type.";
uses tet-sf:sf-topology-type;
}
/* Augmentations to te-node-attributes */
augment "/nw-s:networks/nw-s:network/nw-s:node/tet-s:te/"
+ "tet-s:te-node-attributes" {
description
"Parameters for SF aware TE topology.";
uses tet-sf:service-function-node-te-augmentation;
}
/* Augmentations to information-source-entry */
augment "/nw-s:networks/nw-s:network/nw-s:node/tet-s:te/"
+ "tet-s:information-source-entry" {
description
"Parameters for SF aware TE topology.";
uses tet-sf:service-function-node-te-augmentation;
}
/* Augmentations to tunnel-termination-point */
augment "/nw-s:networks/nw-s:network/nw-s:node/tet-s:te/"
+ "tet-s:tunnel-termination-point" {
description
"Parameters for SF aware TE topology.";
uses tet-sf:service-function-ttp-augmentation;
}
/* Augmentations to link-termination under te-node-attributes */
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 28]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
augment "/nw-s:networks/nw-s:network/nw-s:node/tet-s:te/"
+ "tet-s:te-node-attributes/tet-sf-s:service-function/"
+ "tet-sf-s:link-terminations/tet-sf-s:link-termination/"
+ "tet-sf-s:from" {
description
"Add reference to the link termination point.";
uses state-termination-point-ref;
}
/* Augmentations to link-termination under
information-source-entry */
augment "/nw-s:networks/nw-s:network/nw-s:node/tet-s:te/"
+ "tet-s:information-source-entry/tet-sf-s:service-function/"
+ "tet-sf-s:link-terminations/tet-sf-s:link-termination/"
+ "tet-sf-s:from" {
description
"Add reference to the link termination point.";
uses state-termination-point-ref;
}
/* Augmentations to node */
augment "/nw-s:networks/nw-s:network/nw-s:node" {
description
"Available service functions on the node.";
uses tet-sf:service-function-node-augmentation;
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
Appendix B. Data Examples
B.1. A Topology with Multiple Connected Network Functions
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 29]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
Node-1
+----o--o--------------------------o-------+
| | | | |
| \__/ \__ |
| *\/ TTP-1 * * * * * * * * * *\/* |
LTP-4 |* * * * TTP-2 * | LTP-1
o------------*-----------------------------o
| * * |
LTP-3 |* * * * * *| LTP-2
o--- -----o
| \ / |
| \ / |
| \ CP01 CP02/ |
| +----o--------------------------o------+ |
| | VL1| VL4| | |
| | |CP11 |CP33 | |
| | +-o--+ +----+ +-o--+ | |
| | |VNF1| |VNF2| |VNF3| | |
| | +-o-o+ VL2 +--o-+ VL2 +-o-o+ | |
| |CP12| |\----------/ \---------/| |CP32| |
| | | |CP13 CP21 CP31| | | |
| | | | VL2 | | | |
| | | +------------------------+ | | |
| | +----------------------------+ | |
| | VL3 | |
| | Network Service 1 | |
| +--------------------------------------+ |
+------------------------------------------+
The configuration instance data for Node-1 in the above figure could
be as follows:
{
"networks": {
"network": [
{
"network-types": {
"te-topology": {
"sf": {}
}
},
"network-id": "network-sf-aware",
"provider-id": 201,
"client-id": 300,
"te-topology-id": "te-topology:network-sf-aware",
"node": [
{
"node-id": "Node-1",
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 30]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
"te-node-id": "2.0.1.1",
"te": {
"te-node-attributes": {
"domain-id": 1,
"is-abstract": [null],
"connectivity-matrices": {
},
"service-function": {
"connectivity-matrices": {
"connectivity-matrix": [
{
"id": 10,
"from": {
"service-function-id": "Network Service 1",
"sf-connection-point-id": "CP01"
},
"to": {
"service-function-id": "VNF1",
"sf-connection-point-id": "CP11"
}
"direction": "bidir",
"virtual-link-id": "VL1"
},
{
"id": 13,
"from": {
"service-function-id": "VNF1",
"sf-connection-point-id": "CP12"
},
"to": {
"service-function-id": "VNF3",
"sf-connection-point-id": "CP32"
}
"direction": "bidir",
"virtual-link-id": "VL3"
},
{
"id": 12,
"from": {
"service-function-id": "VNF1",
"sf-connection-point-id": "CP13"
},
"to": {
"service-function-id": "VNF2",
"sf-connection-point-id": "CP21"
}
"direction": "bidir",
"virtual-link-id": "VL2"
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 31]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
},
{
"id": 23,
"from": {
"service-function-id": "VNF2",
"sf-connection-point-id": "CP21"
},
"to": {
"service-function-id": "VNF3"
"sf-connection-point-id": "CP31"
}
"direction": "bidir",
"virtual-link-id": "VL2"
},
{
"id": 30,
"from": {
"service-function-id": "Network Service 1",
"sf-connection-point-id": "CP02"
},
"to": {
"service-function-id": "VNF3",
"sf-connection-point-id": "CP33"
}
"direction": "bidir",
"virtual-link-id": "VL4"
}
]
},
"link-terminations": {
"link-termination": [
{
"id": 2,
"from": {
"tp-ref": "LTP-2"
},
"to": {
"service-function-id": "Network Service 1",
"sf-connection-point-id": "CP02"
}
"direction": "bidir"
},
{
"id": 3,
"from": {
"tp-ref": "LTP-3"
},
"to": {
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 32]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
"service-function-id": "Network Service 1",
"sf-connection-point-id": "CP01"
}
"direction": "bidir"
}
]
}
}
}
"tunnel-termination-point": [
{
"tunnel-tp-id": 10001,
"name": "TTP-1",
"service-function-terminations": {
}
},
{
"tunnel-tp-id": 10002,
"name": "TTP-2",
"service-function-terminations": {
}
}
]
},
"termination-point": [
{
"tp-id": "LTP-1",
"te-tp-id": 10001
"te": {
"interface-switching-capability": [
{
"switching-capability": "switching-l2sc",
"encoding": "lsp-encoding-ethernet"
}
]
}
},
{
"tp-id": "LTP-2",
"te-tp-id": 10002
"te": {
"interface-switching-capability": [
{
"switching-capability": "switching-l2sc",
"encoding": "lsp-encoding-ethernet"
}
]
}
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 33]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
},
{
"tp-id": "LTP-3",
"te-tp-id": 10003
"te": {
"interface-switching-capability": [
{
"switching-capability": "switching-l2sc",
"encoding": "lsp-encoding-ethernet"
}
]
}
},
{
"tp-id": "LTP-4",
"te-tp-id": 10004
"te": {
"interface-switching-capability": [
{
"switching-capability": "switching-l2sc",
"encoding": "lsp-encoding-ethernet"
}
]
}
}
]
}
]
}
]
}
}
B.2. A Topology with an Encapsulated Network Service
In this example, a network service consists of several inter-
connected network functions (NFs), and is represented by this model
as an encapsulated opaque object without the details between its
internals.
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 34]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
Node-1
+----o--o--------------------------o-------+
| | | | |
| \__/ \__ |
| *\/ TTP-1 * * * * * * * * * *\/* |
LTP-4 |* * * * TTP-2 * | LTP-1
o------------*-----------------------------o
| * * |
LTP-3 |* * * * * *| LTP-2
o--- -----o
| \ / |
| \ / |
| \ CP01 CP02/ |
| +----o--------------------------o------+ |
| | | |
| | Network Service 1 | |
| +--------------------------------------+ |
+------------------------------------------+
The configuration instance data for Node-1 in the above figure could
be as follows:
{
"networks": {
"network": [
{
"network-types": {
"te-topology": {
"sf": {}
}
},
"network-id": "network-sf-aware",
"provider-id": 201,
"client-id": 300,
"te-topology-id": "te-topology:network-sf-aware",
"node": [
{
"node-id": "Node-1",
"te-node-id": "2.0.1.1",
"te": {
"te-node-attributes": {
"domain-id": 1,
"is-abstract": [null],
"connectivity-matrices": {
},
"service-function": {
"connectivity-matrices": {
},
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 35]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
"link-terminations": {
"link-termination": [
{
"id": 2,
"from": {
"tp-ref": "LTP-2"
},
"to": {
"service-function-id": "Network Service 1",
"sf-connection-point-id": "CP02"
}
"direction": "bidir"
},
{
"id": 3,
"from": {
"tp-ref": "LTP-3"
},
"to": {
"service-function-id": "Network Service 1",
"sf-connection-point-id": "CP01"
}
"direction": "bidir"
}
]
}
}
}
"tunnel-termination-point": [
{
"tunnel-tp-id": 10001,
"name": "TTP-1",
"service-function-terminations": {
}
},
{
"tunnel-tp-id": 10002,
"name": "TTP-2",
"service-function-terminations": {
}
}
]
},
"termination-point": [
{
"tp-id": "LTP-1",
"te-tp-id": 10001
"te": {
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 36]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
"interface-switching-capability": [
{
"switching-capability": "switching-l2sc",
"encoding": "lsp-encoding-ethernet"
}
]
}
},
{
"tp-id": "LTP-2",
"te-tp-id": 10002
"te": {
"interface-switching-capability": [
{
"switching-capability": "switching-l2sc",
"encoding": "lsp-encoding-ethernet"
}
]
}
},
{
"tp-id": "LTP-3",
"te-tp-id": 10003
"te": {
"interface-switching-capability": [
{
"switching-capability": "switching-l2sc",
"encoding": "lsp-encoding-ethernet"
}
]
}
},
{
"tp-id": "LTP-4",
"te-tp-id": 10004
"te": {
"interface-switching-capability": [
{
"switching-capability": "switching-l2sc",
"encoding": "lsp-encoding-ethernet"
}
]
}
}
]
}
]
}
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 37]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
]
}
}
Appendix C. Use Cases for SF Aware Topology Models
C.1. Exporting SF/NF Information to Network Clients and Other Network
SDN Controllers
In the context of Service Function Chain (SFC) orchestration one
existing problem is that there is no way to formally describe a
Service or Network Function in a standard way (recognizable/
understood by a third party) as a resource of a network topology
node.
One implication of this is that there is no way for the orchestrator
to give a network client even a ball-park idea as to which network's
SFs/NFs are available for the client's use/control and where they are
located in the network even in terms of abstract topologies/virtual
networks configured and managed specifically for the client.
Consequently, the client has no say on how the SFCs provided for the
client by the network should be set up and managed (which SFs are to
be used and how they should be chained together, optimized,
manipulated, protected, etc.).
Likewise, there is no way for the orchestrator to export SF/NF
information to other network controllers. The SFC orchestrator may
serve, for example, a higher level controller (such as Network
Slicing Orchestrator), with the latter wanting at least some level of
control as to which SFs/NFs it wants on its SFCs and how the Service
Function Paths (SFPs) are to be routed and provisioned, especially,
if it uses services of more than one SFC orchestrator.
The issue of exporting of SF/NF information could be addressed by
defining a model, in which formally described/recognizable SF/NF
instances are presented as topological elements, for example, hosted
by TE, L3 or L2 topology nodes (see Figure 1). The model could
describe whether, how and at what costs the SFs/NFs hosted by a given
node could be chained together, how these intra-node SFCs could be
connected to the node's Service Function Forwarders (SFFs, entities
dealing with SFC NSHs and metadata), and how the SFFs could be
connected to the node's Tunnel and Link Termination Points (TTPs and
LTPs) to chain the intra-node SFCs across the network topology.
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 38]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
The figure is available in the PDF format.
Figure 1: SF/NF aware TE topology
C.2. Flat End-to-end SFCs Managed on Multi-domain Networks
SFCs may span multiple administrative domains, each of which
controlled by a separate SFC controller. The usual solution for such
a scenario is the Hierarchical SFCs (H-SFCs) [RFC8459], in which the
higher level orchestrator controls only SFs located on domain border
nodes. Said higher level SFs are chained together into higher level
SFCs via lower level (intra-domain) SFCs provisioned and controlled
independently by respective domain controllers. The decision as to
which higher level SFCs are connected to which lower level SFCs is
driven by packet re-classification every time the packet enters a
given domain. Said packet re-classification is a very time-consuming
operation. Furthermore, the independent nature of higher and lower
level SFC control is prone to configuration errors, which may lead to
long lasting loops and congestions. It is highly desirable to be
able to set up and manage SFCs spanning multiple domains in a flat
way as far as the data plane is concerned (i.e. with a single packet
classification at the ingress into the multi-domain network but
without re-classifications on domain ingress nodes).
One way to achieve this is to have the domain controllers expose SF/
NF- aware topologies, and have the higher level orchestrator operate
on the network-wide topology, the product of merging of the
topologies catered by the domain controllers. This is similar in
spirit to setting up, coordinating and managing the transport
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 39]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
connectivity (TE tunnels) on a multi-domain multi-vendor transport
network.
C.3. Managing SFCs with TE Constraints
Some SFCs require per SFC link/element and end-to-end TE constrains
(bandwidth, delay/jitter, fate sharing/diversity. etc.). Said
constraints could be ensured via carrying SFPs inside overlays that
are traffic engineered with the constrains in mind. A good analogy
would be orchestrating delay constrained L3 VPNs. One way to support
such L3 VPNs is to carry MPLS LSPs interconnecting per-VPN VRFs
inside delay constrained TE tunnels interconnecting the PEs hosting
the VRFs.
The figure is available in the PDF format.
Figure 2: L3 VPN with delay constraints
Planning, computing and provisioning of TE overlays to constrain
arbitrary SFCs, especially those that span multiple administrative
domains with each domain controlled by a separate controller, is a
very difficult challenge. Currently it is addressed by pre-
provisioning on the network of multiple TE tunnels with various TE
characteristics, and "nailing down" SFs/NFs to "strategic" locations
(e.g. nodes terminating many of such tunnels) in a hope that an
adequate set of tunnels could be found to carry the SFP of a given
TE-constrained SFC. Such an approach is especially awkward in the
case when some or all of the SFs/NFs are VNFs (i.e. could be
instantiated at multiple network locations).
SF/NF-aware TE topology model in combination with TE tunnel model
will allow for the network orchestrator (or a client controller) to
compute, set up and manipulate the TE overlays in the form of TE
tunnel chains (see Figure 3).
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 40]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
Said chains could be duel-optimized compromising on optimal SF/NF
locations with optimal TE tunnels interconnecting them. The TE
tunnel chains (carrying multiple similarly constrained SFPs) could be
adequately constrained both at individual TE tunnel level and at the
chain end-to-end level.
The figure is available in the PDF format.
Figure 3: SFC with TE constraints
C.4. SFC Protection and Load Balancing
Currently the combination of TE topology & tunnel models offers to a
network controller various capabilities to recover an individual TE
tunnel from network failures occurred on one or more network links or
transit nodes on the TE paths taken by the TE tunnel's connection(s).
However, there is no simple way to recover a TE tunnel from a failure
affecting its source or destination node. SF/NF-aware TE topology
model can decouple the association of a given SF/NF with its location
on the network topology by presenting multiple, identifiable as
mutually substitutable SFs/NFs hosted by different TE topology nodes.
So, for example, if it is detected that a given TE tunnel destination
node is malfunctioning or has gone out of service, the TE tunnel
could be re-routed to terminate on a different node hosting
functionally the same SFs/NFs as ones hosted by the failed node (see
Figures 6).
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 41]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
This is in line with the ACTN edge migration and function mobility
concepts [RFC8453]. It is important to note that the described
strategy works much better for the stateless SFs/NFs. This is
because getting the alternative stateful SFs/NFs into the same
respective states as the current (i.e. active, affected by failure)
are is a very difficult challenge.
The figure is available in the PDF format.
Figure 4: SFC recovery: SF2 on node NE1 fails
At the SFC level the SF/NF-aware TE topology model can offer SFC
dynamic restoration capabilities against failed/malfunctioning SFs/
NFs by identifying and provisioning detours to a TE tunnel chain, so
that it starts carrying the SFC's SFPs towards healthy SFs/NFs that
are functionally the same as the failed ones. Furthermore, multiple
parallel TE tunnel chains could be pre-provisioned for the purpose of
SFC load balancing and end-to-end protection. In the latter case
said parallel TE tunnel chains could be placed to be sufficiently
disjoint from each other.
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 42]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
The figure is available in the PDF format.
Figure 5: SFC recovery: SFC SF1-SF2-SF6 is recovered after SF2 on
node N1 has failed
The figure is available in the PDF format.
Figure 6: SFC recovery: SFC SF1-SF2-SF6 is recovered after node N1
has failed
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 43]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
C.5. Network Clock Synchronization
Many current and future network applications (including 5g and IoT
applications) require very accurate time services (PTP level, ns
resolution). One way to implement the adequate network clock
synchronization for such services is via describing network clocks as
NFs on an NF-aware TE topology optimized to have best possible delay
variation characteristics. Because such a topology will contain
delay/delay variation metrics of topology links and node cross-
connects, as well as costs in terms of delay/delay variation of
connecting clocks to hosting them node link and tunnel termination
points, it will be possible to dynamically select and provision bi-
directional time-constrained deterministic paths or trees connecting
clocks (e.g. grand master and boundary clocks) for the purpose of
exchange of clock synchronization information. Note that network
clock aware TE topologies separately provided by domain controllers
will enable multi-domain network orchestrator to set up and
manipulate the clock synchronization paths/trees spanning multiple
network domains.
C.6. Client - Provider Network Slicing Interface
3GPP defines network slice as "a set of network functions and the
resources for these network functions which are arranged and
configured, forming a complete logical network to meet certain
network characteristics" [I-D.defoy-netslices-3gpp-network-slicing]
[_3GPP.28.801]. Network slice could be also defined as a logical
partition of a provider's network that is owned and managed by a
tenant. SF/NF-aware TE topology model has a potential to support a
very important interface between network slicing clients and
providers because, on the one hand, the model can describe
holistically and hierarchically the client's requirements and
preferences with respect to a network slice functional, topological
and traffic engineering aspects, as well as of the degree of resource
separation/ sharing between the slices, thus allowing for the client
(up to agreed upon extent) to dynamically (re-)configure the slice or
(re-)schedule said (re-)configurations in time, while, on the other
hand, allowing for the provider to convey to the client the slice's
operational state information and telemetry the client has expressed
interest in.
C.7. Dynamic Assignment of Regenerators for L0 Services
On large optical networks, some of provided to their clients L0
services could not be provisioned as single OCh trails, rather, as
chains of such trails interconnected via regenerators, such as 3R
regenerators. Current practice of the provisioning of such services
requires configuration of explicit paths (EROs) describing identity
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 44]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
and location of regenerators to be used. A solution is highly
desirable that could:
o Identify such services based, for example, on optical impairment
computations;
o Assign adequate for the services regenerators dynamically out of
the regenerators that are grouped together in pools and
strategically scattered over the network topology nodes;
o Compute and provision supporting the services chains of optical
trails interconnected via so selected regenerators, optimizing the
chains to use minimal number of regenerators, their optimal
locations, as well as optimality of optical paths interconnecting
them;
o Ensure recovery of such chains from any failures that could happen
on links, nodes or regenerators along the chain path.
NF-aware TE topology model (in this case L1 NF-aware L0 topology
model) is just the model that could provide a network controller (or
even a client controller operating on abstract NF-aware topologies
provided by the network) to realize described above computations and
orchestrate the service provisioning and network failure recovery
operations (see Figure 7).
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 45]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
The figure is available in the PDF format.
Figure 7: Optical tunnel as TE-constrained SFC of 3R regenerators.
Red trail (not regenerated) is not optically reachable, but blue
trail (twice regenerated) is
C.8. Dynamic Assignment of OAM Functions for L1 Services
OAM functionality is normally managed by configuring and manipulating
TCM/MEP functions on network ports terminating connections or their
segments over which OAM operations, such as performance monitoring,
are required to be performed. In some layer networks (e.g.
Ethernet) said TCMs/MEPs could be configured on any network ports.
In others (e.g. OTN/ODUk) the TCMs/MEPs could be configured on some
(but not all network ports) due to the fact that the OAM
functionality (i.e. recognizing and processing of OAM messages,
supporting OAM protocols and FSMs) requires in these layer networks
certain support in the data plane, which is not available on all
network nodes. This makes TCMs/MEPs good candidates to be modeled as
NFs. This also makes TCM/MEP aware topology model a good basis for
placing dynamically an ODUk connection to pass through optimal OAM
locations without mandating the client to specify said locations
explicitly.
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 46]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
The figure is available in the PDF format.
Figure 8: Compute/storage resource aware topology
C.9. SFC Abstraction and Scaling
SF/NF-aware topology may contain information on native SFs/NFs (i.e.
SFs/NFs as known to the provider itself) and/or abstract SFs/NFs
(i.e. logical/macro SFs/NFs representing one or more SFCs each made
of native and/or lower level abstract SFs/NFs). As in the case of
abstracting topology nodes, abstracting SFs/NFs is hierarchical in
nature - the higher level of SF/NF-aware topology, the "larger"
abstract SFs/NFs are, i.e. the larger data plane SFCs they represent.
This allows for managing large scale networks with great number of
SFs/NFs (such as Data Center interconnects) in a hierarchical, highly
scalable manner resulting in control of very large number of flat in
the data plane SFCs that span multiple domains.
C.10. Dynamic Compute/VM/Storage Resource Assignment
In a distributed data center network, virtual machines for compute
resources may need to be dynamically re-allocated due to various
reasons such as DCI network failure, compute resource load balancing,
etc. In many cases, the DCI connectivity for the source and the
destination is not predetermined. There may be a pool of sources and
a pool of destination data centers associated with re-allocation of
compute/VM/storage resources. There is no good mechanism to date to
capture this dynamicity nature of compute/VM/storage resource
reallocation. Generic Compute/VM/Storage resources can be described
and announced as a SF, where a DC hosting these resources can be
modeled as an abstract node. Topology interconnecting these abstract
nodes (DCs) in general is of multi-domain nature. Thus, SF-aware
topology model can facilitate a joint optimization of TE network
resources and Compute/VM/Storage resources and solve Compute/VM/
Storage mobility problem within and between DCs (see Figure 8).
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 47]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
C.11. Application-aware Resource Operations and Management
Application stratum is the functional grouping which encompasses
application resources and the control and management of these
resources. These application resources are used along with network
services to provide an application service to clients/end-users.
Application resources are non-network resources critical to achieving
the application service functionality. Examples of application
resources include: caches, mirrors, application specific servers,
content, large data sets, and computing power. Application service
is a networked application offered to a variety of clients (e.g.,
server backup, VM migration, video cache, virtual network on-demand,
5G network slicing, etc.). The application servers that host these
application resources can be modeled as an abstract node. There may
be a variety of server types depending on the resources they host.
Figure 9 shows one example application aware topology for video cache
server distribution.
The figure is available in the PDF format.
Figure 9: Application aware topology
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 48]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
C.12. Interconnection between Service Functions/Termination Points in
uCPE
Universal Customer Premises Equipment (uCPE) enables Virtual Network
Functions (VNFs) at the client site. uCPE is based on the Network
Function Virtualization Infrastructure (NFVI) - generally Linux
distribution with integrated software that offers:
o Virtual Switch functionality
o Full virtualization/containerization solution
o Data path acceleration tool-kits
o Management layer
The sf-aware-topo-model placed in the controller controls via the
management layer of uCPE the interconnection between:
o virtual ports of VNFs
o virtual ports of Virtual Switch abstraction elements
o physical ports of uCPE
Figure 10 shows an example application aware topology for
interconnection between Logical Network Elements [RFC8530], Network
Instances [RFC8529], uCPE node Termination Points [RFC8345]. In
Figure 10 the following elements are presented:
o 3 Logical Network Elements (vCPEL3_WAN1,vCPEL3_WAN2,vSD-WAN)
o 4 Network Instances (vCPEL2)
o 4 Termination Points (Physical Ports)
There are two types of access provided to the client.
The 1st access "Internet" topology part: 1st uCPE Termination Point
"WAN1_port_internet" -- NI (vCPEL2) -- LNE (vCPEL3_telco_internet) --
NI (vCPEL2) -- vSD-WAN_port_internet.
The 2nd access "MPLS" topology part: 2nd Termination Point
"WAN2_port_mpls" -- NI (vCPEL2) -- LNE (vCPEL3_telco_mpls) -- NI
(vCPEL2) -- vSD-WAN_port_mpls.
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 49]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
Finally SD-WAN balances the traffic via two WAN ports (Termination
Points) of uCPE and shares the connection to LAN ports (Termination
Points).
The figure is available in the PDF format.
Figure 10: uCPE Service Functions topology
An example of an instance data tree in the XML format is presented in
Figure 12, following the uCPE Service Functions topology presented in
Figure 11.
For this example, the interconnection goes as follows: Network-facing
Provider Edge (N-PE) router -- User-facing Provider Edge (U-PE)
router -- uCPE ( Termination Point WAN -- NI (vCPEL2) -- LNE (vCPEL3)
)
In uCPE, Termination Point (WAN) has id 1. On the NNI
(connectionpoint_id == 10) port of NI the trunk mode is configured.
On UNI ports of NI (cp_id == 13) access mode is configured. Port
with cp_id == 13 is connected to LNE cp_id = 1.
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 50]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
The figure is available in the PDF format.
Figure 11: uCPE Service Functions topology (simple)
<config>
<networks xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-network">
<network>
<network-id>network1</network-id>
<network-types>
<te-topology
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-te-topology">
<sf xmlns=
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-te-topology-sf"/>
</te-topology>
</network-types>
<node>
<node-id>uCPE1</node-id>
<termination-point
xmlns=
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-network-topology">
<tp-id>1</tp-id>
<tp-properties
xmlns=
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ucpe-node-type">
<ethernet>
<duplex>full</duplex>
</ethernet>
<mtu>1500</mtu>
<type>dpdk</type>
</tp-properties>
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 51]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
</termination-point>
<termination-point
xmlns=
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-network-topology">
<tp-id>2</tp-id>
</termination-point>
<termination-point
xmlns=
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-network-topology">
<tp-id>3</tp-id>
</termination-point>
<te-node-id
xmlns= "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-te-topology"
>0.0.0.0</te-node-id>
<te xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-te-topology">
<te-node-attributes>
<service-function
xmlns=
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-te-topology-sf">
<connectivity-matrices>
<connectivity-matrix>
<id>1</id>
<from>
<service-function-id>CPEL3</service-function-id>
<sf-connection-point-id
>1</sf-connection-point-id>
</from>
<to>
<service-function-id>CPEL2</service-function-id>
<sf-connection-point-id
>13</sf-connection-point-id>
</to>
<enabled>true</enabled>
<virtual-link-id>l10</virtual-link-id>
</connectivity-matrix>
</connectivity-matrices>
<link-terminations>
<link-termination>
<id>2</id>
<from>
<tp-ref>1</tp-ref>
</from>
<to>
<service-function-id>CPEL2</service-function-id>
<sf-connection-point-id
>10</sf-connection-point-id>
</to>
<virtual-link-id
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 52]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
xmlns=
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ucpe-lt-virtual-link-id"
>l11</virtual-link-id>
</link-termination>
</link-terminations>
</service-function>
</te-node-attributes>
</te>
<node-type
xmlns=
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ucpe-node-type"
>ucpe</node-type>
</node>
<node>
<node-id>N-PE</node-id>
<termination-point
xmlns=
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-network-topology">
<tp-id>1</tp-id>
</termination-point>
<termination-point
xmlns=
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-network-topology">
<tp-id>2</tp-id>
</termination-point>
<termination-point
xmlns=
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-network-topology">
<tp-id>3</tp-id>
</termination-point>
<termination-point
xmlns=
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-network-topology">
<tp-id>4</tp-id>
</termination-point>
</node>
<node>
<node-id>U-PE</node-id>
<termination-point
xmlns=
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-network-topology">
<tp-id>1</tp-id>
</termination-point>
<termination-point
xmlns=
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-network-topology">
<tp-id>2</tp-id>
</termination-point>
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 53]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
<termination-point
xmlns=
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-network-topology">
<tp-id>3</tp-id>
</termination-point>
<termination-point
xmlns=
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-network-topology">
<tp-id>4</tp-id>
</termination-point>
</node>
<link
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-network-topology">
<link-id>1</link-id>
<source>
<source-node>N-PE</source-node>
<source-tp>2</source-tp>
</source>
<destination>
<dest-node>U-PE</dest-node>
<dest-tp>1</dest-tp>
</destination>
</link>
<link
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-network-topology">
<link-id>2</link-id>
<source>
<source-node>U-PE</source-node>
<source-tp>2</source-tp>
</source>
<destination>
<dest-node>uCPE1</dest-node>
<dest-tp>1</dest-tp>
</destination>
</link>
</network>
</networks>
<logical-network-elements
xmlns=
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-logical-network-element">
<logical-network-element>
<name>CPEL3</name>
<logical-network-element-properties
xmlns=
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ucpe-lne-properties">
<etsi>
<vnfd>CPEL3</vnfd>
<vdu>small</vdu>
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 54]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
</etsi>
<supporting-node>uCPE1</supporting-node>
</logical-network-element-properties>
</logical-network-element>
</logical-network-elements>
<network-instances
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-network-instance">
<network-instance>
<name>CPEL2</name>
<network-instance-properties
xmlns=
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ucpe-ni-properties">
<sf-connection-points>
<sf-connection-point-id>10</sf-connection-point-id>
<dot1q-vlan>
<trunk-allowed-vlans>X</trunk-allowed-vlans>
<trunk-allowed-vlans>Y</trunk-allowed-vlans>
<trunk-allowed-vlans>Z</trunk-allowed-vlans>
</dot1q-vlan>
</sf-connection-points>
<sf-connection-points>
<sf-connection-point-id>11</sf-connection-point-id>
<dot1q-vlan>
<access-tag>X</access-tag>
</dot1q-vlan>
</sf-connection-points>
<sf-connection-points>
<sf-connection-point-id>12</sf-connection-point-id>
<dot1q-vlan>
<access-tag>Z</access-tag>
</dot1q-vlan>
</sf-connection-points>
<sf-connection-points>
<sf-connection-point-id>13</sf-connection-point-id>
<dot1q-vlan>
<access-tag>Y</access-tag>
</dot1q-vlan>
</sf-connection-points>
<ni-area>wan</ni-area>
<supporting-node>uCPE1</supporting-node>
</network-instance-properties>
</network-instance>
</network-instances>
</config>
Figure 12: uCPE Service Funcitons topology YIN example
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 55]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Maarten Vissers, Joel Halpern, and
Greg Mirsky for their helpful comments and valuable contributions.
Authors' Addresses
Igor Bryskin
Individual
EMail: i_bryskin@yahoo.com
Xufeng Liu
IBM Corporation
EMail: xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com
Young Lee
Samsung Electronics
EMail: younglee.tx@gmail.com
Jim Guichard
Huawei Technologies
EMail: james.n.guichard@huawei.com
Luis Miguel Contreras Murillo
Telefonica
EMail: luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com
Daniele Ceccarelli
Ericsson
EMail: daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com
Jeff Tantsura
Apstra Networks
EMail: jefftant.ietf@gmail.com
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 56]
Internet-Draft SF Aware Topo YANG Model February 2022
Dmytro Shytyi
SFR
Paris
France
EMail: ietf.dmytro@shytyi.net
Bryskin, et al. Expires August 31, 2022 [Page 57]