Skip to main content

IPv6 CE Routers LAN Prefix Delegation
draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd-07

Document Type Active Internet-Draft (v6ops WG)
Author Timothy Winters
Last updated 2025-05-16 (Latest revision 2025-04-21)
Replaces draft-winters-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd
RFC stream Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
Intended RFC status Informational
Formats
Reviews
Additional resources Mailing list discussion
Stream WG state Submitted to IESG for Publication
Document shepherd Ron Bonica
Shepherd write-up Show Last changed 2025-01-24
IESG IESG state IESG Evaluation
Action Holder
Consensus boilerplate Yes
Telechat date On agenda of 2025-05-22 IESG telechat
Has enough positions to pass.
Responsible AD Mohamed Boucadair
Send notices to rbonica@juniper.net
IANA IANA review state IANA OK - No Actions Needed
draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd-07
Internet Engineering Task Force                               T. Winters
Internet-Draft                                                   QA Cafe
Updates: 7084 (if approved)                                21 April 2025
Intended status: Informational                                          
Expires: 23 October 2025

                 IPv6 CE Routers LAN Prefix Delegation
                     draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd-07

Abstract

   This document defines requirements for IPv6 Customer Edge (CE)
   routers to support DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for distributing unused
   prefixes that were delegated to a IPv6 CE router.  This document
   updates RFC 7084.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on 23 October 2025.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2025 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
   license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
   Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
   and restrictions with respect to this document.  Code Components
   extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
   described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
   provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.

Winters                  Expires 23 October 2025                [Page 1]
Internet-Draft    IPv6 CE Routers LAN Prefix Delegation       April 2025

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   3.  Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   4.  IPv6 End-User Network Architecture  . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   5.  Requirements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     5.1.  LAN Prefix Delegation Requirements (LPD)  . . . . . . . .   4
   6.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   7.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   8.  Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   9.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     9.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     9.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7

1.  Introduction

   This document defines requirements for DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation in
   IPv6 Customer Edge (CE) routers ([RFC7084]) in order to properly
   utilize the IPv6 prefixes assigned by service providers.  Many
   service providers assign larger address blocks than /64 to CE
   routers, as recommended in [RFC6177].  If an IPv6 CE router does not
   support the Identity Association for Prefix Delegation (IA_PD) Prefix
   Option (Section 21.21 of [RFC8415]) on the LAN, it will not be able
   to assign any prefixes beyond its local interfaces, limiting the
   usefulness of assigning prefixes larger than /64 by the operator.
   Supporting IA_PD on the LAN interfaces of a CE Router will allow
   those unused prefixes to be distributed into a network.  Note that
   efforts such as Stub Networking Auto Configuration (SNAC) Working
   Group that depends on IPv6 prefixes being properly distributed in the
   LAN.

   Two models, hierarchical prefix and flat, were proposed in the past
   for prefix sub-delegation beyond an IPv6 CE router.  Hierarchical
   prefix delegation requires an IPv6 CE router to sub delegate IPv6
   prefixes based on set of rules.  If more than one router uses
   hierarchical prefix delegation, an IPv6 prefix tree is created.  When
   no routing protocol is enabled to discover the network topology, it
   is possible to have unbalanced prefix delegation tree which leads to
   running out of prefixes.  More information on heirarchical prefix
   delegation can be found, e.g., in Section 8.5 of CableLabs IPv6
   eRouter Specifiction [eRouter].  A flat prefix delegation requires
   the router to be provisioned with the initial prefix and to assign
   /64 prefixes to all other prefix requests from routers in the LAN-
   facing interface.  The default configuration of CE Router supporting
   prefix delegation is designed to be a flat model to support zero
   configuration networking.

Winters                  Expires 23 October 2025                [Page 2]
Internet-Draft    IPv6 CE Routers LAN Prefix Delegation       April 2025

   This document does not cover dealing with multi-provisioned networks
   with more than one provider.  Due to complexity of a solution that
   would require routing, provisioning and policy, this is out of scope
   of this document.

2.  Requirements Language

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
   BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
   capitals, as shown here.

3.  Terminology

   The following terminology is defined for this document.

   *  IPv6 node: a device that implements IPv6

   *  IPv6 router: a node that forwards IPv6 packets not explicitly
      addressed to itself.

   *  IPv6 host: Any IPv6 node that is not a router.

   *  ULA:Unique Local Address as defined in [RFC4193].

   *  GUA:Global Unique Addresses as defined in [RFC4291].

4.  IPv6 End-User Network Architecture

   The end-user network for IPv6 that is a stub network.  Figure 1
   illustrates the model topology.

Winters                  Expires 23 October 2025                [Page 3]
Internet-Draft    IPv6 CE Routers LAN Prefix Delegation       April 2025

                        +-----------+
                        |  Service  |
                        |  Provider |
                        |   Router  |
                        +-----+-----+
                              |
                              |
                              |  Customer
                              |  Internet Connection
                              |
                        +-----v-----+
                        |   IPv6    |
                        |    CE     |
                        |  Router   |
                        +-----+-----+
                              |
                       +------+-------+
                       |              |
                       |              |
                   +---+----+   +-----+------+
                   |  IPv6  |   |            |
                   |  Host  |   |  Router    |
                   |        |   |            |
                   +--------+   +------------+

                  Figure 1: Example IPv6 End User Topology

5.  Requirements

   IPv6 CE router distribute configuration information obtained during
   WAN interface provisioning to LAN-facing IPv6 hosts and routers.  An
   [RFC7084] compliant CE router would only provide IPv6 hosts with
   configuration information.  This allows for addressing and routing of
   IPv6 prefixes to both hosts and routers.  These requirements are in
   addition to the ones in Section 4.3 of [RFC7084].

5.1.  LAN Prefix Delegation Requirements (LPD)

   LPD-1:   IPv6 CE routers MUST support IPv6 prefix assignment
            according to [RFC8415] (Identity Association for Prefix
            Delegation (IA_PD) option) on its LAN interface.

   LPD-2:   IPv6 CE routers MUST assign a prefix from the delegated
            prefix as specified by L-2 in Section 4.3 of [RFC7084].  If
            insufficient prefixes are available the IPv6 CE Router
            SHOULD log a system management error.

Winters                  Expires 23 October 2025                [Page 4]
Internet-Draft    IPv6 CE Routers LAN Prefix Delegation       April 2025

   LPD-3:   The prefix assigned to a link MUST NOT change in the absence
            of a local policy or a topology change.

   LPD-4:   After LAN link prefix assignments, the IPv6 CE router MUST
            make the remaining IPv6 prefixes available to other routers
            via Prefix Delegation.

   LPD-5:   IPv6 CE routers MUST maintain a local routing table that is
            dynamically updated with leases and the associated next hops
            as they are delegated to clients.  When a delegated prefix
            is released or expires, the associated route MUST be removed
            from the IPv6 CE router's routing table.

   LPD-6:   By default, the IPv6 CE router filtering rules MUST allow
            forwarding of packets with an outer IPv6 header containing a
            source address belonging to Delegated Prefixes, along with
            reciprocal packets from the same flow, following the
            recommendations of [RFC6092].  This updates WPD-5 of
            [RFC7084] to not drop packets from prefixes that have been
            delegated.  IPv6 CE routers MUST continue to drop packets
            destination address that is not assigned to the LAN or
            delegated.

   LPD-7:   The IPv6 CE routers MUST provision IA_PD prefixes with a
            prefix-length of 64 on the LAN-facing interface unless
            configured to use a different prefix-length or the CE Router
            administrator.  The prefix length of 64 is used as that is
            the current prefix length supported by SLAAC.  For
            hierarchical prefix delegation a prefix-length shorter then
            64 may be configured.

   LPD-8:   IPv6 CE routers configured to generate a ULA prefix as
            defined in ULA-1 of Section 4.3 of [RFC7084] MUST continue
            to provision available GUA IPv6 prefixes.

   LPD-9:   If an IPv6 CE router is provisioning both ULA and GUA via
            prefix delegation, the GUA SHOULD appear first in the
            packet.

   LPD-10:  IPv6 CE routers MUST NOT delegate prefixes via DHCPv6 on the
            LAN using lifetimes that exceed the remaining lifetimes of
            the corresponding prefixes learned on the WAN.

6.  Security Considerations

   This document does not add any new security considerations beyond
   those mentioned in Section 4 of [RFC8213], Section 22 of [RFC8415]
   and [RFC6092].

Winters                  Expires 23 October 2025                [Page 5]
Internet-Draft    IPv6 CE Routers LAN Prefix Delegation       April 2025

7.  IANA Considerations

   This document makes no request of IANA.

8.  Acknowledgements

   Thanks to the following people for their guidance and feedback:
   Marion Dillon, Erik Auerswald, Esko Dijk, Tim Carlin, Richard
   Patterson, Ted Lemon, Michael Richardson, Martin Huneki, Gabor
   Lencse, Ole Troan, Brian Carpenter, David Farmer, Kyle Rose, Mohamed
   Boucadair, Tim Chown, Ron Bonica, and Erica Johnson.

9.  References

9.1.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

   [RFC4193]  Hinden, R. and B. Haberman, "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast
              Addresses", RFC 4193, DOI 10.17487/RFC4193, October 2005,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4193>.

   [RFC4291]  Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing
              Architecture", RFC 4291, DOI 10.17487/RFC4291, February
              2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4291>.

   [RFC6092]  Woodyatt, J., Ed., "Recommended Simple Security
              Capabilities in Customer Premises Equipment (CPE) for
              Providing Residential IPv6 Internet Service", RFC 6092,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC6092, January 2011,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6092>.

   [RFC6177]  Narten, T., Huston, G., and L. Roberts, "IPv6 Address
              Assignment to End Sites", BCP 157, RFC 6177,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC6177, March 2011,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6177>.

   [RFC7084]  Singh, H., Beebee, W., Donley, C., and B. Stark, "Basic
              Requirements for IPv6 Customer Edge Routers", RFC 7084,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC7084, November 2013,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7084>.

   [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
              2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
              May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.

Winters                  Expires 23 October 2025                [Page 6]
Internet-Draft    IPv6 CE Routers LAN Prefix Delegation       April 2025

   [RFC8213]  Volz, B. and Y. Pal, "Security of Messages Exchanged
              between Servers and Relay Agents", RFC 8213,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC8213, August 2017,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8213>.

   [RFC8415]  Mrugalski, T., Siodelski, M., Volz, B., Yourtchenko, A.,
              Richardson, M., Jiang, S., Lemon, T., and T. Winters,
              "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)",
              RFC 8415, DOI 10.17487/RFC8415, November 2018,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8415>.

9.2.  Informative References

   [eRouter]  CableLabs, "IPv4 and IPv6 eRouter Specification Version
              I21", February 2022,
              <https://www.cablelabs.com/specifications/CM-SP-eRouter>.

Author's Address

   Timothy Winters
   QA Cafe
   100 Main Street, Suite #212
   Dover, NH 03820
   United States of America
   Email: tim@qacafe.com

Winters                  Expires 23 October 2025                [Page 7]