Addition of Camellia Cipher Suites to Transport Layer Security (TLS)
draft-ietf-tls-camellia-06
Yes
(Russ Housley)
No Objection
(Alex Zinin)
(Bert Wijnen)
(David Kessens)
(Jon Peterson)
(Margaret Cullen)
(Sam Hartman)
(Ted Hardie)
(Thomas Narten)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.
Russ Housley Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Alex Zinin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Allison Mankin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2005-01-19)
Unknown
RFC 3967 did not end up stating explicitly that any Informational RFC encryption document may be a normative references for a PS - so is it ok that this document down-references to the Camellia Informational RFC without having announced doing so in the Last Call? We should just note that this is the right category for such a waiver. The RFC 2119 terminology is not needed - there are no uses.
Bert Wijnen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Harald Alvestrand Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2005-01-20)
Unknown
Reviewed by John Loughney, Gen-ART His review: Ready for publication, with some minor nits. Nits: 1) Introduction says: Note: This work was done when the first author worked for NTT. It might be better to put this in the acknowledgements. 2) Section "1.2. Terminology" uses RFC 2119 terminology, but it isn't used elsewhere in the document, so this section can be removed. 3) Missing IANA considerations section, so one should be added.
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Margaret Cullen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Scott Hollenbeck Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2005-01-13)
Unknown
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Thomas Narten Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown