Addition of Camellia Cipher Suites to Transport Layer Security (TLS)
draft-ietf-tls-camellia-06
Revision differences
Document history
| Date | Rev. | By | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2005-01-25
|
06 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza |
|
2005-01-24
|
06 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
|
2005-01-24
|
06 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
|
2005-01-24
|
06 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
|
2005-01-21
|
06 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2005-01-20 |
|
2005-01-20
|
06 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza |
|
2005-01-20
|
06 | Thomas Narten | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Thomas Narten by Thomas Narten |
|
2005-01-20
|
06 | Alex Zinin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin |
|
2005-01-20
|
06 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen |
|
2005-01-20
|
06 | Harald Alvestrand | [Ballot comment] Reviewed by John Loughney, Gen-ART His review: Ready for publication, with some minor nits. Nits: 1) Introduction says: Note: This work was done … [Ballot comment] Reviewed by John Loughney, Gen-ART His review: Ready for publication, with some minor nits. Nits: 1) Introduction says: Note: This work was done when the first author worked for NTT. It might be better to put this in the acknowledgements. 2) Section "1.2. Terminology" uses RFC 2119 terminology, but it isn't used elsewhere in the document, so this section can be removed. 3) Missing IANA considerations section, so one should be added. |
|
2005-01-20
|
06 | Harald Alvestrand | [Ballot comment] Reviewed by John Loughney, Gen-ART His review: Ready for publication, with some minor nits. Nits: 1) Introduction says: Note: This work was done … [Ballot comment] Reviewed by John Loughney, Gen-ART His review: Ready for publication, with some minor nits. Nits: 1) Introduction says: Note: This work was done when the first author worked for NTT. It might be better to put this in the acknowledgements. 2) Section "1.2. Terminology" uses RFC 2119 terminology, but it isn't used elsewhere in the document, so this section can be removed. 3) Missing IANA considerations section, so one should be added. |
|
2005-01-20
|
06 | Harald Alvestrand | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Harald Alvestrand by Harald Alvestrand |
|
2005-01-20
|
06 | Jon Peterson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson |
|
2005-01-20
|
06 | Michelle Cotton | IANA Comments: There is no IANA Considerations section. There is mention of of some ciphersuites. We would like to confirm that there is nothing for … IANA Comments: There is no IANA Considerations section. There is mention of of some ciphersuites. We would like to confirm that there is nothing for the IANA to do for this document. |
|
2005-01-19
|
06 | Allison Mankin | [Ballot comment] RFC 3967 did not end up stating explicitly that any Informational RFC encryption document may be a normative references for a PS - … [Ballot comment] RFC 3967 did not end up stating explicitly that any Informational RFC encryption document may be a normative references for a PS - so is it ok that this document down-references to the Camellia Informational RFC without having announced doing so in the Last Call? We should just note that this is the right category for such a waiver. The RFC 2119 terminology is not needed - there are no uses. |
|
2005-01-19
|
06 | Allison Mankin | [Ballot comment] RFC 3967 did not end up stating explicitly that any Informational RFC encryption document may be a normative references for a PS - … [Ballot comment] RFC 3967 did not end up stating explicitly that any Informational RFC encryption document may be a normative references for a PS - so is it ok that this document down-references to the Camellia Informational RFC without having announced doing so in the Last Call? We should just note that this is the right category for such a waiver. |
|
2005-01-19
|
06 | Allison Mankin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin |
|
2005-01-19
|
06 | David Kessens | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens |
|
2005-01-19
|
06 | Margaret Cullen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman |
|
2005-01-17
|
06 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie |
|
2005-01-15
|
06 | Sam Hartman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sam Hartman by Sam Hartman |
|
2005-01-13
|
06 | Scott Hollenbeck | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Scott Hollenbeck has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Scott Hollenbeck |
|
2005-01-13
|
06 | Scott Hollenbeck | [Ballot comment] Should the document note somewhere that it is updating the list of ciphersuites described in RFC 2246? More pointedly, does this document … |
|
2005-01-13
|
06 | Scott Hollenbeck | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck |
|
2005-01-12
|
06 | Russ Housley | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2005-01-20 by Russ Housley |
|
2005-01-12
|
06 | Russ Housley | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup by Russ Housley |
|
2005-01-12
|
06 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Russ Housley |
|
2005-01-12
|
06 | Russ Housley | Ballot has been issued by Russ Housley |
|
2005-01-12
|
06 | Russ Housley | Created "Approve" ballot |
|
2005-01-10
|
06 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system |
|
2004-12-27
|
06 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
|
2004-12-27
|
06 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
|
2004-12-24
|
06 | Russ Housley | Last Call was requested by Russ Housley |
|
2004-12-24
|
06 | Russ Housley | State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Russ Housley |
|
2004-12-24
|
06 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
|
2004-12-24
|
06 | (System) | Last call text was added |
|
2004-12-24
|
06 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
|
2004-12-24
|
06 | Sam Hartman | State Changes to Publication Requested from Last Call Requested by Sam Hartman |
|
2004-12-24
|
06 | Sam Hartman | Not mine so I'm bumping it back to consistent state rather than hitting the last call button |
|
2004-11-12
|
06 | Russ Housley | Shepherding AD has been changed to Russ Housley from Steve Bellovin |
|
2004-11-03
|
06 | Steven Bellovin | State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Steve Bellovin |
|
2004-10-22
|
06 | Steven Bellovin | State Changes to AD Evaluation from AD is watching by Steve Bellovin |
|
2004-10-22
|
06 | Steven Bellovin | State Change Notice email list have been change to , ekr@rtfm.com,shiho@rd.scei.sony.co.jp,akato@po.ntts.co.jp, from |
|
2004-10-22
|
06 | Steven Bellovin | Intended Status has been changed to Proposed Standard from None |
|
2004-10-21
|
06 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-tls-camellia-06.txt |
|
2004-10-11
|
05 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-tls-camellia-05.txt |
|
2004-02-18
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-tls-camellia-04.txt |
|
2004-02-16
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-tls-camellia-03.txt |
|
2003-06-11
|
06 | Steven Bellovin | Draft Added by Bellovin, Steve |
|
2002-08-06
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-tls-camellia-02.txt |
|
2001-05-30
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-tls-camellia-01.txt |
|
2000-10-03
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-tls-camellia-00.txt |