Secure Negotiation of Incompatible Protocols in TLS
draft-ietf-tls-snip-02
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(tls WG)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Martin Thomson | ||
| Last updated | 2023-01-01 (Latest revision 2022-06-30) | ||
| Replaces | draft-thomson-tls-snip | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
An extension is defined for TLS that allows a client and server to detect an attempt to force the use of less-preferred application protocol even where protocol options are incompatible. This supplements application-layer protocol negotiation (ALPN), which allows choices between compatible protocols to be authenticated.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)