A Critique of Existing URN Proposals
draft-ietf-uri-urn-madsen-critique-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(candidate for uribof WG)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Mark Madsen | ||
| Last updated | 1995-08-22 | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | WG state | Call For Adoption By WG Issued | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document criticises existing URN (Uniform Resource Name) proposals in the light of generality, extensibility, and general futureproofing. The idea is to draw upon the best characteristics of the existing proposals so as to converge on an acceptably functional and nonrestrictive draft specification for both URN syntax and resolution schemes.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)