Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace Registration Transition
draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-08

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.

Alexey Melnikov Yes

Alia Atlas No Objection

Deborah Brungard No Objection

Ben Campbell No Objection

Comment (2017-08-02)
I have a different take on Adam's discuss point. I don't think its appropriate for this draft to both obsolete 3044 and 3187 and make them historical. This draft doesn't replace them. And since IANA may have to deal with a mix of old and new templates for some transition period, it doesn't remove the need for them. 

Instead, I think it would make more sense for this draft to just change their status to historical, but not obsolete them. And also mention that in the abstract :-) .

Spencer Dawkins No Objection

Suresh Krishnan No Objection

Warren Kumari No Objection

Mirja K├╝hlewind No Objection

Terry Manderson No Objection

Kathleen Moriarty No Objection

Eric Rescorla No Objection

Adam Roach (was Discuss, No Objection) No Objection

Comment (2017-08-07)
The text in the RFC editor note looks fine to me. If you'd like to work with the author to refine the phrasing, I'm okay with variations in how this is worded.